Prediction of Visual Acuity after anti-VEGF Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema by Machine Learning

Purpose. To predict visual acuity (VA) 1 month after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) by using machine learning. Methods. This retrospective study included 281 eyes with DME receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment from January 1,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ying Zhang, Fabao Xu, Zhenzhe Lin, Jiawei Wang, Chao Huang, Min Wei, Weibin Zhai, Jianqiao Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Diabetes Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5779210
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832562647224025088
author Ying Zhang
Fabao Xu
Zhenzhe Lin
Jiawei Wang
Chao Huang
Min Wei
Weibin Zhai
Jianqiao Li
author_facet Ying Zhang
Fabao Xu
Zhenzhe Lin
Jiawei Wang
Chao Huang
Min Wei
Weibin Zhai
Jianqiao Li
author_sort Ying Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To predict visual acuity (VA) 1 month after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) by using machine learning. Methods. This retrospective study included 281 eyes with DME receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment from January 1, 2019, to April 1, 2021. Eighteen features from electronic medical records and measurements data from OCT images were extracted. The data obtained from January 1, 2019, to November 1, 2020, were used as the training set; the data obtained from November 1, 2020, to April 1, 2021, were used as the validation set. Six different machine learning algorithms were used to predict VA in patients after anti-VEGF therapy. After the initial detailed investigation, we designed an optimization model for convenient application. The VA predicted by machine learning was compared with the ground truth. Results. The ensemble algorithm (linear regression + random forest regressor) performed best in VA and VA variance predictions. In the validation set, the mean absolute errors (MAEs) of VA predictions were 0.137-0.153 logMAR (within 7-8 letters), and the mean square errors (MSEs) were 0.033-0.045 logMAR (within 2-3 letters) for the 1-month VA predictions, respectively. For the prediction of VA variance at 1 month, the MAEs were 0.164-0.169 logMAR (within 9 letters), and the MSEs were 0.056-0.059 logMAR (within 3 letters), respectively. Conclusions. Our machine learning models could accurately predict VA and VA variance in DME patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy 1 month after, which would be much valuable to guide precise individualized interventions and manage expectations in clinical practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-fc1d9f14b6974ba698bd569a55d7944b
institution Kabale University
issn 2314-6753
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Diabetes Research
spelling doaj-art-fc1d9f14b6974ba698bd569a55d7944b2025-02-03T01:22:13ZengWileyJournal of Diabetes Research2314-67532022-01-01202210.1155/2022/5779210Prediction of Visual Acuity after anti-VEGF Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema by Machine LearningYing Zhang0Fabao Xu1Zhenzhe Lin2Jiawei Wang3Chao Huang4Min Wei5Weibin Zhai6Jianqiao Li7Department of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyState Key Laboratory of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyPurpose. To predict visual acuity (VA) 1 month after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) by using machine learning. Methods. This retrospective study included 281 eyes with DME receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment from January 1, 2019, to April 1, 2021. Eighteen features from electronic medical records and measurements data from OCT images were extracted. The data obtained from January 1, 2019, to November 1, 2020, were used as the training set; the data obtained from November 1, 2020, to April 1, 2021, were used as the validation set. Six different machine learning algorithms were used to predict VA in patients after anti-VEGF therapy. After the initial detailed investigation, we designed an optimization model for convenient application. The VA predicted by machine learning was compared with the ground truth. Results. The ensemble algorithm (linear regression + random forest regressor) performed best in VA and VA variance predictions. In the validation set, the mean absolute errors (MAEs) of VA predictions were 0.137-0.153 logMAR (within 7-8 letters), and the mean square errors (MSEs) were 0.033-0.045 logMAR (within 2-3 letters) for the 1-month VA predictions, respectively. For the prediction of VA variance at 1 month, the MAEs were 0.164-0.169 logMAR (within 9 letters), and the MSEs were 0.056-0.059 logMAR (within 3 letters), respectively. Conclusions. Our machine learning models could accurately predict VA and VA variance in DME patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy 1 month after, which would be much valuable to guide precise individualized interventions and manage expectations in clinical practice.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5779210
spellingShingle Ying Zhang
Fabao Xu
Zhenzhe Lin
Jiawei Wang
Chao Huang
Min Wei
Weibin Zhai
Jianqiao Li
Prediction of Visual Acuity after anti-VEGF Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema by Machine Learning
Journal of Diabetes Research
title Prediction of Visual Acuity after anti-VEGF Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema by Machine Learning
title_full Prediction of Visual Acuity after anti-VEGF Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema by Machine Learning
title_fullStr Prediction of Visual Acuity after anti-VEGF Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema by Machine Learning
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Visual Acuity after anti-VEGF Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema by Machine Learning
title_short Prediction of Visual Acuity after anti-VEGF Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema by Machine Learning
title_sort prediction of visual acuity after anti vegf therapy in diabetic macular edema by machine learning
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5779210
work_keys_str_mv AT yingzhang predictionofvisualacuityafterantivegftherapyindiabeticmacularedemabymachinelearning
AT fabaoxu predictionofvisualacuityafterantivegftherapyindiabeticmacularedemabymachinelearning
AT zhenzhelin predictionofvisualacuityafterantivegftherapyindiabeticmacularedemabymachinelearning
AT jiaweiwang predictionofvisualacuityafterantivegftherapyindiabeticmacularedemabymachinelearning
AT chaohuang predictionofvisualacuityafterantivegftherapyindiabeticmacularedemabymachinelearning
AT minwei predictionofvisualacuityafterantivegftherapyindiabeticmacularedemabymachinelearning
AT weibinzhai predictionofvisualacuityafterantivegftherapyindiabeticmacularedemabymachinelearning
AT jianqiaoli predictionofvisualacuityafterantivegftherapyindiabeticmacularedemabymachinelearning