Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in the Rubinstein Bargaining Game with Loss Aversion

Rubinstein bargaining game is extended to incorporate loss aversion, where the initial reference points are not zero. Under the assumption that the highest rejected proposal of the opponent last periods is regarded as the associated reference point, we investigate the effect of loss aversion and ini...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhongwei Feng, Chunqiao Tan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Complexity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5108652
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850161904022978560
author Zhongwei Feng
Chunqiao Tan
author_facet Zhongwei Feng
Chunqiao Tan
author_sort Zhongwei Feng
collection DOAJ
description Rubinstein bargaining game is extended to incorporate loss aversion, where the initial reference points are not zero. Under the assumption that the highest rejected proposal of the opponent last periods is regarded as the associated reference point, we investigate the effect of loss aversion and initial reference points on subgame perfect equilibrium. Firstly, a subgame perfect equilibrium is constructed. And its uniqueness is shown. Furthermore, we analyze this equilibrium with respect to initial reference points, loss aversion coefficients, and discount factor. It is shown that one benefits from his opponent’s loss aversion coefficient and his own initial reference point and is hurt by loss aversion coefficient of himself and the opponent’s initial reference point. Moreover, it is found that, for a player who has a higher level of loss aversion than the other, although this player has a higher initial reference point than the opponent, this player can(not) obtain a high share of the pie if the level of loss aversion of this player is sufficiently low (high). Finally, a relation with asymmetric Nash bargaining is established, where player’s bargaining power is negatively related to his own loss aversion and the initial reference point of the other and positively related to loss aversion of the opponent and his own initial reference point.
format Article
id doaj-art-f9cea633cc624a8f9d5eb3d0ba99cde1
institution OA Journals
issn 1076-2787
1099-0526
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Complexity
spelling doaj-art-f9cea633cc624a8f9d5eb3d0ba99cde12025-08-20T02:22:41ZengWileyComplexity1076-27871099-05262019-01-01201910.1155/2019/51086525108652Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in the Rubinstein Bargaining Game with Loss AversionZhongwei Feng0Chunqiao Tan1School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, ChinaSchool of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, ChinaRubinstein bargaining game is extended to incorporate loss aversion, where the initial reference points are not zero. Under the assumption that the highest rejected proposal of the opponent last periods is regarded as the associated reference point, we investigate the effect of loss aversion and initial reference points on subgame perfect equilibrium. Firstly, a subgame perfect equilibrium is constructed. And its uniqueness is shown. Furthermore, we analyze this equilibrium with respect to initial reference points, loss aversion coefficients, and discount factor. It is shown that one benefits from his opponent’s loss aversion coefficient and his own initial reference point and is hurt by loss aversion coefficient of himself and the opponent’s initial reference point. Moreover, it is found that, for a player who has a higher level of loss aversion than the other, although this player has a higher initial reference point than the opponent, this player can(not) obtain a high share of the pie if the level of loss aversion of this player is sufficiently low (high). Finally, a relation with asymmetric Nash bargaining is established, where player’s bargaining power is negatively related to his own loss aversion and the initial reference point of the other and positively related to loss aversion of the opponent and his own initial reference point.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5108652
spellingShingle Zhongwei Feng
Chunqiao Tan
Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in the Rubinstein Bargaining Game with Loss Aversion
Complexity
title Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in the Rubinstein Bargaining Game with Loss Aversion
title_full Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in the Rubinstein Bargaining Game with Loss Aversion
title_fullStr Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in the Rubinstein Bargaining Game with Loss Aversion
title_full_unstemmed Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in the Rubinstein Bargaining Game with Loss Aversion
title_short Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in the Rubinstein Bargaining Game with Loss Aversion
title_sort subgame perfect equilibrium in the rubinstein bargaining game with loss aversion
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5108652
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongweifeng subgameperfectequilibriumintherubinsteinbargaininggamewithlossaversion
AT chunqiaotan subgameperfectequilibriumintherubinsteinbargaininggamewithlossaversion