Showing 21 - 40 results of 78 for search '"JAMA"', query time: 0.04s Refine Results
  1. 21
  2. 22
  3. 23
  4. 24
  5. 25
  6. 26
  7. 27
  8. 28

    YouTube as an information source in deep margin elevation: Reliability, accuracy and quality analysis. by Zeyneb Merve Ozdemir, Sevim Atılan Yavuz, Derya Gursel Surmelioglu

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…Statistically significant differences were observed only for the JAMA scores when comparing the video source groups (p = 0.001). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 29

    Quality of information in gestational diabetes mellitus videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional study. by Genyan Jiang, Lei Chen, Lan Geng, Yuhan Zhang, Zhiqi Chen, Yaqi Zhu, Shuangshuang Ma, Mei Zhao

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…The quality of the videos was assessed using three standardized evaluation tools: DISCERN, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmarks, and the Global Quality Scale (GQS). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 30

    YouTube Hindi Videos Proved to be a Valid and Reliable Source of Health Information: A Case Study of COVID-19 Vaccine by Nibha Sinha, Sonali Patle

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…The DISCERN median was found to be 9.00 (5–10), the JAMA median score was 6.00 (3–8), and the DISCERN score was 40.50 (16–49). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 31
  12. 32

    L'Inde de 1919 à 1941 : nationalismes, « communalisme », prosélytisme et fondamentalisme by Marc Gaborieau

    Published 2002-04-01
    “…These writings carried the seed for the Jamâ'at-i Islâmî, a militant organisation which was formally organised in 1941. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 33

    Online patients questions regarding reverse total shoulder arthroplasty pertain to timeline of recovery, specific activities, and limitations by Kyle K. Obana, MD, Dane R.G. Lind, BA, Andrew J. Luzzi, MD, Michaela J. O’Connor, MD, Matthew R. LeVasseur, MD, William N. Levine, MD

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…PubMed articles consisted of 41.2% of Government websites. The average JAMA score for all websites was 1.48 ± 1.27. Government websites had the highest JAMA score (3.11 ± 1.01) and constituted 55.9% of all websites with a score of 4/4. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 34
  15. 35

    COVID-19 prevention and treatment information on the internet: a systematic analysis and quality assessment by Daniel Richardson, Ka Siu Fan, Shahi Abdul Ghani, Nikolaos Machairas, Lorenzo Lenti, Ka Hay Fan, Aneya Scott, Dimitri Aristotle Raptis

    Published 2020-09-01
    “…Websites discussing both prevention and treatment (n=73, 23%) score significantly higher across all tools (p<0.001).Conclusion This comprehensive assessment of online COVID-19 information using EQIP, JAMA and DISCERN Tools indicate that most websites were inadequate. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  16. 36

    How Qualified is Online Information Regarding Space Maintainers? A Content-quality and Readability Analysis by Semih Ercan Akgün

    Published 2024-08-01
    “…Only 3 (3.3%) provided all JAMA criteria and PHO websites scored significantly higher than the others in almost all categories (p<0.05).Conclusions: Within the limitation of this study, web-based information regarding pediatric space maintainers was inadequate and scientifically imperfect. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 37
  18. 38

    Evaluating the readability, quality, and reliability of online information on sjogren's syndrome by Erkan Ozduran, Volkan Hanci

    Published 2023-01-01
    “…The Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) score was used to assess the websites' reliability, the DISCERN score, the Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct (HONcode) was used to assess quality, and Alexa was used to analyze their popularity. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 39
  20. 40

    Health information analysis of cryptorchidism-related short videos: Analyzing quality and reliability by Yuqiang Sun, Xingjian Liu, Xintao Zhang, Qiongqian Xu, Aiwu Li

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…Medical professionals’ videos had higher JAMA scores than those by nonmedical professionals ( P  < .001), but no significant differences were found in GQS ( P  = .633) or modified DISCERN scores ( P  = .853). …”
    Get full text
    Article