Showing 3,541 - 3,560 results of 5,962 for search 'conclusion (errors OR error)', query time: 0.15s Refine Results
  1. 3541

    Screening for endometriosis: A scoping review of screening measures that could support early diagnosis by Brittany N. Rosenbloom, Tania Di Renna, Adriano Nella, Mathew Leonardi, Maggie Tiong, Seungmin Lee, Rachael Bosma

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…A majority of the included studies assessed very few measurement properties (e.g., measurement error, structural validity, construct validity or responsiveness, etc…) of the PROM, leaving their quality unknown. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 3542

    The influence of jittering DHS cluster locations on geostatistical model-based estimates of malaria risk in Cameroon by Salomon G. Massoda Tonye, Romain Wounang, Celestin Kouambeng, Penelope Vounatsou

    Published 2024-11-01
    “…The various sets of selected environmental factors were able to capture the main spatial patterns of the disease risk, but the jittering increased the prediction error. The parameter estimates of the effects of socio-economic factors and intervention indicators were relatively stable in the simulated data. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 3543

    Detecting depression in patients with coronary heart disease: a diagnostic evaluation of the PHQ-9 and HADS-D in primary care, findings from the UPBEAT-UK study. by Mark Haddad, Paul Walters, Rachel Phillips, Jacqueline Tsakok, Paul Williams, Anthony Mann, André Tylee

    Published 2013-01-01
    “…Areas under the curves (AUC) (standard error) were 0.95 (0.01) and 0.88 (0.02) for the PHQ-9 and HADS-D, and 0.91 (0.02) for PHQ-9 using the categorical algorithm. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 3544

    Coffee and tea consumption and glioma risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies by Jinyu Pan, Chuan Shao, Hui Tang, Nan Wu

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…The analysis explored glioma risk concerning the highest versus lowest levels of coffee and tea intake, supplemented by a dose–response evaluation using a one-stage robust error meta-regression model.ResultsA total of nine studies, published between 2004 and 2020, were included. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 3545

    An enhanced method of CNNs by incorporating the clustering-guided block for concrete crack recognition by Hui Li, Chenyu Liu, Ning Zhang, Wei Shi

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…Notably, the CG-DeepLabV3 + model significantly reduced the recognition error for locating crack edges to a mere 2.31 pixels. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 3546

    Experimentally profiling dielectric properties of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus by movement velocity and force by Akmal Suhaimi, Arash Zulkarnain, Noraziah Mohamad Zin, Abdullah Abdulhameed, Aminuddin Ahmad Kayani, Ramdzan Buyong

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…The benefits of AI integration into DEP systems include improving position and accuracy, faster processing and decision-making, enhancing particle classification, reducing human error, and many others. On the other hand, DEP research often focuses on CMF values of the particles. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 3547

    Development of a deep learning method to identify acute ischaemic stroke lesions on brain CT by Emanuele Trucco, Joanna M Wardlaw, Wenwen Li, Grant Mair, Amos Storkey, Alessandro Fontanella, Antreas Antoniou, Eleanor Platt, Paul Armitage

    “…Chronic brain conditions reduced accuracy, particularly non-stroke lesions and old stroke lesions (32% and 31% error rates, respectively).Conclusion DL methods can be designed for ischaemic lesion detection on CT using the vast quantities of routinely collected brain scans without the need for lesion annotation. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 3548

    THE EFFECT OF DELAY IN TEMPERATURE VARIATIONS ON RESULTS OF GLUCOSE TEST IN DM PATIENTS WITH HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA by Chori Khotul Ula, Edy Haryanto Edy Haryanto, Syamsul Arifin Syamsul Arifin, Wisnu Istanto

    Published 2023-07-01
    “…Background: The pre-analytic stage has the most significant contribution to error, which is 60% to 70%. This is an excellent contribution to the dependability of laboratory results. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 3549

    Assessment of GEP and ANN for Predicting Suspended Sediment Load: A Case Study of Ghatoor and Aland Rivers, West Azerbaijan, Iran by Emad Fardoost, Majid Dastgahi, Reyhane Nourali, Elham Ayati

    Published 2024-01-01
    “…Two statistical indices were used to evaluate the models: the coefficient of determination (R-squared) and the Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Based on these indices, the intelligent models performed better than the SRC in estimating the suspended sediment volume. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 3550

    Predicting carbohydrate quality in a global database of packaged foods by Eric Antoine Scuccimarra, Alexandre Arnaud, Marie Tassy, Marie Tassy, Kim-Anne Lê, Fabio Mainardi

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…The overall mean absolute error on the test set was 0.96 g/100 g of product. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 3551

    Predicting kidney graft function and failure among kidney transplant recipients by Yi Yao, Brad C. Astor, Wei Yang, Tom Greene, Liang Li

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…Results For prediction up to the next 1 to 5 years, the model achieved high accuracy in predicting graft failure, with the AUC between 0.80 and 0.95, and moderately high accuracy in predicting eGFR, with the root mean squared error between 10 and 18 mL/min/1.73m2 and 70%-90% of predicted eGFR falling within 30% of the observed eGFR. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  12. 3552

    A reliable tool for assessment of acceptance of e-consultation service in hospitals: the modified e-consultation Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire by Rasha Ashmawy, Sally Zeina, Ehab Kamal, Khaled Shelbaya, Nermeen Gawish, Sandy Sharaf, Elrashdy M. Redwan, Azza Mehanna

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the two-factor model, with standardized factor loadings between 0.80 and 0.95, a Comparative Fit Index (CFI) of 0.95, and a Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) of 0.084. Conclusion The modified e-consultation TAM questionnaire proves to be a reliable and valid tool for evaluating physicians’ acceptance of and satisfaction with e-consultation service. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 3553

    Psychometric evaluation and derivation of the Kannada version of the modified (29-item model) Indian Vision Function Assessment Questionnaire by Soujanya Kaup, Jyoshma Dsouza, Siddharudha Shivalli, Sheetal Savur, Vidya Hegde

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…The model-fit to the data assessed by various indices [Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation = 0.08 (90% CI: 0.081–0.091); Comparative Fit Index = 0.877; Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.866; Akaike’s Information Criterion = 23447.133; Bayesian Information Criterion = 23800.45, and Coefficient of Determination = 0.998] demonstrated acceptable fit. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 3554

    The combined impact of AI and VR on interdisciplinary learning and patient safety in healthcare education: a narrative review by Emmanuel Aoudi Chance

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…Strategic implementation can contribute to error reduction, improved patient outcomes, and a culture of safety. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  15. 3555

    Reliability of the Tuck Jump Assessment Using Standardized Rater Training by Kevin Racine, Meghan Warren, Craig Smith, Monica R. Lininger

    Published 2021-02-01
    “…The total score had moderate interrater reliability in both sessions (Session 1: ICC~2,2~ = 0.64; 95% CI (Confidence Interval) (0.34-0.81); Standard Error Measurement (SEM) = 0.66 technique flaws and Session 2: ICC~2,2~ = 0.56; 95% CI (0.04-0.79); SEM = 1.30). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  16. 3556

    Cross-cultural adaption and validation of the Chinese version of the Child Food Neophobia Scale by Yan Liu, JiaoJiao Zou, Qiping Yang, Hanmei Liu, Jing Luo, Yufeng Ouyang, Joyce Wang, Qian Lin

    Published 2019-08-01
    “…A normal χ2/df, CMIN/DF=3.302, Comparative Fit Index, CFI=0.993, Tucker-Lewis Index, TLI=0.986 and root mean square error of approximation, RMSEA=0.077 were found. The CFA results showed that the model indicators were acceptable. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 3557

    Inertial measurement unit technology for gait detection: a comprehensive evaluation of gait traits in two Italian horse breeds by Vittoria Asti, Michela Ablondi, Arnaud Molle, Andrea Zanotti, Matteo Vasini, Alberto Sabbioni

    Published 2024-10-01
    “…Overall, the GBM model exhibits the highest accuracy and the lowest error. In conclusion, integrating IMU technology into horse performance evaluation offers valuable insights, with implications for breeding and training.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 3558

    The relationship between attentional control and injury-related biomechanics in young female volleyball players by Ivana Hanzlíková, Karolína Válová, Michal Lehnert, Martin Dvořáček, Elisa Doleželová, Adam Grinberg

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…Biomechanical measures included the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), single-leg dynamic balance (center of pressure [CoP] movement), leg stiffness during submaximal hopping, and reactive strength index (RSI) during drop jumps. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 3559

    Causality Between 91 Circulating Inflammatory Proteins and Various Asthma Phenotypes: A Mendelian Randomization Study by Zhang S, Zhang X, Wei C, Zhang L, Li Z

    Published 2024-11-01
    “…The FDR correction was performed due to the possibility of a type 1 error.Results: Genetically predicted IVW results revealed a total of 30 data sets suggesting a potential causal relationship between circulating inflammatory proteins and asthma phenotypes. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  20. 3560

    Calculation of IOL Optical Power Using OKULIX Ray-Tracing Software in Real Clinical Practice by K. B. Pershin, N. F. Pashinova, A. Yu. Tsygankov, I. V. Kosova

    Published 2023-04-01
    “…When comparing the devices under study, significant differences were found for the rate of refractive power within ±0.5 D when using the IOLMaster on the one hand and OKULIX on the other (p < 0.05). The refractive error rate of ±1.0 D using the biometric devices did not differ significantly (p > 0.05).Conclusion. …”
    Get full text
    Article