Showing 61 - 78 results of 78 for search '"Cochrane Collaboration"', query time: 0.04s Refine Results
  1. 61

    Clinical Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis by GU Jinyu, LI Kaiming, ZHANG Qing, LI Linghui, BAI Zixing, WANG Shangquan

    Published 2022-08-01
    “…Literature screening and data extraction were carried out independently by two researchers, and the literature quality was evaluated according to the Cochrane Collaboration Network standard. RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 62

    Does completion of radical hysterectomy improve oncological outcomes of women with clinical early-stage cervical cancer and intraoperative detection of nodal involvement?: protocol... by Hui Xu, Qing Liu, Yu Xu, Yi Du, Ai Zheng, Cui Hu, Ya Jia, Qianwen Zhang, Yue-Dong He, Shuang-Shuang Cui, Yong Tian, Lin Ran, Fengmei Ke

    Published 2022-07-01
    “…The risk of bias for the included studies will be evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or the Cochrane collaboration’s tool. The grade of evidence will be evaluated by two independent members of our team using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required because there will no primary data collected. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 63

    Impact of mother’s own milk expression practices and processing treatments on infant health and growth outcomes: a systematic review protocol by Daniel Klotz, Carolyn Smith, Agnieszka Bzikowska-Jura, Marzia Giribaldi, Tanya Cassidy, Laura Cavallarin, Serena Gandino, Karolina Karcz, Chiara Peila, Bartłomiej Walczak, Aleksandra Wesolowska

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…The present protocol was designed to gather the evidence on the effect that the expression method, the hygiene regimen and setting and any processing used on expressed MOM can have on the clinical outcomes of recipient infants.Methods This systematic review will follow the methodological recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration, in accordance with WHO recommendations and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 64

    Meta Analysis on Rehabilitation Effect of Proprioception Training on Ankle Sprainof Athletes by Yuxiao CHEN, Jiaojiao LIU, Changsong Yi, Mengguang CHAI, Qing WANG, Lei JIANG

    Published 2020-12-01
    “…Objective:To explore the effects of proprioception training on the incidence of athletes' ankle sprains, dynamic neuromuscular control, postural stability and joint position perception.Methods:Data were searched from the databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), Wanfang Database(Wangfang Data), Chinese Journal Full-text Database(VIP), China Biomedical Literature Database(CBMdisc).Athletes were included in the randomized controlled trials(RCTs)who were treated with proprioception training to improve the function of athlete's ankle joint.The retrieval time for each database was from the establishment of the database to December 31, 2019, and the references of related documents were traced.Two researchers independently searchered the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of the literature.RevMan5.3 software was used to analyze the data.According to the systematic review manual provided by the Cochrane Collaboration Network, the continuous variables use mean difference(<italic>MD</italic>)and 95%confidence interval(<italic>CI</italic>)as indicators, and binary variables use risk ratio(RR)and 95%<italic>CI</italic> as indicators.The statistical heterogeneity was judged comprehensively by chi-square test(χ<sup>2</sup>test)and the Heterogeneity test(<italic>I</italic><sup>2</sup>test).If <italic>P</italic>≥0.1 and <italic>I</italic><sup>2</sup>≤50%, a fixed effects model would be used.In contrast, if <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.1 or <italic>I</italic><sup>2</sup>&gt;50%, a random effects model would be used.Results:A total of 11 RCTs and 1 776 athletes were included.The results of Meta analysis showed that compared with the control group, the incidence of ankle sprains in the experimental group was significantly reduced after proprioceptive training[<italic>RR</italic>=0.61, 95%<italic>CI</italic>(0.41, 0.90), <italic>P</italic>=0.01]; compared with the control group, the posterolateral and posterior medical maximum extension distances of the experimental group increased significantly after proprioception training[<italic>MD</italic>=4.44, 95%<italic>CI</italic>(3.66, 5.23), <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.00 001;<italic>MD</italic>=4.21, 95%<italic>CI</italic>(3.18, 5.24), <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.00 001]and the difference was statistically significant;but there was no significant difference in the improvement effect of the anterior maximum extension distance, and the difference was not statistically significant(<italic>P</italic>&gt;0.05).The postural sway of the affected ankle joint in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group;the athletes in the experimental group had better position perception ability in the ankle joint plantar flexion, dorsiflexion, middle and lateral directions than the control group.Conclusion:Proprioceptive training can effectively reduce the incidence of athletes' ankle sprains, improve dynamic neuromuscular control, improve postural stability, and enhance ankle joint position perception, which is worthy of clinical application.However, the absolute effect is not yet clear, so large samples and high-quality randomized controlled trials are still needed to further verify the efficacy of proprioception training, so as to provide more reliable evidence-based evidence for clinical rehabilitation.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 65

    Effect of Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Lower Limb Motor Function of Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Meta-Analysis by JIANG Xiaoyu, BI Hongyan, SUN Wenyu, LIU Huifen, SU Hang, JIANG Jiahui

    Published 2023-04-01
    “…RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis according to the systematic evaluation manual provided by the Cochrane Collaboration Network. The statistical heterogeneity was assessed by probability value (<italic>P</italic> value) and heterogeneity value (<italic>I</italic><sup>2</sup> value). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 66

    Effects of open-skill exercise on executive functions in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Shunding Hu, Peng Shi, Ziyun Zhang, Xiaosu Feng, Kai Zhang, Kai Zhang, Kai Zhang, Teng Jin

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…Two researchers independently screened the articles and extracted data, and used the bias risk assessment tool recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration Network and the Methodological Index for Non- Randomized Studies (MINORS) scale to assess included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental designs (QEDs). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 67

    Meta-Analysis of Daoyin Therapy on Therapeutic Effect and Quality of Life in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris by QIAO Meng, WANG Zhifei, TAN Chaoren, DAI Jingang

    Published 2023-02-01
    “…The retrieval time was from inception to December 2021.The risk of bias assessment tool provided by the Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 5.1 was used to assess the quality of the literature, and the RevMan 5.3 software (provided by the Cochrane Collaboration) was used to perform a meta-analysis. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 68

    Process Evaluations of Interventions for the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review by Iklil Iman Mohd Sa'id, Natasha Hotung, Madeleine Benton, Iliatha Papachristou Nadal, Anisah Baharom, Matthew Prina, Barakatun Nisak Mohd Yusof, Kimberley Goldsmith, Samantha Birts, Ching Siew Mooi, Angus Forbes, Khalida Ismail, Boon How Chew

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…Five electronic bibliographic databases (Cochrane Library, Cochrane Collaboration Registry of Controlled Trials, Embase, PubMed, and MEDLINE) were searched to identify relevant studies. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 69

    The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in ankle disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Qixin Ding, Xu Wang, Yurong Liu, Yuefang Li, Di Zhang, Heling Wang, Shenhong Ma, Qiaohua Han, Weisheng Zhuang

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. The outcome indicators were the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Rating Scale (AOFAS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores used to evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 70

    Systematic Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Shiyiwei Shenqi (Ginseng and Astraglus, Eleven Ingredients) Preparation in Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Malignant Tumor by Bowei HUANG, Yuhui ZENG, Lisha LU, Huijuan GAN

    Published 2021-04-01
    “…According to the systematic evaluation manual provided by Cochrane Collaboration, the continuity variables used mean difference (<italic>MD</italic>) and 95%confidence interval (<italic>CI</italic>) as effect indexes, the dichotomous used odds ratio (<italic>OR</italic>) and 95%<italic>CI</italic> as effect indexes. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 71

    Surgical resection, radiotherapy and percutaneous thermal ablation for treatment of stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis by Arun Chockalingam, Menelaos Konstantinidis, Brandon Koo, John Timothy Moon, Andrew Tran, Sahar Nourouzpour, Emily Lawson, Kathleen Fox, Peiman Habibollahi, Bruno Odisio, Mohammed Loya, Ali Bassir, Nariman Nezami

    Published 2022-06-01
    “…Risk of bias will be assessed using tools developed by the Cochrane collaboration. Two reviewers will independently assess the eligibility of studies and conduct the corresponding risk of bias assessments. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  12. 72

    System Evaluation of Buyang Huanwu Decoction in Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke by TANG Qiang, ZHANG Shiqiang, ZHU Luwen, TANG Yizhou, LI Hongyu

    Published 2021-12-01
    “…According to the system review manual provided by the Cochrane Collaboration Network, mean difference (<italic>MD</italic>) and 95% confidence interval (<italic>CI</italic>) were used as indicators for continuous variables, and risk ratio (<italic>RR</italic>) and 95% <italic>CI</italic> were used as indicators for enumeration data. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 73

    The dose–effect relationship between acupuncture and its effect on primary insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Xiaoni Zhang, Xiaoni Zhang, Yue Wang, Chengyong Liu, Shan Qin, Liyu Lin, Liyu Lin, Can Dong, Wenzhong Wu, Wenzhong Wu, Zhaoming Chen

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan v.5.4 and Stata 16.0 software.ResultsA total of 56 studies were included. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 74

    The effectiveness of digital technology-based Otago Exercise Program on balance ability, muscle strength and fall efficacy in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Zihao He, Hua Wu, Guanggao Zhao, Yiming Zhang, Chao Li, Yachen Xing, Anjie Xu, Junchao Yang, Ronghui Wang

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…Bias risks were assessed using the Cochrane collaboration tool. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the pooled effect of balance ability (static and dynamic), muscle strength, and fall efficacy using a random effects model. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  15. 75

    Meta Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Moxibustion on Neurogenic Bladder after Spinal Cord Injury by Xueqi HAN, Huirong HUANG, Zhongbiao XIU, Jingling WU, Qinyu LIU, Shaofang MIAO, Xiaona YAN

    Published 2020-08-01
    “…According to the systematic review manual provided by the Cochrane Collaboration Network, continuous variables use mean difference (<italic>MD</italic>) and 95%confidence interval (<italic>CI</italic>) as indicators, and binary variables use risk ratio (<italic>RR</italic>) and 95%<italic>CI</italic> as indicators. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  16. 76

    Nasogastric Nutrition versus Nasojejunal Nutrition in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials by Youfeng Zhu, Haiyan Yin, Rui Zhang, Xiaoling Ye, Jianrui Wei

    Published 2016-01-01
    “…We performed the meta-analysis using the Cochrane Collaborations’ RevMan 5.3 software. Results. We included four randomized controlled trials involving 237 patients with SAP. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 77

    Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Electrical Stimulation in Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis by Kaiming LI, Shangquan WANG, Linghui LI, Qing ZHANG, Long LIANG, Ming CHEN, Jiawen ZHAN, Jing YIN, Zhuo WANG

    Published 2021-02-01
    “…Literature data were extracted and reviewed independently by two reviewers, quality evaluation was conducted following the Cochrane collaborative standards, and Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.Results:According to the inclusion criteria, 6 randomized controlled trials with a total of 991 patients were included, including 502 in the experimental group and 489 in the control group, with a ratio of 1∶1. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 78

    Tibial stem extension versus standard configuration in primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis by Arash Heidari, Mohammad H. Ebrahimzadeh, Mahla Daliri, Ali Moradi, Mahdieh Sahebi, Masoumeh Sadeghi

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…The retrieved studies were assessed for methodological quality using Cochrane Collaborations tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials (ROB) and Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies—of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools. …”
    Get full text
    Article