Comparative Study between Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peel and Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Management of Traumatic Full Thickness Macular Holes

Purpose. To compare the efficacy of PPV and ILM peel versus PPV and IFT in patients with traumatic FTMH. Methods. Retrospective interventional comparative case series including two groups of patients with traumatic FTMH. Patients were divided into group I (ILM peel) and group II (IFT). The main outc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hammouda Hamdy Ghoraba, Mahmoud Leila, Hashem Ghoraba, Mohamed Amin Heikal, Emad Eldin Mohamed Elgemai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1959082
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563057852678144
author Hammouda Hamdy Ghoraba
Mahmoud Leila
Hashem Ghoraba
Mohamed Amin Heikal
Emad Eldin Mohamed Elgemai
author_facet Hammouda Hamdy Ghoraba
Mahmoud Leila
Hashem Ghoraba
Mohamed Amin Heikal
Emad Eldin Mohamed Elgemai
author_sort Hammouda Hamdy Ghoraba
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare the efficacy of PPV and ILM peel versus PPV and IFT in patients with traumatic FTMH. Methods. Retrospective interventional comparative case series including two groups of patients with traumatic FTMH. Patients were divided into group I (ILM peel) and group II (IFT). The main outcome measure was closure of the macular hole and restoration of the foveal microstructure. The independent-samples T-test and ANOVA test were used to study the mean between 2 groups and calculate the P value, whereas the bivariate correlation procedure studied the interaction between the variables tested. Results. Group I included 28 patients. Mean preoperative MLD was 757 µm. Mean preoperative BCVA was approximately 20/320. Group II included 12 patients. Mean preoperative MLD was 529.5 µm. Mean preoperative BCVA was 20/320. Group I had a macular hole closure rate of 75% versus 92% in group II P=0.05. Mean BCVA improvement was 2.5 lines in group I versus 5 lines in group II P=0.02. Disrupted ELM and IS/OS was the most salient finding in both groups. Conclusion. IFT has a significantly superior anatomic and functional outcome compared to ILM peel in traumatic FTMH.
format Article
id doaj-art-fc12a0237db243a1a83692e6f5b2ae6e
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-fc12a0237db243a1a83692e6f5b2ae6e2025-02-03T01:21:12ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582019-01-01201910.1155/2019/19590821959082Comparative Study between Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peel and Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Management of Traumatic Full Thickness Macular HolesHammouda Hamdy Ghoraba0Mahmoud Leila1Hashem Ghoraba2Mohamed Amin Heikal3Emad Eldin Mohamed Elgemai4Professor of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, EgyptAssociate Professor of Ophthalmology, Retina Department, Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, EgyptOphthalmology Specialist, Magrabi Eye Hospital, Tanta, EgyptAssistant Professor of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, EgyptOphthalmology Consultant, Damanhour Teaching Hospital, Damanhour, EgyptPurpose. To compare the efficacy of PPV and ILM peel versus PPV and IFT in patients with traumatic FTMH. Methods. Retrospective interventional comparative case series including two groups of patients with traumatic FTMH. Patients were divided into group I (ILM peel) and group II (IFT). The main outcome measure was closure of the macular hole and restoration of the foveal microstructure. The independent-samples T-test and ANOVA test were used to study the mean between 2 groups and calculate the P value, whereas the bivariate correlation procedure studied the interaction between the variables tested. Results. Group I included 28 patients. Mean preoperative MLD was 757 µm. Mean preoperative BCVA was approximately 20/320. Group II included 12 patients. Mean preoperative MLD was 529.5 µm. Mean preoperative BCVA was 20/320. Group I had a macular hole closure rate of 75% versus 92% in group II P=0.05. Mean BCVA improvement was 2.5 lines in group I versus 5 lines in group II P=0.02. Disrupted ELM and IS/OS was the most salient finding in both groups. Conclusion. IFT has a significantly superior anatomic and functional outcome compared to ILM peel in traumatic FTMH.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1959082
spellingShingle Hammouda Hamdy Ghoraba
Mahmoud Leila
Hashem Ghoraba
Mohamed Amin Heikal
Emad Eldin Mohamed Elgemai
Comparative Study between Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peel and Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Management of Traumatic Full Thickness Macular Holes
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Comparative Study between Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peel and Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Management of Traumatic Full Thickness Macular Holes
title_full Comparative Study between Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peel and Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Management of Traumatic Full Thickness Macular Holes
title_fullStr Comparative Study between Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peel and Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Management of Traumatic Full Thickness Macular Holes
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study between Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peel and Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Management of Traumatic Full Thickness Macular Holes
title_short Comparative Study between Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peel and Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Management of Traumatic Full Thickness Macular Holes
title_sort comparative study between pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peel and pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap technique for management of traumatic full thickness macular holes
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1959082
work_keys_str_mv AT hammoudahamdyghoraba comparativestudybetweenparsplanavitrectomywithinternallimitingmembranepeelandparsplanavitrectomywithinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueformanagementoftraumaticfullthicknessmacularholes
AT mahmoudleila comparativestudybetweenparsplanavitrectomywithinternallimitingmembranepeelandparsplanavitrectomywithinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueformanagementoftraumaticfullthicknessmacularholes
AT hashemghoraba comparativestudybetweenparsplanavitrectomywithinternallimitingmembranepeelandparsplanavitrectomywithinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueformanagementoftraumaticfullthicknessmacularholes
AT mohamedaminheikal comparativestudybetweenparsplanavitrectomywithinternallimitingmembranepeelandparsplanavitrectomywithinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueformanagementoftraumaticfullthicknessmacularholes
AT emadeldinmohamedelgemai comparativestudybetweenparsplanavitrectomywithinternallimitingmembranepeelandparsplanavitrectomywithinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniqueformanagementoftraumaticfullthicknessmacularholes