Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Isavuconazole Versus Amphotericin B for Patients with Invasive Mucormycosis

Background: Invasive mucormycosis (IM) poses a substantial morbidity and mortality burden among immunocompromised patients. Objectives: We aim to compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole with those of amphotericin B in patients with IM. Patients and methods: In this observati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiayuan Qin, Hongxia Bi, Guangmin Tang, Xinyao Liu, Junyan Qu, Xiaoju Lv, Yanbin Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Microorganisms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/13/1/55
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832587964423602176
author Jiayuan Qin
Hongxia Bi
Guangmin Tang
Xinyao Liu
Junyan Qu
Xiaoju Lv
Yanbin Liu
author_facet Jiayuan Qin
Hongxia Bi
Guangmin Tang
Xinyao Liu
Junyan Qu
Xiaoju Lv
Yanbin Liu
author_sort Jiayuan Qin
collection DOAJ
description Background: Invasive mucormycosis (IM) poses a substantial morbidity and mortality burden among immunocompromised patients. Objectives: We aim to compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole with those of amphotericin B in patients with IM. Patients and methods: In this observational cohort study, we enrolled patients who were diagnosed with IM and treated with either isavuconazole or amphotericin B. Results: A total of 106 patients met the study criteria. Of these, 47 received isavuconazole, and 59 received amphotericin B as the primary treatment. The two cohorts had similar baseline characteristics, including a history of malignancy, use of immunosuppressants, infection sites, and pathogens. The amphotericin B group demonstrated a significantly greater incidence of renal disorders (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and hypokalemia (<i>p</i> < 0.001) than the isavuconazole group. The proportion of patients who received salvage therapy was greater in the amphotericin B group than in the isavuconazole group (42% vs. 6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Eighteen patients in the amphotericin B group discontinued treatment because of adverse events, whereas no patients in the isavuconazole group discontinued treatment because of adverse events. A significant difference in the primary therapeutic response between the isavuconazole and amphotericin B groups was noted (<i>p</i> = 0.013), with a higher treatment failure rate in the amphotericin B group (68% vs. 36%, <i>p</i> = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in all-cause mortality or mucormycosis-attributable mortality rates between the two groups. Conclusions: Isavuconazole outperformed amphotericin B as a first-line treatment option for IM in terms of its clinical effectiveness and safety.
format Article
id doaj-art-fcaa3c482eb742efbfc8d3dd0195f754
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-2607
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Microorganisms
spelling doaj-art-fcaa3c482eb742efbfc8d3dd0195f7542025-01-24T13:42:27ZengMDPI AGMicroorganisms2076-26072025-01-011315510.3390/microorganisms13010055Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Isavuconazole Versus Amphotericin B for Patients with Invasive MucormycosisJiayuan Qin0Hongxia Bi1Guangmin Tang2Xinyao Liu3Junyan Qu4Xiaoju Lv5Yanbin Liu6Center of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu 610041, ChinaCenter of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu 610041, ChinaCenter of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu 610041, ChinaCenter for Pathogen Research, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, ChinaCenter of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu 610041, ChinaCenter of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu 610041, ChinaCenter of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu 610041, ChinaBackground: Invasive mucormycosis (IM) poses a substantial morbidity and mortality burden among immunocompromised patients. Objectives: We aim to compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole with those of amphotericin B in patients with IM. Patients and methods: In this observational cohort study, we enrolled patients who were diagnosed with IM and treated with either isavuconazole or amphotericin B. Results: A total of 106 patients met the study criteria. Of these, 47 received isavuconazole, and 59 received amphotericin B as the primary treatment. The two cohorts had similar baseline characteristics, including a history of malignancy, use of immunosuppressants, infection sites, and pathogens. The amphotericin B group demonstrated a significantly greater incidence of renal disorders (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and hypokalemia (<i>p</i> < 0.001) than the isavuconazole group. The proportion of patients who received salvage therapy was greater in the amphotericin B group than in the isavuconazole group (42% vs. 6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Eighteen patients in the amphotericin B group discontinued treatment because of adverse events, whereas no patients in the isavuconazole group discontinued treatment because of adverse events. A significant difference in the primary therapeutic response between the isavuconazole and amphotericin B groups was noted (<i>p</i> = 0.013), with a higher treatment failure rate in the amphotericin B group (68% vs. 36%, <i>p</i> = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in all-cause mortality or mucormycosis-attributable mortality rates between the two groups. Conclusions: Isavuconazole outperformed amphotericin B as a first-line treatment option for IM in terms of its clinical effectiveness and safety.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/13/1/55isavuconazoleamphotericin Binvasive mucormycosiseffectivenesssafetyreal-world
spellingShingle Jiayuan Qin
Hongxia Bi
Guangmin Tang
Xinyao Liu
Junyan Qu
Xiaoju Lv
Yanbin Liu
Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Isavuconazole Versus Amphotericin B for Patients with Invasive Mucormycosis
Microorganisms
isavuconazole
amphotericin B
invasive mucormycosis
effectiveness
safety
real-world
title Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Isavuconazole Versus Amphotericin B for Patients with Invasive Mucormycosis
title_full Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Isavuconazole Versus Amphotericin B for Patients with Invasive Mucormycosis
title_fullStr Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Isavuconazole Versus Amphotericin B for Patients with Invasive Mucormycosis
title_full_unstemmed Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Isavuconazole Versus Amphotericin B for Patients with Invasive Mucormycosis
title_short Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Isavuconazole Versus Amphotericin B for Patients with Invasive Mucormycosis
title_sort real world effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole versus amphotericin b for patients with invasive mucormycosis
topic isavuconazole
amphotericin B
invasive mucormycosis
effectiveness
safety
real-world
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/13/1/55
work_keys_str_mv AT jiayuanqin realworldeffectivenessandsafetyofisavuconazoleversusamphotericinbforpatientswithinvasivemucormycosis
AT hongxiabi realworldeffectivenessandsafetyofisavuconazoleversusamphotericinbforpatientswithinvasivemucormycosis
AT guangmintang realworldeffectivenessandsafetyofisavuconazoleversusamphotericinbforpatientswithinvasivemucormycosis
AT xinyaoliu realworldeffectivenessandsafetyofisavuconazoleversusamphotericinbforpatientswithinvasivemucormycosis
AT junyanqu realworldeffectivenessandsafetyofisavuconazoleversusamphotericinbforpatientswithinvasivemucormycosis
AT xiaojulv realworldeffectivenessandsafetyofisavuconazoleversusamphotericinbforpatientswithinvasivemucormycosis
AT yanbinliu realworldeffectivenessandsafetyofisavuconazoleversusamphotericinbforpatientswithinvasivemucormycosis