Search alternatives:
selection » detection (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 814 for search '(( effective microarray ) OR ( selection microarray ))', query time: 0.14s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Consistency and Stability in Feature Selection for High-Dimensional Microarray Survival Data in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Cancer by Kazeem A. Dauda, Rasheed K. Lamidi

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…High-dimensional survival data, such as microarray datasets, present significant challenges in variable selection and model performance due to their complexity and dimensionality. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 2

    Optimization based tumor classification from microarray gene expression data. by Onur Dagliyan, Fadime Uney-Yuksektepe, I Halil Kavakli, Metin Turkay

    Published 2011-02-01
    “…<h4>Background</h4>An important use of data obtained from microarray measurements is the classification of tumor types with respect to genes that are either up or down regulated in specific cancer types. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 3

    Phenotypic Profiling of Selected Cellulolytic Strains to Develop a Crop Residue-Decomposing Bacterial Consortium by Arman Shamshitov, Egidija Satkevičiūtė, Francesca Decorosi, Carlo Viti, Skaidrė Supronienė

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…Therefore, this study aimed to address these limitations by assessing the metabolic profiles of five previously identified cellulolytic bacterial strains, including <i>Bacillus pumilus</i> 1G17, <i>Micromonospora chalcea</i> 1G49, <i>Bacillus mobilis</i> 5G17, <i>Streptomyces canus</i> 1TG5, and <i>Streptomyces achromogenes</i> 3TG21 using Biolog Phenotype Microarray analysis. Moreover, this study evaluated the impact of wheat straw inoculation with single strains and a bacterial consortium on soil organic carbon and nitrogen content in a pot experiment. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 4

    Effective detection of 148 cases chromosomal mosaicism by karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis and QF-PCR in 32,967 prenatal diagnoses by Yi Deng, Lan Zeng, Zhiling Wu, Jin Wang, Mengling Ye, Chun Chen, Ping Wei, Danni Wang, Guangming Deng, Shuyao Zhu

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…Methods A total of 148 fetuses diagnosed with chromosomal mosaicism by karyotyping with copy number variant sequencing (CNV-seq)/ chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) were selected, and the results from three the methods were compared and further analyzed. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 5

    CRISPR screens and lectin microarrays identify high mannose N-glycan regulators by C. Kimberly Tsui, Nicholas Twells, Jenni Durieux, Emma Doan, Jacqueline Woo, Noosha Khosrojerdi, Janiya Brooks, Ayodeji Kulepa, Brant Webster, Lara K. Mahal, Andrew Dillin

    Published 2024-11-01
    “…We used CRISPR screens to uncover the expanded network of genes controlling high mannose levels, followed by lectin microarrays to fully measure the complex effect of select regulators on glycosylation globally. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 6

    Machine learning identification of molecular targets for medulloblastoma subgroups using microarray gene fingerprint analysis by Alicia Reveles-Espinoza, Ulises Villela, Edgar Hernandez-Martinez, Isaac Chairez, Sergio Juárez-Méndez, J. Casanova-Moreno, Ma. del Pilar Eguía-Aguilar, Luis Figueroa-Yáñez, Adriana Vallejo-Cardona, Iván Salgado

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…The classification achieved an average accuracy of 96%, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Feature selection using the Kruskal–Wallis and χ2 tests revealed statistically relevant genes contributing to subgroup discrimination. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 7

    Microarray analysis of virulence gene profiles in Salmonella serovars from food/food animal environment by Wen Zou, Sufian F Al-Khaldi, William S Branham, Tao Han, James C Fuscoe, Jing Han, Steven L Foley, Joshua Xu, Hong Fang, Carl E Cerniglia, Rajesh Nayak

    Published 2010-09-01
    “…Conclusions: This hybridization array presents an accurate and cost-effective method for evaluating the disease-causing potential of Salmonella in outbreak investigations by targeting a selective set of Salmonella-associated virulence genes.  …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

    FEATURE SELECTION IN THE TASK OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS ON MICROARRAY DATA by N. G. Zagoruiko, O. A. Kutnenko, I. A. Borisova, V. V. Dyubanov, D. A. Levanov, O. A. Zyranov

    Published 2015-01-01
    “…The high efficiency of the algorithm is illustrated by results of solving the task of disease recognition on a microarray dataset.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  12. 12
  13. 13

    Silver coated porous silicon microarray SERS platform for detecting aflatoxin B1 fumonisin B1 and ochratoxin A by Rohit Kumar Singh, Narsingh R. Nirala, Sudharsan Sadhasivam, Divagar Muthukumar, Edward Sionov, Giorgi Shtenberg

    Published 2025-08-01
    “…Herein, we present a newly developed nanostructured microarray based on silver-coated porous silicon (Ag-pSi) used as a surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) transducer. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

    Identification and validation of a novel autoantibody biomarker panel for differential diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by Metoboroghene O. Mowoe, Metoboroghene O. Mowoe, Hisham Allam, Joshua Nqada, Marc Bernon, Karan Gandhi, Sean Burmeister, Urda Kotze, Miriam Kahn, Christo Kloppers, Suba Dharshanan, Zafirah Azween, Pamela Maimela, Paul Townsend, Eduard Jonas, Jonathan M. Blackburn, Jonathan M. Blackburn

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…Specifically, we quantified the serological AAb profiles of 94 PDAC, chronic pancreatitis (CP), other pancreatic- (PC) and prostate cancers (PRC), non-ulcer dyspepsia patients (DYS), and healthy controls (HC).ResultsCombinatorial ROC curve analysis on the training cohort data from the cancer antigen microarrays identified the most effective biomarker combination as CEACAM1-DPPA2-DPPA3-MAGEA4-SRC-TPBG-XAGE3 with an AUC = 85·0% (SE = 0·828, SP = 0·684). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  20. 20