Medico-legal litigation of UK physiotherapists in relation to cauda equina syndrome: a multimethods study

Objective The aim was to investigate the extent of cauda equina syndrome (CES) litigation and explore the process of medico-legal litigation in relation to physiotherapy in the UK.Design A multimethods inquiry that followed on from a previously conducted scoping literature review was undertaken to a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gillian Yeowell, Susan Greenhalgh, James Selfe, Rachel Leech, Emma Willis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e060023.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832577713916870656
author Gillian Yeowell
Susan Greenhalgh
James Selfe
Rachel Leech
Emma Willis
author_facet Gillian Yeowell
Susan Greenhalgh
James Selfe
Rachel Leech
Emma Willis
author_sort Gillian Yeowell
collection DOAJ
description Objective The aim was to investigate the extent of cauda equina syndrome (CES) litigation and explore the process of medico-legal litigation in relation to physiotherapy in the UK.Design A multimethods inquiry that followed on from a previously conducted scoping literature review was undertaken to address the aim. This included freedom of information requests and direct communication with relevant stakeholders and organisations.Results A total of 2496 CES claims were found in the UK between 2012 and 2020. 51 of these were attributed to physiotherapists. There was little information available to physiotherapists regarding the legal process of litigation and much of this information was not from a physiotherapist’s perspective.Conclusion This is the first study that has investigated the extent and process of CES litigation in physiotherapy in the UK. The extent of CES litigation appears to be high considering CES is a rare spinal condition. Furthermore, the extent of CES litigation is suspected to be considerably higher than the data reported in this study due to the issues identified in how CES claims are recorded. Finally, there is no clearly articulated, easily accessible information describing the process and support available for physiotherapists in receipt of a legal claim.
format Article
id doaj-art-ffd5dc93b46c4866b32202d419f4ca24
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-ffd5dc93b46c4866b32202d419f4ca242025-01-30T17:35:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-07-0112710.1136/bmjopen-2021-060023Medico-legal litigation of UK physiotherapists in relation to cauda equina syndrome: a multimethods studyGillian Yeowell0Susan Greenhalgh1James Selfe2Rachel Leech3Emma Willis4Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UKDepartment of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UKDepartment of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UKDepartment of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UKDepartment of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UKObjective The aim was to investigate the extent of cauda equina syndrome (CES) litigation and explore the process of medico-legal litigation in relation to physiotherapy in the UK.Design A multimethods inquiry that followed on from a previously conducted scoping literature review was undertaken to address the aim. This included freedom of information requests and direct communication with relevant stakeholders and organisations.Results A total of 2496 CES claims were found in the UK between 2012 and 2020. 51 of these were attributed to physiotherapists. There was little information available to physiotherapists regarding the legal process of litigation and much of this information was not from a physiotherapist’s perspective.Conclusion This is the first study that has investigated the extent and process of CES litigation in physiotherapy in the UK. The extent of CES litigation appears to be high considering CES is a rare spinal condition. Furthermore, the extent of CES litigation is suspected to be considerably higher than the data reported in this study due to the issues identified in how CES claims are recorded. Finally, there is no clearly articulated, easily accessible information describing the process and support available for physiotherapists in receipt of a legal claim.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e060023.full
spellingShingle Gillian Yeowell
Susan Greenhalgh
James Selfe
Rachel Leech
Emma Willis
Medico-legal litigation of UK physiotherapists in relation to cauda equina syndrome: a multimethods study
BMJ Open
title Medico-legal litigation of UK physiotherapists in relation to cauda equina syndrome: a multimethods study
title_full Medico-legal litigation of UK physiotherapists in relation to cauda equina syndrome: a multimethods study
title_fullStr Medico-legal litigation of UK physiotherapists in relation to cauda equina syndrome: a multimethods study
title_full_unstemmed Medico-legal litigation of UK physiotherapists in relation to cauda equina syndrome: a multimethods study
title_short Medico-legal litigation of UK physiotherapists in relation to cauda equina syndrome: a multimethods study
title_sort medico legal litigation of uk physiotherapists in relation to cauda equina syndrome a multimethods study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e060023.full
work_keys_str_mv AT gillianyeowell medicolegallitigationofukphysiotherapistsinrelationtocaudaequinasyndromeamultimethodsstudy
AT susangreenhalgh medicolegallitigationofukphysiotherapistsinrelationtocaudaequinasyndromeamultimethodsstudy
AT jamesselfe medicolegallitigationofukphysiotherapistsinrelationtocaudaequinasyndromeamultimethodsstudy
AT rachelleech medicolegallitigationofukphysiotherapistsinrelationtocaudaequinasyndromeamultimethodsstudy
AT emmawillis medicolegallitigationofukphysiotherapistsinrelationtocaudaequinasyndromeamultimethodsstudy