Evaluation of Public Welfare Level of Urban Rail Transit considering Operation Management

Evaluating the public welfare level of the urban rail transit systems has not only great significance for the government to provide fair and reasonable subsidies but for the better operation and management of urban rail transit enterprises. An evaluation index system composed of 3 criterion-level in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ran Meng, Baohua Mao, Qi Xu, Yang Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Advanced Transportation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1245639
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563886093500416
author Ran Meng
Baohua Mao
Qi Xu
Yang Yang
author_facet Ran Meng
Baohua Mao
Qi Xu
Yang Yang
author_sort Ran Meng
collection DOAJ
description Evaluating the public welfare level of the urban rail transit systems has not only great significance for the government to provide fair and reasonable subsidies but for the better operation and management of urban rail transit enterprises. An evaluation index system composed of 3 criterion-level indicators and 12 subindexes has been established in this paper. The 3 criterion-level indicators conclude service level, social benefit, and policy loss which are all affected by operation management. Besides, the subjective and objective comprehensive weighting method combined with the analytic hierarchy process method and the entropy weight method is proposed to calculate the index-level weights. Furtherly, the grey correlation-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation method was designed to calculate the comprehensive evaluation value of the public welfare level of each city. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, urban rail transit systems in 16 Chinese cities are studied as a case study. The results show that (1) the three indicators of passenger travel cost (25.69%), the increase in housing prices around urban rail transit(10.74%), and operating cost ratio(9.95%) are more likely to affect the evaluation of public welfare level of urban rail transit. (2) the level of public welfare in different cities is not balanced. The cities with a relatively high level of public welfare relative closeness exceeding 0.5 include Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Suzhou, Wuhan, Nanjing, Wuxi, and Dalian. (3) Both GDP and urban population are positively correlated with the relative closeness of social benefit and service level. (4) The level of public welfare can be improved by reducing the fare price and improving the service level, such as increasing the network density, reducing the departure interval, and increasing the average speed.
format Article
id doaj-art-fb3ddccf690e4a799eb3b849390a0145
institution Kabale University
issn 2042-3195
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Advanced Transportation
spelling doaj-art-fb3ddccf690e4a799eb3b849390a01452025-02-03T01:12:22ZengWileyJournal of Advanced Transportation2042-31952022-01-01202210.1155/2022/1245639Evaluation of Public Welfare Level of Urban Rail Transit considering Operation ManagementRan Meng0Baohua Mao1Qi Xu2Yang Yang3Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive TransportKey Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive TransportKey Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive TransportSchool of Transportation Science and EngineeringEvaluating the public welfare level of the urban rail transit systems has not only great significance for the government to provide fair and reasonable subsidies but for the better operation and management of urban rail transit enterprises. An evaluation index system composed of 3 criterion-level indicators and 12 subindexes has been established in this paper. The 3 criterion-level indicators conclude service level, social benefit, and policy loss which are all affected by operation management. Besides, the subjective and objective comprehensive weighting method combined with the analytic hierarchy process method and the entropy weight method is proposed to calculate the index-level weights. Furtherly, the grey correlation-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation method was designed to calculate the comprehensive evaluation value of the public welfare level of each city. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, urban rail transit systems in 16 Chinese cities are studied as a case study. The results show that (1) the three indicators of passenger travel cost (25.69%), the increase in housing prices around urban rail transit(10.74%), and operating cost ratio(9.95%) are more likely to affect the evaluation of public welfare level of urban rail transit. (2) the level of public welfare in different cities is not balanced. The cities with a relatively high level of public welfare relative closeness exceeding 0.5 include Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Suzhou, Wuhan, Nanjing, Wuxi, and Dalian. (3) Both GDP and urban population are positively correlated with the relative closeness of social benefit and service level. (4) The level of public welfare can be improved by reducing the fare price and improving the service level, such as increasing the network density, reducing the departure interval, and increasing the average speed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1245639
spellingShingle Ran Meng
Baohua Mao
Qi Xu
Yang Yang
Evaluation of Public Welfare Level of Urban Rail Transit considering Operation Management
Journal of Advanced Transportation
title Evaluation of Public Welfare Level of Urban Rail Transit considering Operation Management
title_full Evaluation of Public Welfare Level of Urban Rail Transit considering Operation Management
title_fullStr Evaluation of Public Welfare Level of Urban Rail Transit considering Operation Management
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Public Welfare Level of Urban Rail Transit considering Operation Management
title_short Evaluation of Public Welfare Level of Urban Rail Transit considering Operation Management
title_sort evaluation of public welfare level of urban rail transit considering operation management
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1245639
work_keys_str_mv AT ranmeng evaluationofpublicwelfarelevelofurbanrailtransitconsideringoperationmanagement
AT baohuamao evaluationofpublicwelfarelevelofurbanrailtransitconsideringoperationmanagement
AT qixu evaluationofpublicwelfarelevelofurbanrailtransitconsideringoperationmanagement
AT yangyang evaluationofpublicwelfarelevelofurbanrailtransitconsideringoperationmanagement