THE STRAWSONIAN AND LEDGER CONCEPTION OF MORAL RESPONSIBILITY by STEFAAN E. CUYPERS

Get full text

Physicalism and moral responsibility: presentation of derivative consequence argument by B. V. Faul

Subjects: Get full text

The impact of action descriptions on attribution of moral responsibility towards robots by Ziggy O’Reilly, Serena Marchesi, Agnieszka Wykowska

Subjects: Get full text

Gerhard Bos and Marcus Düwell (eds.): Human Rights and Sustainability: Moral Responsibilities for the Future by Julia Flegel, Maria Lenk

Get full text

M. Walker. Branching Is Not a Bug; It’s a Feature: Personal Identity and Legal (and Moral) Responsibility / trans. from Engl. V. A. Pilipenko by V. A. Pilipenko

Get full text

Strawson, Responsibility, and Fittingness by E. V. Loginov

Subjects: Get full text

Pride and Prejudice against Personal Identity by R. L. Kochnev

Subjects: Get full text

New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections by B. V. Faul

Subjects: Get full text

The Thirsty Traveler and Luck-Free Moral Luck by Samuel Kahn

Subjects: Get full text

English derby in philosophy: John Locke versus Derek Parfit by A. V. Nekhaev

Subjects: Get full text

In defence of the standard psychological theory: can a person be a type? by A. V. Mertsalov

Subjects: Get full text

Punishing (Not)Innocent Persons? by A. V. Nekhaev

Subjects: Get full text

Being and becoming "fully human" in an HIV-positive world: HIV/AIDS and feminist Christian spirituality by D. Snyman, L. Kretzschmar

“… Feminists have researched the link between gender and HIV/AIDS and shown that women are not always morally responsible for being HIV-positive. This article contributes to the debate by presenting a systematic discussion of women’s experience of HIV/AIDS and spirituality. …”
Get full text

Formation of the "Self-Made-Man" Idea in the Context of the Christian Middle Ages by V. Y. Antonova, O. M. Korkh

“…In particular, the idea that a person who does not act freely cannot be morally responsible for what he does, as well as the intentions of the ancient sage to autonomy, autarky, and apoliticism. …”
Get full text

KATALIKYBĖ IR VISUOMENĖ TARPUKARIO LIETUVOJE by Valdas Pruskus

“…Protesting against too active wardship of an individual and a distrust in his (her) ability to make an independent choice and conscious self-determination, which dominated in the practice of the Churc of that times, the modernists defended the necessity to revitalize the authentic faith, deeply hidden in a human, to strengthen his (her) religious aspirations and in such way to cherish a spirituality, because no conscious and morally responsible activities are not able without it. …”
Get full text

Contextual Vulnerability Should Guide Fair Subject Selection in Xenotransplantation Clinical Trials by Gianna Strand

“…Then, the transplantation team exploited this disadvantage they were morally responsible for creating. The subject agreed to the terms for an experimental and high-risk xenograft from a place of vulnerability due to the diminished range of choice specifically constructed by the policy and actions of the transplant center. …”
Get full text

Stoicism and Frankfurtian Compatibilism by László Bernáth

“…Both of them provide a semi-compatibilist reason- and reflectivity-based theory of moral responsibility. Finally, in the third section, I describe the difference that I take to be the most relevant between these theories regarding the problem of moral responsibility. …”
Get full text

Punish no clone by R. L. Kochnev

“…This article is a commentary and supplementary study to the Russian translation of Mark Walker’s article «Branching Is Not a Bug; It’s a Feature: Personal Identity and Legal (and Moral) Responsibility» published in this journal. The article discusses the difficulties that type/token theory encounters when analyzing cases of the existence of art objects and persons over time. …”
Get full text

To what theories of laws of nature B. Faul’s argument is applicable? by T. S. Demin

“…The derivative argument of the consequences is aimed at proving the incompatibility of certain theories of the laws of nature in conjunction with physicalism and the existence of moral responsibility. In this text, it is outlined the applicability of this argument to the most famous theories of the laws of nature. …”
Get full text