Showing 261 - 280 results of 432 for search 'T42 (classification)', query time: 0.09s Refine Results
  1. 261
  2. 262
  3. 263
  4. 264

    Associations of the Need for Surgery in Emergency Department Patients with Small Bowel Obstructions by Daniel J. Berman, Alexander W. Mahler, Ryan C. Burke, Andrew E. Bennett, Nathan I. Shapiro, Leslie A. Bilello

    Published 2024-11-01
    “…We included adult patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Rev, codes for small bowel obstruction from June 1, 2017– May 30, 2019. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 265

    Demographics and Clinical and Endoscopic Characteristics of Patients with Helicobacter pylori Infection and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Case-Control Study by Amir Mari, Naim Mahroum, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Mahran Shalaata, Tawfik Khoury, Abdulla Watad, Mahmud Mahamid

    Published 2019-01-01
    “…Results. 2,508 GERD patients were included with a median age of 49.42±17.96 years. H. pylori infection was detected in 299 (11.9%) patients. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 266

    Influence of Land-Use and Landcover on the Nest Distribution and Breeding Success of Grey Crowned Crane (Balearica Regulorum) In Kiyanja- Kaku Wetland Ecosystem. by Tayebwa, Gilbert

    Published 2024
    “…The most common clutch size (47.4%) was two eggs, with an average of 2.42 eggs per clutch. It was discovered that land use/cover activities significantly impacted breeding success. …”
    Get full text
    Thesis
  7. 267

    Regulatory problems and developmental psychopathology within the first 2 years of living—a nested in cohort population-based study by Janni Ammitzbøll, Janni Ammitzbøll, Anne Lise Olsen, Susanne Landorph, Christian Ritz, Anne Mette Skovgaard, Anne Mette Skovgaard

    Published 2024-02-01
    “…Follow-up at 1½ years included diagnostic assessment according to the International Classification of Diseases, ICD-10, and the Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders in Infancy and Early Childhood: Revised edition, DC:0-3R. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 268
  9. 269
  10. 270
  11. 271
  12. 272
  13. 273
  14. 274
  15. 275

    Genetic diversity of the Algerian peanut population analyzed using morphological markers and seed storage proteins by H. Djeghim, I. Bellil, D. Khelifi

    Published 2021-10-01
    “…Principal Component Analysis and the Hierarchical Ascendant Classification were made to clarify the genetic relationship between peanut accessions.Results and discussion. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  16. 276

    Clinico-demographical Profile of Pelvis and Acetabular Fracture Presenting in Tertiary Care Center of Nepal: An Observational Study by Ranjib Jha, Santosh Thapa, Asish Rajthala

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…Pelvic fracture was 29 (4.39%) and acetabular fracture was 16 (2.42%). The median age was 38 years (IQR: 25.25-46.75) and 36 (75%) were male. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 277
  18. 278

    Survey of Vegetation cover Changes in Forcados Area of the Niger Delta by Akuro Adoki

    Published 2013-07-01
    “…Stressed Vegetation occupied 2.42km2 in 1988, and increased to 2.6 km2 in 1998 and then increased to 3.33 km2 in 2008. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 279

    Rapid Point-of-Care Influenza Testing for Patients in German Emergency Rooms – A Cost-Benefit Analysis by Roland Diel, Albert Nienhaus

    Published 2019-12-01
    “…If oseltamivir was not offered, testing with the Sofia® reduced costs by €42.28 in favor of the hospital. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, under all reasonable assumptions, implementing the Sofia® saved on average €119.89 as compared to applying the clinical-judgement-only strategy. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  20. 280

    An improved soft voting-based machine learning technique to detect breast cancer utilizing effective feature selection and SMOTE-ENN class balancing by Indu Chhillar, Ajmer Singh

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…The results of the experiment revealed that the soft voting classifier achieved high scores with an accuracy of 99.42%, precision of 100.0%, recall of 98.41%, F1 score of 99.20%, and AUC of 1.0 when it is trained on optimal features obtained from the CBFS method. …”
    Get full text
    Article