Ab Initio Quantum Dynamics as a Scalable Solution to the Exoplanet Opacity Challenge: A Case Study of CO2 in a Hydrogen Atmosphere
Light–matter interactions lie at the heart of our exploration of exoplanetary atmospheres. Interpreting data obtained by remote sensing is enabled by meticulous, time- and resource-consuming work aiming at deepening our understanding of such interactions (i.e., opacity models). Recently, P. Niraula...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IOP Publishing
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | The Astrophysical Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adb02e |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Light–matter interactions lie at the heart of our exploration of exoplanetary atmospheres. Interpreting data obtained by remote sensing is enabled by meticulous, time- and resource-consuming work aiming at deepening our understanding of such interactions (i.e., opacity models). Recently, P. Niraula et al. pointed out that due primarily to limitations on our modeling of broadening and far-wing behaviors, opacity models needed a timely update for exoplanet exploration in the JWST era, and thus argued for a scalable approach. In this proof-of-concept study, we introduce an end-to-end solution from ab initio calculations to pressure broadening, and use a perturbation framework to address the need for precision to a level of ∼10%. We focus on the CO _2 –H _2 system as CO _2 is a key absorption feature for exoplanet research (primarily in many gas giants) at ∼4.3 μ m as pressure-broadening parameters required for interpreting such observations remain sparse. We compute elastic and inelastic cross sections for the collisions of ortho-H _2 with CO _2 , in the ground vibrational state, and at the coupled-channel fully converged level. For scattering energies above ∼20 cm ^−1 , moderate precision intermolecular potentials are indistinguishable from high-precision ones in cross sections. Our calculations agree with the currently available measurements within 7%, i.e., well beyond the precision requirements. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1538-4357 |