Impaired Initiation But Not Execution of Contralesional Saccades in Hemispatial Neglect

Patients with unilateral neglect are impaired at making saccades to contralesional targets. Whether this problem arises from a deficit in perception, in planning the saccade or in executing the eye movement or some combination thereof remains unclear. We measured several variables related to the ini...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marlene Behrmann, Thea Ghiselli-Crippa, Ilaria Dimatteo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2002-01-01
Series:Behavioural Neurology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2002/253201
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560847968272384
author Marlene Behrmann
Thea Ghiselli-Crippa
Ilaria Dimatteo
author_facet Marlene Behrmann
Thea Ghiselli-Crippa
Ilaria Dimatteo
author_sort Marlene Behrmann
collection DOAJ
description Patients with unilateral neglect are impaired at making saccades to contralesional targets. Whether this problem arises from a deficit in perception, in planning the saccade or in executing the eye movement or some combination thereof remains unclear. We measured several variables related to the initiation and execution of saccades in an experiment which crossed two factors: target side (left, right) and direction of saccade (leftwards, rightwards). Relative to control subjects, patients with left-sided neglect were impaired in planning but not executing the contralesional saccade; while the latency to move their eyes following the onset of the target was increased, the duration and velocity to reach the target were normal. In addition, there were also no directional differences for saccades that were hypometric or inaccurate in the patients, further ruling out an execution impairment. Interestingly, this directional initiation deficit was exaggerated for leftward saccades to left targets, compared with all other conditions. We suggest that the disadvantage for contralesional saccades in neglect patients is attributable to a deficit not only in perceiving contralateral targets but also in planning leftward saccades. Once the saccade is initiated, however, execution apparently proceeds unimpaired.
format Article
id doaj-art-fced6d1ba8a641df8f6d6a4222cfa9da
institution Kabale University
issn 0953-4180
1875-8584
language English
publishDate 2002-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Behavioural Neurology
spelling doaj-art-fced6d1ba8a641df8f6d6a4222cfa9da2025-02-03T01:26:39ZengWileyBehavioural Neurology0953-41801875-85842002-01-01131-2396010.1155/2002/253201Impaired Initiation But Not Execution of Contralesional Saccades in Hemispatial NeglectMarlene Behrmann0Thea Ghiselli-Crippa1Ilaria Dimatteo2Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, PA, USADepartment of Information Science, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USADepartment of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, PA, USAPatients with unilateral neglect are impaired at making saccades to contralesional targets. Whether this problem arises from a deficit in perception, in planning the saccade or in executing the eye movement or some combination thereof remains unclear. We measured several variables related to the initiation and execution of saccades in an experiment which crossed two factors: target side (left, right) and direction of saccade (leftwards, rightwards). Relative to control subjects, patients with left-sided neglect were impaired in planning but not executing the contralesional saccade; while the latency to move their eyes following the onset of the target was increased, the duration and velocity to reach the target were normal. In addition, there were also no directional differences for saccades that were hypometric or inaccurate in the patients, further ruling out an execution impairment. Interestingly, this directional initiation deficit was exaggerated for leftward saccades to left targets, compared with all other conditions. We suggest that the disadvantage for contralesional saccades in neglect patients is attributable to a deficit not only in perceiving contralateral targets but also in planning leftward saccades. Once the saccade is initiated, however, execution apparently proceeds unimpaired.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2002/253201
spellingShingle Marlene Behrmann
Thea Ghiselli-Crippa
Ilaria Dimatteo
Impaired Initiation But Not Execution of Contralesional Saccades in Hemispatial Neglect
Behavioural Neurology
title Impaired Initiation But Not Execution of Contralesional Saccades in Hemispatial Neglect
title_full Impaired Initiation But Not Execution of Contralesional Saccades in Hemispatial Neglect
title_fullStr Impaired Initiation But Not Execution of Contralesional Saccades in Hemispatial Neglect
title_full_unstemmed Impaired Initiation But Not Execution of Contralesional Saccades in Hemispatial Neglect
title_short Impaired Initiation But Not Execution of Contralesional Saccades in Hemispatial Neglect
title_sort impaired initiation but not execution of contralesional saccades in hemispatial neglect
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2002/253201
work_keys_str_mv AT marlenebehrmann impairedinitiationbutnotexecutionofcontralesionalsaccadesinhemispatialneglect
AT theaghisellicrippa impairedinitiationbutnotexecutionofcontralesionalsaccadesinhemispatialneglect
AT ilariadimatteo impairedinitiationbutnotexecutionofcontralesionalsaccadesinhemispatialneglect