Comparative Study of the Excavation Damage and Rockburst of the Deeply Buried Jinping II Diversion Tunnels Using a TBM and the Drilling-Blasting Method

The rock mass failure induced by high in-situ stresses during the excavation of deep diversion tunnels is one of the key problems in the construction of the Jinping II Hydropower Station. Based on the results of acoustic wave tests and rockburst statistical analysis conducted, this study focuses on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jing Yang, Xing-Guo Yang, Jia-Wen Zhou, Yong Liu, Bao-Shun Dong, Hai-Bo Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8876214
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850160934935330816
author Jing Yang
Xing-Guo Yang
Jia-Wen Zhou
Yong Liu
Bao-Shun Dong
Hai-Bo Li
author_facet Jing Yang
Xing-Guo Yang
Jia-Wen Zhou
Yong Liu
Bao-Shun Dong
Hai-Bo Li
author_sort Jing Yang
collection DOAJ
description The rock mass failure induced by high in-situ stresses during the excavation of deep diversion tunnels is one of the key problems in the construction of the Jinping II Hydropower Station. Based on the results of acoustic wave tests and rockburst statistical analysis conducted, this study focuses on the excavation damaged zone (EDZ) and rockburst events in the Jinping II diversion tunnels excavated using the tunnel boring machine (TBM) method and the drilling-blasting method. The unloading failure mechanism and the rockburst induced by the two different excavation methods were compared and analyzed. The results indicate that, due to the different stress adjustment processes, the degree of damage to the surrounding rock mass excavated using the drilling-blasting method was more serious than that using the TBM method. The EDZ induced by the TBM was usually distributed evenly along the edge of the excavation surface. While, the drilling-blasting method was more likely to cause stress concentration, resulting in a deeper EDZ in local areas. However, the TBM excavation method can cause other problems in high in-situ stress areas, such as strong rockbursts. The drilling-blasting method is more prone to structural controlled failure of the surrounding rock mass, while the TBM method would induce high stress concentration near the edge of excavation and more widely distributed of stress adjustment induced failure. As a result, the scale and frequency of the rockburst events generated by the TBM were significantly greater than those caused by the drilling-blasting method during the excavation of Jinping II diversion tunnels. The TBM method should be used carefully for tunnel excavation in high in-situ stress areas with burial depths of greater than 2000 m. If it is necessary to use the TBM method after a comprehensive selection, it is suggested that equipment adaptability improvement, advanced prediction, and prediction technology be used.
format Article
id doaj-art-fc24e6df40bf4e5cac1f0a25fce6fbb6
institution OA Journals
issn 1687-8086
1687-8094
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Civil Engineering
spelling doaj-art-fc24e6df40bf4e5cac1f0a25fce6fbb62025-08-20T02:23:00ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80861687-80942020-01-01202010.1155/2020/88762148876214Comparative Study of the Excavation Damage and Rockburst of the Deeply Buried Jinping II Diversion Tunnels Using a TBM and the Drilling-Blasting MethodJing Yang0Xing-Guo Yang1Jia-Wen Zhou2Yong Liu3Bao-Shun Dong4Hai-Bo Li5College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, ChinaCollege of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, ChinaHuaneng Tibet Yarlung Zangbo River Hydropower Development and Investment Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610061, ChinaPowerChina Huadong Engineering Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311122, ChinaCollege of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, ChinaThe rock mass failure induced by high in-situ stresses during the excavation of deep diversion tunnels is one of the key problems in the construction of the Jinping II Hydropower Station. Based on the results of acoustic wave tests and rockburst statistical analysis conducted, this study focuses on the excavation damaged zone (EDZ) and rockburst events in the Jinping II diversion tunnels excavated using the tunnel boring machine (TBM) method and the drilling-blasting method. The unloading failure mechanism and the rockburst induced by the two different excavation methods were compared and analyzed. The results indicate that, due to the different stress adjustment processes, the degree of damage to the surrounding rock mass excavated using the drilling-blasting method was more serious than that using the TBM method. The EDZ induced by the TBM was usually distributed evenly along the edge of the excavation surface. While, the drilling-blasting method was more likely to cause stress concentration, resulting in a deeper EDZ in local areas. However, the TBM excavation method can cause other problems in high in-situ stress areas, such as strong rockbursts. The drilling-blasting method is more prone to structural controlled failure of the surrounding rock mass, while the TBM method would induce high stress concentration near the edge of excavation and more widely distributed of stress adjustment induced failure. As a result, the scale and frequency of the rockburst events generated by the TBM were significantly greater than those caused by the drilling-blasting method during the excavation of Jinping II diversion tunnels. The TBM method should be used carefully for tunnel excavation in high in-situ stress areas with burial depths of greater than 2000 m. If it is necessary to use the TBM method after a comprehensive selection, it is suggested that equipment adaptability improvement, advanced prediction, and prediction technology be used.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8876214
spellingShingle Jing Yang
Xing-Guo Yang
Jia-Wen Zhou
Yong Liu
Bao-Shun Dong
Hai-Bo Li
Comparative Study of the Excavation Damage and Rockburst of the Deeply Buried Jinping II Diversion Tunnels Using a TBM and the Drilling-Blasting Method
Advances in Civil Engineering
title Comparative Study of the Excavation Damage and Rockburst of the Deeply Buried Jinping II Diversion Tunnels Using a TBM and the Drilling-Blasting Method
title_full Comparative Study of the Excavation Damage and Rockburst of the Deeply Buried Jinping II Diversion Tunnels Using a TBM and the Drilling-Blasting Method
title_fullStr Comparative Study of the Excavation Damage and Rockburst of the Deeply Buried Jinping II Diversion Tunnels Using a TBM and the Drilling-Blasting Method
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of the Excavation Damage and Rockburst of the Deeply Buried Jinping II Diversion Tunnels Using a TBM and the Drilling-Blasting Method
title_short Comparative Study of the Excavation Damage and Rockburst of the Deeply Buried Jinping II Diversion Tunnels Using a TBM and the Drilling-Blasting Method
title_sort comparative study of the excavation damage and rockburst of the deeply buried jinping ii diversion tunnels using a tbm and the drilling blasting method
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8876214
work_keys_str_mv AT jingyang comparativestudyoftheexcavationdamageandrockburstofthedeeplyburiedjinpingiidiversiontunnelsusingatbmandthedrillingblastingmethod
AT xingguoyang comparativestudyoftheexcavationdamageandrockburstofthedeeplyburiedjinpingiidiversiontunnelsusingatbmandthedrillingblastingmethod
AT jiawenzhou comparativestudyoftheexcavationdamageandrockburstofthedeeplyburiedjinpingiidiversiontunnelsusingatbmandthedrillingblastingmethod
AT yongliu comparativestudyoftheexcavationdamageandrockburstofthedeeplyburiedjinpingiidiversiontunnelsusingatbmandthedrillingblastingmethod
AT baoshundong comparativestudyoftheexcavationdamageandrockburstofthedeeplyburiedjinpingiidiversiontunnelsusingatbmandthedrillingblastingmethod
AT haiboli comparativestudyoftheexcavationdamageandrockburstofthedeeplyburiedjinpingiidiversiontunnelsusingatbmandthedrillingblastingmethod