Buridan’s Sophisms, Alethic Predicates and Anaphoric Prosententialism

The article presents a unified method for diagnosis and treatment various semantic pathologies (Buridan’s sophisms, Liar-like sentences, etc.). The basis of this approach is a modified version of prosententialism, in which the terms ʽtrueʼ and ʽfalseʼ are considered as markers for the types of re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. V. Nekhaev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education 2022-09-01
Series:Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2022/%D0%A2.%207,%20%E2%84%96%203%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/49-56%20%D0%9D%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2%20%D0%90.%20%D0%92..pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The article presents a unified method for diagnosis and treatment various semantic pathologies (Buridan’s sophisms, Liar-like sentences, etc.). The basis of this approach is a modified version of prosententialism, in which the terms ʽtrueʼ and ʽfalseʼ are considered as markers for the types of relations between truth values of pathological sentences. Unlike Russell-Tarski hierarchical approach, it pays tribute to the intuitive claim of the semantic universality of natural languages (their ability to express own semantics).
ISSN:2542-0488
2541-7983