In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces
Current dental implant research aims at understanding the biological basis for successful implant therapy. The aim of the study was to perform a full characterization of the effect of two commercial titanium (Ti) surfaces, OsseoSpeed and TiOblast, on the behaviour of mouse preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cel...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2012-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Biomaterials |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/181024 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832559945391800320 |
---|---|
author | Marta Monjo Christiane Petzold Joana Maria Ramis Staale Petter Lyngstadaas Jan Eirik Ellingsen |
author_facet | Marta Monjo Christiane Petzold Joana Maria Ramis Staale Petter Lyngstadaas Jan Eirik Ellingsen |
author_sort | Marta Monjo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Current dental implant research aims at understanding the biological basis for successful implant therapy. The aim of the study was to perform a full characterization of the effect of two commercial titanium (Ti) surfaces, OsseoSpeed and TiOblast, on the behaviour of mouse preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells. The effect of these Ti surfaces was compared with tissue culture plastic (TCP). In vitro experiments were performed to evaluate cytotoxicity, cell morphology and proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity, gene expression, and release of a wide array of osteoblast markers. No differences were observed on cell viability and cell proliferation. However, changes were observed in cell shape after 2 days, with a more branched morphology on OsseoSpeed compared to TiOblast. Moreover, OsseoSpeed surface increased BMP-2 secretion after 2 days, and this was followed by increased IGF-I, BSP, and osterix gene expression and mineralization compared to TiOblast after 14 days. As compared to the gold standard TCP, both Ti surfaces induced higher osteocalcin and OPG release than TCP and differential temporal gene expression of osteogenic markers. The results demonstrate that the gain of using OsseoSpeed surface is an improved osteoblast differentiation and mineralization, without additional effects on cell viability or proliferation. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-ff95705e9acd4a25a087811dd71fc5fc |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-8787 1687-8795 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Biomaterials |
spelling | doaj-art-ff95705e9acd4a25a087811dd71fc5fc2025-02-03T01:28:57ZengWileyInternational Journal of Biomaterials1687-87871687-87952012-01-01201210.1155/2012/181024181024In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant SurfacesMarta Monjo0Christiane Petzold1Joana Maria Ramis2Staale Petter Lyngstadaas3Jan Eirik Ellingsen4Department of Fundamental Biology and Health Sciences, Research Institute on Health Sciences (IUNICS), University of Balearic Islands, E-07122 Palma de Mallorca, SpainDepartment of Biomaterials, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Fundamental Biology and Health Sciences, Research Institute on Health Sciences (IUNICS), University of Balearic Islands, E-07122 Palma de Mallorca, SpainDepartment of Biomaterials, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, NorwayOral Research Laboratory, Institute for Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, NorwayCurrent dental implant research aims at understanding the biological basis for successful implant therapy. The aim of the study was to perform a full characterization of the effect of two commercial titanium (Ti) surfaces, OsseoSpeed and TiOblast, on the behaviour of mouse preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells. The effect of these Ti surfaces was compared with tissue culture plastic (TCP). In vitro experiments were performed to evaluate cytotoxicity, cell morphology and proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity, gene expression, and release of a wide array of osteoblast markers. No differences were observed on cell viability and cell proliferation. However, changes were observed in cell shape after 2 days, with a more branched morphology on OsseoSpeed compared to TiOblast. Moreover, OsseoSpeed surface increased BMP-2 secretion after 2 days, and this was followed by increased IGF-I, BSP, and osterix gene expression and mineralization compared to TiOblast after 14 days. As compared to the gold standard TCP, both Ti surfaces induced higher osteocalcin and OPG release than TCP and differential temporal gene expression of osteogenic markers. The results demonstrate that the gain of using OsseoSpeed surface is an improved osteoblast differentiation and mineralization, without additional effects on cell viability or proliferation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/181024 |
spellingShingle | Marta Monjo Christiane Petzold Joana Maria Ramis Staale Petter Lyngstadaas Jan Eirik Ellingsen In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces International Journal of Biomaterials |
title | In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces |
title_full | In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces |
title_fullStr | In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces |
title_short | In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces |
title_sort | in vitro osteogenic properties of two dental implant surfaces |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/181024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martamonjo invitroosteogenicpropertiesoftwodentalimplantsurfaces AT christianepetzold invitroosteogenicpropertiesoftwodentalimplantsurfaces AT joanamariaramis invitroosteogenicpropertiesoftwodentalimplantsurfaces AT staalepetterlyngstadaas invitroosteogenicpropertiesoftwodentalimplantsurfaces AT janeirikellingsen invitroosteogenicpropertiesoftwodentalimplantsurfaces |