Showing 201,061 - 201,080 results of 212,541 for search '"C "', query time: 0.84s Refine Results
  1. 201061
  2. 201062
  3. 201063

    Protocol paper: randomized controlled trial of the smart online-to-offline model development for chronic diseases management through digital health in real world setting by Jae Eun Shin, Juho Choi, Heejung Lee, Suk-Won Lee, Juhwan Oh

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…To evaluate the primary and secondary outcomes—such as HbA1c, systolic blood pressure, and cholesterol levels—the study applies a range of statistical methods. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 201064
  5. 201065
  6. 201066
  7. 201067
  8. 201068
  9. 201069
  10. 201070
  11. 201071
  12. 201072
  13. 201073
  14. 201074
  15. 201075
  16. 201076

    Ⅱ型套筒灌浆搭接接头单向拉伸力学性能研究 by 尹喜慧, 田川江, 余琼, 郭霖, 谢青海, 许志远

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…结果表明:试件破坏形式、荷载-位移曲线、承载力和延性均与试验结果吻合较好,验证了精细化模型的准确性;后插入钢筋紧贴预留钢筋布置于套筒轴线时试件极限承载力和延性最大,后插入钢筋紧贴套筒偏心布置时试件极限承载力最小;近钢筋侧套筒中部纵向应变值大于远钢筋侧应变值,而环向应变则相反;试件承载力随套筒壁厚的增大而增大,建议套筒长边及短边壁厚分别取为8 mm和4 mm;套筒长边壁厚小于8 mm时,增大套筒壁厚可有效降低套筒环向应变;钢筋发生拉断破坏前,随着搭接长度的增加,试件承载力及延性增大;随着搭接长度的增加,套筒短边纵向应变先增大后减小,长边环向应变逐渐减小;C30混凝土可满足接头的防偏转要求;提出了Ⅱ型APC接头的黏结强度计算公式及临界搭接长度公式,研究成果可为Ⅱ型APC接头的设计提供理论基础。…”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 201077

    Adiponectin and Nitric Oxide Deficiency-Induced Cognitive Impairment in Fatigued Home-Resident in Mature and Older Adults: A Case-Control Study by Ahmad H. Alghadir, Sami A. Gabr, Murad Almomani, Fidaa Almomani, Cynthia Tse

    Published 2022-01-01
    “…The levels of adiponectin, nitric oxide (NO), and variables related to diabetes, such as blood sugar and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c %), were assessed using ELISA and spectrophotometric immunoassays. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 201078

    Emergency Medicine Clerkship Grading Scheme, Grade, and Rank-List Distribution as Reported on Standardized Letters of Evaluation by Alexandra Mannix, Thomas Beardsley, Thomas Alcorn, Morgan Sweere, Michael Gottlieb

    Published 2024-10-01
    “…We determined the mean percent of each grade: Honors/A 27.6%; High Pass/B 31.1%; Pass/C 40.8%; Low Pass/D 0.2%; and Fail/F 0.3%. Finally, we determined the mean percent for each rank-list position: top 10% was 17.6%; top third 36.5%; mid third 34.1%; and low third 11.8%. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 201079
  20. 201080