THE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL STUDIES

Established in accordance with the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947, the U.S. National Security Council is the main advisory body to the President of the United States tasked with helping the head of state to make the right decisions on matters related to national security. NSC system...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: V. V. Pavlov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MGIMO University Press 2016-08-01
Series:Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/606
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832579382356475904
author V. V. Pavlov
author_facet V. V. Pavlov
author_sort V. V. Pavlov
collection DOAJ
description Established in accordance with the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947, the U.S. National Security Council is the main advisory body to the President of the United States tasked with helping the head of state to make the right decisions on matters related to national security. NSC system has been constantly evolving for some 70 years, and the NSC staff became a separate 'ministry' of a kind, allowing presidential administrations to focus ever-increasing control over American foreign policy in the White House. That is why serious attention is devoted to the National Security Council by American researches studying foreign policy decision-making. Here, a 'three-pronged consensus' exists: functioning and efficiency of the decision-making process is primarily a result of presidential actions; the President will make the best decision after becoming aware of the whole range of possible alternatives and assessing the consequences of each policy option; the position of the National Security Advisor, who is often one of the closest officials to the President and serves as a coordinator of the decision-making process, is considered to be one of the most notable in today's U.S. presidential administrations - and the most influential of those not being a subject to approval by the legislative branch of U.S. government. Any fundamental changes in the practice of U.S. foreign policy mechanism, as well as a decline of the White House influence on foreign policy are unlikely in the short term.
format Article
id doaj-art-ff478fa1276c415f98e50967a0fcde7b
institution Kabale University
issn 2071-8160
2541-9099
language English
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher MGIMO University Press
record_format Article
series Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
spelling doaj-art-ff478fa1276c415f98e50967a0fcde7b2025-01-30T12:16:15ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602541-90992016-08-0104(49)18118910.24833/2071-8160-2016-4-49-181-189606THE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL STUDIESV. V. Pavlov0The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationEstablished in accordance with the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947, the U.S. National Security Council is the main advisory body to the President of the United States tasked with helping the head of state to make the right decisions on matters related to national security. NSC system has been constantly evolving for some 70 years, and the NSC staff became a separate 'ministry' of a kind, allowing presidential administrations to focus ever-increasing control over American foreign policy in the White House. That is why serious attention is devoted to the National Security Council by American researches studying foreign policy decision-making. Here, a 'three-pronged consensus' exists: functioning and efficiency of the decision-making process is primarily a result of presidential actions; the President will make the best decision after becoming aware of the whole range of possible alternatives and assessing the consequences of each policy option; the position of the National Security Advisor, who is often one of the closest officials to the President and serves as a coordinator of the decision-making process, is considered to be one of the most notable in today's U.S. presidential administrations - and the most influential of those not being a subject to approval by the legislative branch of U.S. government. Any fundamental changes in the practice of U.S. foreign policy mechanism, as well as a decline of the White House influence on foreign policy are unlikely in the short term.https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/606u.s.a.national security actnational security councilthe u.s. presidentnational security advisorthe u.s. congressforeign policy mechanismdecision-making“honest broker”
spellingShingle V. V. Pavlov
THE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
u.s.a.
national security act
national security council
the u.s. president
national security advisor
the u.s. congress
foreign policy mechanism
decision-making
“honest broker”
title THE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
title_full THE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
title_fullStr THE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
title_full_unstemmed THE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
title_short THE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
title_sort u s national security council in contemporary american international studies
topic u.s.a.
national security act
national security council
the u.s. president
national security advisor
the u.s. congress
foreign policy mechanism
decision-making
“honest broker”
url https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/606
work_keys_str_mv AT vvpavlov theusnationalsecuritycouncilincontemporaryamericaninternationalstudies
AT vvpavlov usnationalsecuritycouncilincontemporaryamericaninternationalstudies