Les biens communs vécus, une finalité non utilitaire
In this essay, the author discusses the notion of « lived common goods. » Lived common goods must answer three criteria : non-rivalry, non-exclusion, and third, being several persons is the condition for these goods to be produced and experienced. Further, they are immaterial. The author illustrates...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles
2008-03-01
|
Series: | Développement Durable et Territoires |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/5173 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832095680530743296 |
---|---|
author | François Flahault |
author_facet | François Flahault |
author_sort | François Flahault |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this essay, the author discusses the notion of « lived common goods. » Lived common goods must answer three criteria : non-rivalry, non-exclusion, and third, being several persons is the condition for these goods to be produced and experienced. Further, they are immaterial. The author illustrates the notion through a series of examples, one being conversation. Finally, he shows how the notion can contribute to expand ecological thought to human psychic life. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-fc11553f170a4e84afa27bb93bd526c5 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1772-9971 |
language | fra |
publishDate | 2008-03-01 |
publisher | Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles |
record_format | Article |
series | Développement Durable et Territoires |
spelling | doaj-art-fc11553f170a4e84afa27bb93bd526c52025-02-05T16:34:34ZfraRéseau Développement Durable et Territoires FragilesDéveloppement Durable et Territoires1772-99712008-03-011010.4000/developpementdurable.5173Les biens communs vécus, une finalité non utilitaireFrançois FlahaultIn this essay, the author discusses the notion of « lived common goods. » Lived common goods must answer three criteria : non-rivalry, non-exclusion, and third, being several persons is the condition for these goods to be produced and experienced. Further, they are immaterial. The author illustrates the notion through a series of examples, one being conversation. Finally, he shows how the notion can contribute to expand ecological thought to human psychic life.https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/5173ecologyCommon goodsimmaterialsocial bond |
spellingShingle | François Flahault Les biens communs vécus, une finalité non utilitaire Développement Durable et Territoires ecology Common goods immaterial social bond |
title | Les biens communs vécus, une finalité non utilitaire |
title_full | Les biens communs vécus, une finalité non utilitaire |
title_fullStr | Les biens communs vécus, une finalité non utilitaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Les biens communs vécus, une finalité non utilitaire |
title_short | Les biens communs vécus, une finalité non utilitaire |
title_sort | les biens communs vecus une finalite non utilitaire |
topic | ecology Common goods immaterial social bond |
url | https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/5173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT francoisflahault lesbienscommunsvecusunefinalitenonutilitaire |