Variations in Gut Microbiome Profiles Based on Different DNA Extraction Methods: A Comparative Study
Objectives. To compare four DNA extraction methods for recovering bacterial DNA from mammalian faecal samples. Methods and Results. Three commercial kits from QIAamp, TIANamp, and MAGEN, together with the classic cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, were evaluated for their performance in e...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Yameng Liu, Xianchun Zhong, Yibin Wang, Kanglong Wang, Cuina Li, Xinyu Liang, Suqin Lin, Ru Zhou, Cen Xie |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Advanced Gut & Microbiome Research |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/6653560 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Lipidomics reveals potential biomarkers and pathophysiological insights in the progression of diabetic kidney disease
by: Xiaozhen Guo, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Improved yield and accuracy for DNA extraction in microbiome studies with variation in microbial biomass
by: Amy Davis, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Unveiling the impact of 16S rRNA gene intergenomic variation on primer design and gut microbiome profiling
by: Sirinthorn Sunthornthummas, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Interkingdom signaling between gastrointestinal hormones and the gut microbiome
by: Xinyu Zhao, et al.
Published: (2025-12-01) -
Gut microbiome and metabolome profiles in renal allograft rejection from multiomics integration
by: Xing Dai, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01)