Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Isavuconazole Versus Amphotericin B for Patients with Invasive Mucormycosis
Background: Invasive mucormycosis (IM) poses a substantial morbidity and mortality burden among immunocompromised patients. Objectives: We aim to compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole with those of amphotericin B in patients with IM. Patients and methods: In this observati...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Microorganisms |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/13/1/55 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background: Invasive mucormycosis (IM) poses a substantial morbidity and mortality burden among immunocompromised patients. Objectives: We aim to compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole with those of amphotericin B in patients with IM. Patients and methods: In this observational cohort study, we enrolled patients who were diagnosed with IM and treated with either isavuconazole or amphotericin B. Results: A total of 106 patients met the study criteria. Of these, 47 received isavuconazole, and 59 received amphotericin B as the primary treatment. The two cohorts had similar baseline characteristics, including a history of malignancy, use of immunosuppressants, infection sites, and pathogens. The amphotericin B group demonstrated a significantly greater incidence of renal disorders (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and hypokalemia (<i>p</i> < 0.001) than the isavuconazole group. The proportion of patients who received salvage therapy was greater in the amphotericin B group than in the isavuconazole group (42% vs. 6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Eighteen patients in the amphotericin B group discontinued treatment because of adverse events, whereas no patients in the isavuconazole group discontinued treatment because of adverse events. A significant difference in the primary therapeutic response between the isavuconazole and amphotericin B groups was noted (<i>p</i> = 0.013), with a higher treatment failure rate in the amphotericin B group (68% vs. 36%, <i>p</i> = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in all-cause mortality or mucormycosis-attributable mortality rates between the two groups. Conclusions: Isavuconazole outperformed amphotericin B as a first-line treatment option for IM in terms of its clinical effectiveness and safety. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2076-2607 |