Evaluation of Content Quality of Online Health Information by Global Quality Score: A Case Study of Researchers Misnaming It and Citing Secondary Sources
The Global Quality Score (GQS) is one of the most frequently used tools to evaluate the content quality of online health information. To the author’s knowledge, it is frequently misnamed as the Global Quality Scale, and occasionally secondary sources are cited as the original source of the tool. Thi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Andy Wai Kan Yeung |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Publications |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/13/2/23 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Where did this come from? When (not how) to cite sources in scientific publications
by: Thomas A. Lang
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Is Citation Count a Legitimate Indicator of Scientific Impact? A Case Study of Upper (1974) “The Unsuccessful Self-Treatment of a Case of Writer’s Block” and Its Derivatives
by: Andy Wai Kan Yeung
Published: (2024-10-01) -
Analysis of 100 most cited articles on forensic odontology
by: Namrata Sengupta, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
uCite: The union of nine large-scale public PubMed citation datasets with reliability filteringIllinois Data Bank
by: Liri Fang, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
30 years of Information Research papers citing Professor Tom D. Wilson: a bibliometric analysis
by: Tanja Svarre, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01)