Search alternatives:
fast » east (Expand Search)
Showing 81 - 100 results of 205 for search '((fast OR fact) OR face) research random three algorithm', query time: 0.12s Refine Results
  1. 81
  2. 82
  3. 83
  4. 84
  5. 85
  6. 86

    The protocol for a multicentre prospective randomized noninferiority trial of surgical reduction versus non-surgical casting for displaced distal radius fractures in children: Chil... by Daniel C. Perry, Juul Achten, James Mason, Daphne Kounail, Nicolas Nicolaou, David Metcalfe, Mark Lyttle, Elizabeth Tutton, Duncan Appelbe, Phoebe Gibson, Matthew L. Costa

    Published 2025-05-01
    “…The primary outcome is the PROMIS Upper Extremity Score at three months post-randomization. All data will be obtained through electronic questionnaires completed by the participants and/or parents/guardians. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 87
  8. 88
  9. 89
  10. 90
  11. 91
  12. 92
  13. 93
  14. 94
  15. 95
  16. 96
  17. 97
  18. 98

    Forest canopy closure estimation in mountainous southwest China using multi-source remote sensing data by Wenwu Zhou, Wenwu Zhou, Qingtai Shu, Cuifen Xia, Li Xu, Qin Xiang, Lianjin Fu, Zhengdao Yang, Shuwei Wang

    Published 2025-08-01
    “…Then, the multi-source remote sensing image Sentinel-1/2 and terrain factors were combined to perform regional-scale FCC remote sensing estimation based on the geographically weighted regression (GWR) model. The research results showed that (1) among the 50 extracted ATLAS LiDAR feature indices, the best footprint-scale modeling factors are Landsat_perc, h_dif_canopy, asr, h_min_canopy, toc_roughness, and n_touc_photons after random forest (RF) feature variable optimization; (2) among the BO-RFR, BO-KNN, and BO-GBRT models developed at the footprint scale, the FCC results estimated by the BO-GBRT model were the best (R2 = 0.65, RMSE = 0.10, RS = 0.079, and P = 79.2%), which was used as the FCC estimation model for 74,808 footprints in the study area; (3) taking the FCC value of ATLAS footprint scale in forest land as the training sample data of the regional-scale GWR model, the model accuracy was R2 = 0.70, RMSE = 0.06, and P = 88.27%; and (4) the R² between the FCC estimates from regional-scale remote sensing and the measured values is 0.70, with a correlation coefficient of 0.784, indicating strong agreement. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 99
  20. 100