-
61
Klasifikasi Ekspresi Wajah Menggunakan Covolutional Neural Network
Published 2024-12-01Get full text
Article -
62
Decision-Making Factors Among Dentists for Using Dental Magnifying Loupes: A Cross-Sectional Study
Published 2025-02-01“…Using DMLs for “better vision” was the most selected (63.64%) option by DMLs users, followed by “increased clinical efficacy” (61.36%), “improved patient care” (50%), and “better ergonomics” (47.73%). …”
Get full text
Article -
63
Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for spinal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 2025-02-01“…We assessed study quality using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled results. Results Overall, 36 studies involving 925 patients were included. …”
Get full text
Article -
64
-
65
Verbal paired associates learning lateralizes left hippocampal sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy
Published 2025-02-01Get full text
Article -
66
Prediksi Detak Jantung Berbasis LSTM pada Raspberry Pi untuk Pemantauan Kesehatan Portabel
Published 2024-10-01Get full text
Article -
67
Features of development and progression of colorectal cancer on a background of ulcerative colitis
Published 2012-02-01“…In 7 (10,8%) cases of 65 the signs of dysplasia of intestinal epithelium were not revealed, in 24 (36,9%) dysplasia of moderate degree and in 34 (52,3%) – high degree was observed. …”
Get full text
Article -
68
Self-Perceived Barriers to Pediatric Cancer Care in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Cross-Sectional Multinational Study
Published 2025-02-01“…Inclusion criteria comprised a cancer diagnosis according to the International Classification of Childhood Cancer, age 0-19 years, and year of diagnosis 2017-2019. …”
Get full text
Article -
69
Describing quality of life trajectories in young Hispanic women with breast cancer: 5-year results from a large prospective cohort
Published 2025-02-01“…Results: A total of 477 women (median age: 36; IQR: 32–38) were clustered into the best (n = 259, 54 %), good (n = 79, 17 %), or poor trajectory groups (n = 139, 29 %). …”
Get full text
Article -
70
-
71
-
72