Impact of cooling diabetic patients’ fingertips compared to vibrating stimulation on pain from the glucometer needle: A cross-over trial study

Introduction: Blood glucose measurements using glucometers can cause discomfort due to needle insertion. Implementing effective pain management strategies is essential to alleviate this discomfort. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of cold and vibration stimulation on pain perception during g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vahid Vejdanihemmat, Hiva Azami, Leili Tapak, Shiva Borzouei, khodayar Oshvandi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:Complementary Therapies in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924001043
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582279483883520
author Vahid Vejdanihemmat
Hiva Azami
Leili Tapak
Shiva Borzouei
khodayar Oshvandi
author_facet Vahid Vejdanihemmat
Hiva Azami
Leili Tapak
Shiva Borzouei
khodayar Oshvandi
author_sort Vahid Vejdanihemmat
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Blood glucose measurements using glucometers can cause discomfort due to needle insertion. Implementing effective pain management strategies is essential to alleviate this discomfort. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of cold and vibration stimulation on pain perception during glucometer needle insertion in diabetic patients. Methods: Sixty diabetic inpatients from Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamadan, Iran, participated in a crossover study, comprising 3 individuals with type 1 diabetes and 57 with type 2 diabetes. The cohort included 40 males and 20 females, with ages ranging from 18 to 70 years and a mean age of 55.7 years. The average duration of diabetes was 10 years. The study design consisted of six blocks, each containing three interventions: vibration stimulation (A), cold therapy (B), and a combination of both C. The sequences of interventions (ABC, ACB, BCA, BAC, CBA, and CAB) were randomly assigned. Each participant received the interventions at three different times: before breakfast, one to two hours after lunch, and at dinner. One hand was randomly selected for the intervention, while the other served as a control, with only the needle inserted. Pain levels were assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for both hands. Results: Participants receiving vibration stimulation in one hand reported a significant reduction in pain intensity, with a mean difference of 1.21 (p < 0.001) compared to the control hand. In contrast, cold therapy did not significantly affect pain intensity, showing a mean difference of only 0.06 (p > 0.05). The combination of vibration and cold therapy also did not significantly alter pain intensity, yielding a mean difference of 0.33 (p > 0.05). A significant difference (p = 0.002) was noted among the interventions, indicating varying effects on pain intensity. Conclusion: Vibration stimulation effectively reduces pain associated with glucometer needle insertions. Among the methods examined, vibration stimulation proved to be the most effective for minimizing needle pain. Clinicians are encouraged to incorporate this technique into the care of diabetic patients to enhance their comfort during glucose monitoring.
format Article
id doaj-art-fc2c0ecaefd748e0b3a1a50bc075f72c
institution Kabale University
issn 0965-2299
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Complementary Therapies in Medicine
spelling doaj-art-fc2c0ecaefd748e0b3a1a50bc075f72c2025-01-30T05:12:51ZengElsevierComplementary Therapies in Medicine0965-22992025-03-0188103116Impact of cooling diabetic patients’ fingertips compared to vibrating stimulation on pain from the glucometer needle: A cross-over trial studyVahid Vejdanihemmat0Hiva Azami1Leili Tapak2Shiva Borzouei3khodayar Oshvandi4Department of Nursing, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, IranDepartment of Medical Emergencies, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IranDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IranDepartment of endocrinology, Hamadan university of medical Science, Hamadan, IranMother and Child Care Research Center, Nursing and Midwifery School, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran; Corresponding author.Introduction: Blood glucose measurements using glucometers can cause discomfort due to needle insertion. Implementing effective pain management strategies is essential to alleviate this discomfort. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of cold and vibration stimulation on pain perception during glucometer needle insertion in diabetic patients. Methods: Sixty diabetic inpatients from Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamadan, Iran, participated in a crossover study, comprising 3 individuals with type 1 diabetes and 57 with type 2 diabetes. The cohort included 40 males and 20 females, with ages ranging from 18 to 70 years and a mean age of 55.7 years. The average duration of diabetes was 10 years. The study design consisted of six blocks, each containing three interventions: vibration stimulation (A), cold therapy (B), and a combination of both C. The sequences of interventions (ABC, ACB, BCA, BAC, CBA, and CAB) were randomly assigned. Each participant received the interventions at three different times: before breakfast, one to two hours after lunch, and at dinner. One hand was randomly selected for the intervention, while the other served as a control, with only the needle inserted. Pain levels were assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for both hands. Results: Participants receiving vibration stimulation in one hand reported a significant reduction in pain intensity, with a mean difference of 1.21 (p < 0.001) compared to the control hand. In contrast, cold therapy did not significantly affect pain intensity, showing a mean difference of only 0.06 (p > 0.05). The combination of vibration and cold therapy also did not significantly alter pain intensity, yielding a mean difference of 0.33 (p > 0.05). A significant difference (p = 0.002) was noted among the interventions, indicating varying effects on pain intensity. Conclusion: Vibration stimulation effectively reduces pain associated with glucometer needle insertions. Among the methods examined, vibration stimulation proved to be the most effective for minimizing needle pain. Clinicians are encouraged to incorporate this technique into the care of diabetic patients to enhance their comfort during glucose monitoring.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924001043PainDiabetes MellitusIceVibration
spellingShingle Vahid Vejdanihemmat
Hiva Azami
Leili Tapak
Shiva Borzouei
khodayar Oshvandi
Impact of cooling diabetic patients’ fingertips compared to vibrating stimulation on pain from the glucometer needle: A cross-over trial study
Complementary Therapies in Medicine
Pain
Diabetes Mellitus
Ice
Vibration
title Impact of cooling diabetic patients’ fingertips compared to vibrating stimulation on pain from the glucometer needle: A cross-over trial study
title_full Impact of cooling diabetic patients’ fingertips compared to vibrating stimulation on pain from the glucometer needle: A cross-over trial study
title_fullStr Impact of cooling diabetic patients’ fingertips compared to vibrating stimulation on pain from the glucometer needle: A cross-over trial study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of cooling diabetic patients’ fingertips compared to vibrating stimulation on pain from the glucometer needle: A cross-over trial study
title_short Impact of cooling diabetic patients’ fingertips compared to vibrating stimulation on pain from the glucometer needle: A cross-over trial study
title_sort impact of cooling diabetic patients fingertips compared to vibrating stimulation on pain from the glucometer needle a cross over trial study
topic Pain
Diabetes Mellitus
Ice
Vibration
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924001043
work_keys_str_mv AT vahidvejdanihemmat impactofcoolingdiabeticpatientsfingertipscomparedtovibratingstimulationonpainfromtheglucometerneedleacrossovertrialstudy
AT hivaazami impactofcoolingdiabeticpatientsfingertipscomparedtovibratingstimulationonpainfromtheglucometerneedleacrossovertrialstudy
AT leilitapak impactofcoolingdiabeticpatientsfingertipscomparedtovibratingstimulationonpainfromtheglucometerneedleacrossovertrialstudy
AT shivaborzouei impactofcoolingdiabeticpatientsfingertipscomparedtovibratingstimulationonpainfromtheglucometerneedleacrossovertrialstudy
AT khodayaroshvandi impactofcoolingdiabeticpatientsfingertipscomparedtovibratingstimulationonpainfromtheglucometerneedleacrossovertrialstudy