In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces

Current dental implant research aims at understanding the biological basis for successful implant therapy. The aim of the study was to perform a full characterization of the effect of two commercial titanium (Ti) surfaces, OsseoSpeed and TiOblast, on the behaviour of mouse preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marta Monjo, Christiane Petzold, Joana Maria Ramis, Staale Petter Lyngstadaas, Jan Eirik Ellingsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Biomaterials
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/181024
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832559945391800320
author Marta Monjo
Christiane Petzold
Joana Maria Ramis
Staale Petter Lyngstadaas
Jan Eirik Ellingsen
author_facet Marta Monjo
Christiane Petzold
Joana Maria Ramis
Staale Petter Lyngstadaas
Jan Eirik Ellingsen
author_sort Marta Monjo
collection DOAJ
description Current dental implant research aims at understanding the biological basis for successful implant therapy. The aim of the study was to perform a full characterization of the effect of two commercial titanium (Ti) surfaces, OsseoSpeed and TiOblast, on the behaviour of mouse preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells. The effect of these Ti surfaces was compared with tissue culture plastic (TCP). In vitro experiments were performed to evaluate cytotoxicity, cell morphology and proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity, gene expression, and release of a wide array of osteoblast markers. No differences were observed on cell viability and cell proliferation. However, changes were observed in cell shape after 2 days, with a more branched morphology on OsseoSpeed compared to TiOblast. Moreover, OsseoSpeed surface increased BMP-2 secretion after 2 days, and this was followed by increased IGF-I, BSP, and osterix gene expression and mineralization compared to TiOblast after 14 days. As compared to the gold standard TCP, both Ti surfaces induced higher osteocalcin and OPG release than TCP and differential temporal gene expression of osteogenic markers. The results demonstrate that the gain of using OsseoSpeed surface is an improved osteoblast differentiation and mineralization, without additional effects on cell viability or proliferation.
format Article
id doaj-art-ff95705e9acd4a25a087811dd71fc5fc
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8787
1687-8795
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Biomaterials
spelling doaj-art-ff95705e9acd4a25a087811dd71fc5fc2025-02-03T01:28:57ZengWileyInternational Journal of Biomaterials1687-87871687-87952012-01-01201210.1155/2012/181024181024In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant SurfacesMarta Monjo0Christiane Petzold1Joana Maria Ramis2Staale Petter Lyngstadaas3Jan Eirik Ellingsen4Department of Fundamental Biology and Health Sciences, Research Institute on Health Sciences (IUNICS), University of Balearic Islands, E-07122 Palma de Mallorca, SpainDepartment of Biomaterials, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Fundamental Biology and Health Sciences, Research Institute on Health Sciences (IUNICS), University of Balearic Islands, E-07122 Palma de Mallorca, SpainDepartment of Biomaterials, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, NorwayOral Research Laboratory, Institute for Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, NorwayCurrent dental implant research aims at understanding the biological basis for successful implant therapy. The aim of the study was to perform a full characterization of the effect of two commercial titanium (Ti) surfaces, OsseoSpeed and TiOblast, on the behaviour of mouse preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells. The effect of these Ti surfaces was compared with tissue culture plastic (TCP). In vitro experiments were performed to evaluate cytotoxicity, cell morphology and proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity, gene expression, and release of a wide array of osteoblast markers. No differences were observed on cell viability and cell proliferation. However, changes were observed in cell shape after 2 days, with a more branched morphology on OsseoSpeed compared to TiOblast. Moreover, OsseoSpeed surface increased BMP-2 secretion after 2 days, and this was followed by increased IGF-I, BSP, and osterix gene expression and mineralization compared to TiOblast after 14 days. As compared to the gold standard TCP, both Ti surfaces induced higher osteocalcin and OPG release than TCP and differential temporal gene expression of osteogenic markers. The results demonstrate that the gain of using OsseoSpeed surface is an improved osteoblast differentiation and mineralization, without additional effects on cell viability or proliferation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/181024
spellingShingle Marta Monjo
Christiane Petzold
Joana Maria Ramis
Staale Petter Lyngstadaas
Jan Eirik Ellingsen
In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces
International Journal of Biomaterials
title In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces
title_full In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces
title_fullStr In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces
title_short In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces
title_sort in vitro osteogenic properties of two dental implant surfaces
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/181024
work_keys_str_mv AT martamonjo invitroosteogenicpropertiesoftwodentalimplantsurfaces
AT christianepetzold invitroosteogenicpropertiesoftwodentalimplantsurfaces
AT joanamariaramis invitroosteogenicpropertiesoftwodentalimplantsurfaces
AT staalepetterlyngstadaas invitroosteogenicpropertiesoftwodentalimplantsurfaces
AT janeirikellingsen invitroosteogenicpropertiesoftwodentalimplantsurfaces