Surgical Procedures Used for Correction of Scheuermann’s Kyphosis: A Meta-Analysis

Objectives. Scheuermann’s kyphosis can cause severe back pain and cosmetic disorders to patients. Previous studies on surgical procedure selection for correction of Scheuermann’s kyphosis have drawn controversial conclusions. Here, a meta-analysis was performed to figure out a better way between ant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Qingshan Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2142964
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560640595591168
author Qingshan Li
author_facet Qingshan Li
author_sort Qingshan Li
collection DOAJ
description Objectives. Scheuermann’s kyphosis can cause severe back pain and cosmetic disorders to patients. Previous studies on surgical procedure selection for correction of Scheuermann’s kyphosis have drawn controversial conclusions. Here, a meta-analysis was performed to figure out a better way between anterior-posterior (AP) combined procedures and posterior-only (PO) procedures. Methods. We searched PubMed database and Ovid database, as well as Cochrane Library (between January 2009 and December 2020, around recent ten years), for studies reporting Scheuermann’s kyphosis correction in an anterior way or a posterior way. Random effects meta-analysis regarding correction degrees and incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) was performed. Results. Finally, 13 unique studies including 586 patients (AP: 300; PO: 286) were identified and included for this meta-analysis. Overall, 6 AP cohorts and 10 PO cohorts were pooled regarding the correction degrees of kyphosis in the analysis, respectively. Pooled correction degrees in AP cohorts were 33.31 (95% CI: 27.48–39.15; I2 = 86%, P<0.001) and in PO cohorts were 31.16 (95% CI: 26.97–35.35; I2 = 81.1%, P<0.001). Comparison of correction between AP and PO cohorts did not indicate any significant difference. Likewise, postoperative PJK incidence showed no difference. Back pain can be caused by both AP and PO procedures, but which causes less pain remains to be conclusive. The PO approach showed less blood loss and shorter surgical duration as compared to the AP approach. Conclusions. In summary, this meta-analysis shows similar treatment effects between AP and PO procedures in correcting Scheuermann’s kyphosis, suggesting the advantage of PO procedures due to less blood loss and surgical duration. However, the postoperative complications PJK and distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) cannot be well concluded due to the limitation of existing data.
format Article
id doaj-art-fb26f103a50b4f9cb6764f95c0edbe0e
institution Kabale University
issn 1203-6765
1918-1523
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pain Research and Management
spelling doaj-art-fb26f103a50b4f9cb6764f95c0edbe0e2025-02-03T01:27:07ZengWileyPain Research and Management1203-67651918-15232021-01-01202110.1155/2021/21429642142964Surgical Procedures Used for Correction of Scheuermann’s Kyphosis: A Meta-AnalysisQingshan Li0Fourth Department of Orthopedics, Handan Central Hospital of Hebei Province, Handan 056001, ChinaObjectives. Scheuermann’s kyphosis can cause severe back pain and cosmetic disorders to patients. Previous studies on surgical procedure selection for correction of Scheuermann’s kyphosis have drawn controversial conclusions. Here, a meta-analysis was performed to figure out a better way between anterior-posterior (AP) combined procedures and posterior-only (PO) procedures. Methods. We searched PubMed database and Ovid database, as well as Cochrane Library (between January 2009 and December 2020, around recent ten years), for studies reporting Scheuermann’s kyphosis correction in an anterior way or a posterior way. Random effects meta-analysis regarding correction degrees and incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) was performed. Results. Finally, 13 unique studies including 586 patients (AP: 300; PO: 286) were identified and included for this meta-analysis. Overall, 6 AP cohorts and 10 PO cohorts were pooled regarding the correction degrees of kyphosis in the analysis, respectively. Pooled correction degrees in AP cohorts were 33.31 (95% CI: 27.48–39.15; I2 = 86%, P<0.001) and in PO cohorts were 31.16 (95% CI: 26.97–35.35; I2 = 81.1%, P<0.001). Comparison of correction between AP and PO cohorts did not indicate any significant difference. Likewise, postoperative PJK incidence showed no difference. Back pain can be caused by both AP and PO procedures, but which causes less pain remains to be conclusive. The PO approach showed less blood loss and shorter surgical duration as compared to the AP approach. Conclusions. In summary, this meta-analysis shows similar treatment effects between AP and PO procedures in correcting Scheuermann’s kyphosis, suggesting the advantage of PO procedures due to less blood loss and surgical duration. However, the postoperative complications PJK and distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) cannot be well concluded due to the limitation of existing data.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2142964
spellingShingle Qingshan Li
Surgical Procedures Used for Correction of Scheuermann’s Kyphosis: A Meta-Analysis
Pain Research and Management
title Surgical Procedures Used for Correction of Scheuermann’s Kyphosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Surgical Procedures Used for Correction of Scheuermann’s Kyphosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Surgical Procedures Used for Correction of Scheuermann’s Kyphosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Procedures Used for Correction of Scheuermann’s Kyphosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Surgical Procedures Used for Correction of Scheuermann’s Kyphosis: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort surgical procedures used for correction of scheuermann s kyphosis a meta analysis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2142964
work_keys_str_mv AT qingshanli surgicalproceduresusedforcorrectionofscheuermannskyphosisametaanalysis