Showing 61 - 80 results of 93 for search 'Social Science Research Council', query time: 0.10s Refine Results
  1. 61
  2. 62
  3. 63
  4. 64
  5. 65

    Cultural Heritage in the Field of the Idea of Nature Protection in the Second Polish Republic (1918-1939) as an Antecedent of Ecological Education in Poland at the Turn of the 21st... by Edyta Wolter

    Published 2023-09-01
    “…They were advocates of nature reserves, national parks, as well as broadly understood education of Polish society aimed at raising ecological awareness (environmental education). The research problem is set in the interpretative paradigm of humanistic, social sciences. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 66
  7. 67
  8. 68
  9. 69
  10. 70

    Protocol for process evaluation of SMART Mental Health cluster randomised control trial: an intervention for management of common mental disorders in India by Anushka Patel, David Peiris, Pallab K Maulik, Graham Thornicroft, Shekhar Saxena, Sudha Kallakuri, Amanpreet Kaur, Siddhardha Devarapalli, Mercian Daniel, Beverley M Essue, Shashi Kant, D Praveen, Usha Raman, Rajesh Sagar, Ankita Mukherjee

    Published 2022-06-01
    “…The design and analysis will be guided by Medical Research Council framework for process evaluations, the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, and the normalisation process theory.Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the ethics committee of the George Institute for Global Health, India and the Institutional Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 71
  12. 72
  13. 73
  14. 74
  15. 75
  16. 76
  17. 77

    The quality of judicial decisions in cases of bullying in professional educational institutions by O. G. Yushkevych

    Published 2023-12-01
    “…Criteria for a high-quality judicial decision include justice, timeliness, justification, clarity, clear language, and an accessible style. The researchers also distinguish between objective (legal training, legal experience, qualification requirements for judicial candidates, opportunities for practicing judges to improve their skills, mechanisms for monitoring the work of judges, unrestricted public access to judicial decisions, the role of legal science in analysing judicial decisions) and subjective (the judge’s personality, salary, social guarantees, working conditions and ability to organise their work) factors that affect the quality of a judicial decision. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 78
  19. 79
  20. 80