Showing 521 - 540 results of 624 for search '"Heilongjiang"', query time: 0.05s Refine Results
  1. 521
  2. 522
  3. 523
  4. 524
  5. 525

    Variations of the Reference Evapotranspiration and Aridity Index Over Northeast China: Changing Properties and Possible Causes by Liguo Cao, Zhengchao Zhou

    Published 2019-01-01
    “…Spatially, the high values of AI and ET0 were primarily at the western part of the study area except for the Heilongjiang province, and the stations showing low values were mainly distributed in the central and eastern part. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 526
  7. 527

    Data mobilisation for historical records of vascular plants in eastern Asia: V. L. Komarov’s expedition to Far-Eastern Russia, China and Korea from 1895 to 1897 by Chin Sung Chang, Kae Sun Chang, Hui Kim

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…Komarov in Far-Eastern Russia, Heilongjiang, Jilin, the eastern region of Liaoning in China and the northern region of Korea. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 528

    The Semenov-Znamensky family in Harbin. Materials for the biography by A. N. Steblyanskaya

    Published 2024-05-01
    “…Nowadays this city is the administrative center of the Chinese province of Heilongjiang. We should not forget about the people who built the Chinese Eastern Railway, as well as about the Russian emigrants who lived in Harbin, but kept the image of Russia in their hearts and contributed enough to Russian culture and science. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 529
  10. 530
  11. 531
  12. 532
  13. 533
  14. 534
  15. 535
  16. 536
  17. 537
  18. 538

    Identifying groundwater potential zones in a typical irrigation district using the geospatial technique and analytic hierarchy process by QianYu Song, Meng Ma, YuYu Liu, ZhongPeng Wang, WenYong Wu, ZhengHe Xu, Jianwen Xue

    Published 2025-12-01
    “…This study delineates Groundwater Potential Zones (GWPZs) in the Heping Irrigation District of Heilongjiang Province using GIS and AHP. The 12 key factors influencing groundwater potential (GWP) were analyzed, and a comprehensive evaluation map was created, categorizing the area into five suitability grades: 0.03% is classified as very good, 10.79% as good, 57.41% as moderate, 30.93% as poor, and 0.84% as very poor. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 539
  20. 540