Variation Comparison of OLS and GLS Estimators using Monte Carlo Simulation of Linear Regression Model with Autoregressive Scheme

In this research we discusses to Ordinary Least Squares and Generalized Least Squares techniques and estimate with First Order Autoregressive scheme from different correlation levels by using simple linear regression model. A comparison has been made between these two methods on the basis of varian...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sajid AliKhan, Sayyad Khurshid, Tooba Akhtar, Kashmala Khurshid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Qubahan 2021-02-01
Series:Qubahan Academic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.qubahan.com/index.php/qaj/article/view/22
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832544520705671168
author Sajid AliKhan
Sayyad Khurshid
Tooba Akhtar
Kashmala Khurshid
author_facet Sajid AliKhan
Sayyad Khurshid
Tooba Akhtar
Kashmala Khurshid
author_sort Sajid AliKhan
collection DOAJ
description In this research we discusses to Ordinary Least Squares and Generalized Least Squares techniques and estimate with First Order Autoregressive scheme from different correlation levels by using simple linear regression model. A comparison has been made between these two methods on the basis of variances results. For the purpose of comparison, we use simulation of Monte Carlo study and the experiment is repeated 5000 times. We use sample sizes 50, 100, 200, 300 and 500, and observe the influence of different sample sizes on the estimators. By comparing variances of OLS and GLS at different values of sample sizes and correlation levels with , we found that variance of ( ) at sample size 500, OLS and GLS gives similar results but at sample size 50 variance of GLS ( ) has minimum values as compared to OLS. So it is clear that variance of GLS ( ) is best. Similarly variance of ( ) from OLS and GLS at sample size 500 and correlation -0.05 with , GLS give minimum value as compared to all other sample sizes and correlations. By comparing overall results of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Generalized Least Squares (GLS), we conclude that in large samples both are gives similar results but small samples GLS is best fitted as compared to OLS.
format Article
id doaj-art-fbf7b4c53e50467782c6f6a196c82898
institution Kabale University
issn 2709-8206
language English
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Qubahan
record_format Article
series Qubahan Academic Journal
spelling doaj-art-fbf7b4c53e50467782c6f6a196c828982025-02-03T10:12:59ZengQubahanQubahan Academic Journal2709-82062021-02-011110.48161/qaj.v1n1a2222Variation Comparison of OLS and GLS Estimators using Monte Carlo Simulation of Linear Regression Model with Autoregressive SchemeSajid AliKhan0Sayyad Khurshid1Tooba Akhtar2Kashmala Khurshid3Green Hills College RawalakotGovernment Postgraduate College Boys Rawalakot AJK Rawalakot, PakistanGovernment Postgraduate College Boys Rawalakot AJK Rawalakot, PakistanGovernment Postgraduate College Boys Rawalakot AJK Rawalakot, Pakistan In this research we discusses to Ordinary Least Squares and Generalized Least Squares techniques and estimate with First Order Autoregressive scheme from different correlation levels by using simple linear regression model. A comparison has been made between these two methods on the basis of variances results. For the purpose of comparison, we use simulation of Monte Carlo study and the experiment is repeated 5000 times. We use sample sizes 50, 100, 200, 300 and 500, and observe the influence of different sample sizes on the estimators. By comparing variances of OLS and GLS at different values of sample sizes and correlation levels with , we found that variance of ( ) at sample size 500, OLS and GLS gives similar results but at sample size 50 variance of GLS ( ) has minimum values as compared to OLS. So it is clear that variance of GLS ( ) is best. Similarly variance of ( ) from OLS and GLS at sample size 500 and correlation -0.05 with , GLS give minimum value as compared to all other sample sizes and correlations. By comparing overall results of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Generalized Least Squares (GLS), we conclude that in large samples both are gives similar results but small samples GLS is best fitted as compared to OLS. https://journal.qubahan.com/index.php/qaj/article/view/22OLSGLSMONTE CARLO
spellingShingle Sajid AliKhan
Sayyad Khurshid
Tooba Akhtar
Kashmala Khurshid
Variation Comparison of OLS and GLS Estimators using Monte Carlo Simulation of Linear Regression Model with Autoregressive Scheme
Qubahan Academic Journal
OLS
GLS
MONTE CARLO
title Variation Comparison of OLS and GLS Estimators using Monte Carlo Simulation of Linear Regression Model with Autoregressive Scheme
title_full Variation Comparison of OLS and GLS Estimators using Monte Carlo Simulation of Linear Regression Model with Autoregressive Scheme
title_fullStr Variation Comparison of OLS and GLS Estimators using Monte Carlo Simulation of Linear Regression Model with Autoregressive Scheme
title_full_unstemmed Variation Comparison of OLS and GLS Estimators using Monte Carlo Simulation of Linear Regression Model with Autoregressive Scheme
title_short Variation Comparison of OLS and GLS Estimators using Monte Carlo Simulation of Linear Regression Model with Autoregressive Scheme
title_sort variation comparison of ols and gls estimators using monte carlo simulation of linear regression model with autoregressive scheme
topic OLS
GLS
MONTE CARLO
url https://journal.qubahan.com/index.php/qaj/article/view/22
work_keys_str_mv AT sajidalikhan variationcomparisonofolsandglsestimatorsusingmontecarlosimulationoflinearregressionmodelwithautoregressivescheme
AT sayyadkhurshid variationcomparisonofolsandglsestimatorsusingmontecarlosimulationoflinearregressionmodelwithautoregressivescheme
AT toobaakhtar variationcomparisonofolsandglsestimatorsusingmontecarlosimulationoflinearregressionmodelwithautoregressivescheme
AT kashmalakhurshid variationcomparisonofolsandglsestimatorsusingmontecarlosimulationoflinearregressionmodelwithautoregressivescheme