Two-Phase Flow Model for Numerical Investigation of Impact of Water Retention on Shale Gas Production

In this work, a triple-porosity, two-phase flow model was established to fill the knowledge gap of previous models focusing on gas production characteristics while ignoring the impacts of water injection. The proposed model considers the water flow in the fracture systems and clay minerals and the g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ershe Xu, Lingjie Yu, Ming Fan, Tianyu Chen, Zhejun Pan, Yuling Tan, Guanglei Cui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Geofluids
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2637217
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551990666723328
author Ershe Xu
Lingjie Yu
Ming Fan
Tianyu Chen
Zhejun Pan
Yuling Tan
Guanglei Cui
author_facet Ershe Xu
Lingjie Yu
Ming Fan
Tianyu Chen
Zhejun Pan
Yuling Tan
Guanglei Cui
author_sort Ershe Xu
collection DOAJ
description In this work, a triple-porosity, two-phase flow model was established to fill the knowledge gap of previous models focusing on gas production characteristics while ignoring the impacts of water injection. The proposed model considers the water flow in the fracture systems and clay minerals and the gas flow in the organic matter, inorganic pore, and fracture systems. The proposed model is solved using a finite element approach with COMSOL Multiphysics (Version 5.6) and verified with field data. Then, the evolutions of the intrinsic and relative permeabilities during water injection and gas production are examined. Furthermore, the impacts of water injection time and pressure are investigated. Good verification results are obtained; the goodness-of-fit value is 0.92, indicating that the proposed model can replicate both the water stimulation and the gas production stages. The relative gas permeability declines during water injection but recovers in the gas depletion stage. Furthermore, the intrinsic permeability increases during the water injection stage but decreases during the gas production stage. A higher water injection pressure and longer injection time would enlarge the intrinsic permeability, thus improving flow capacity. However, it would reduce gas relative permeability, thereby hindering gas flow. The shale gas production characteristic is controlled by the two abovementioned competing mechanisms. There exists a perfect combination of water injection pressure and injection time for achieving the maximum profitability of a shale gas well. This work can give a better understanding of the two-phase flow process in shale reservoirs and shed light on the field application of hydraulic fracturing.
format Article
id doaj-art-f91baf1f3a22444f8cde0e0a6626b804
institution Kabale University
issn 1468-8123
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geofluids
spelling doaj-art-f91baf1f3a22444f8cde0e0a6626b8042025-02-03T05:59:58ZengWileyGeofluids1468-81232021-01-01202110.1155/2021/2637217Two-Phase Flow Model for Numerical Investigation of Impact of Water Retention on Shale Gas ProductionErshe Xu0Lingjie Yu1Ming Fan2Tianyu Chen3Zhejun Pan4Yuling Tan5Guanglei Cui6Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum GeologyWuxi Research Institute of Petroleum GeologyWuxi Research Institute of Petroleum GeologyKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education on Safe Mining of Deep Metal MinesKey Laboratory of Continental Shale Hydrocarbon Accumulation and Efficient DevelopmentDepartment of Engineering MechanicsKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education on Safe Mining of Deep Metal MinesIn this work, a triple-porosity, two-phase flow model was established to fill the knowledge gap of previous models focusing on gas production characteristics while ignoring the impacts of water injection. The proposed model considers the water flow in the fracture systems and clay minerals and the gas flow in the organic matter, inorganic pore, and fracture systems. The proposed model is solved using a finite element approach with COMSOL Multiphysics (Version 5.6) and verified with field data. Then, the evolutions of the intrinsic and relative permeabilities during water injection and gas production are examined. Furthermore, the impacts of water injection time and pressure are investigated. Good verification results are obtained; the goodness-of-fit value is 0.92, indicating that the proposed model can replicate both the water stimulation and the gas production stages. The relative gas permeability declines during water injection but recovers in the gas depletion stage. Furthermore, the intrinsic permeability increases during the water injection stage but decreases during the gas production stage. A higher water injection pressure and longer injection time would enlarge the intrinsic permeability, thus improving flow capacity. However, it would reduce gas relative permeability, thereby hindering gas flow. The shale gas production characteristic is controlled by the two abovementioned competing mechanisms. There exists a perfect combination of water injection pressure and injection time for achieving the maximum profitability of a shale gas well. This work can give a better understanding of the two-phase flow process in shale reservoirs and shed light on the field application of hydraulic fracturing.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2637217
spellingShingle Ershe Xu
Lingjie Yu
Ming Fan
Tianyu Chen
Zhejun Pan
Yuling Tan
Guanglei Cui
Two-Phase Flow Model for Numerical Investigation of Impact of Water Retention on Shale Gas Production
Geofluids
title Two-Phase Flow Model for Numerical Investigation of Impact of Water Retention on Shale Gas Production
title_full Two-Phase Flow Model for Numerical Investigation of Impact of Water Retention on Shale Gas Production
title_fullStr Two-Phase Flow Model for Numerical Investigation of Impact of Water Retention on Shale Gas Production
title_full_unstemmed Two-Phase Flow Model for Numerical Investigation of Impact of Water Retention on Shale Gas Production
title_short Two-Phase Flow Model for Numerical Investigation of Impact of Water Retention on Shale Gas Production
title_sort two phase flow model for numerical investigation of impact of water retention on shale gas production
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2637217
work_keys_str_mv AT ershexu twophaseflowmodelfornumericalinvestigationofimpactofwaterretentiononshalegasproduction
AT lingjieyu twophaseflowmodelfornumericalinvestigationofimpactofwaterretentiononshalegasproduction
AT mingfan twophaseflowmodelfornumericalinvestigationofimpactofwaterretentiononshalegasproduction
AT tianyuchen twophaseflowmodelfornumericalinvestigationofimpactofwaterretentiononshalegasproduction
AT zhejunpan twophaseflowmodelfornumericalinvestigationofimpactofwaterretentiononshalegasproduction
AT yulingtan twophaseflowmodelfornumericalinvestigationofimpactofwaterretentiononshalegasproduction
AT guangleicui twophaseflowmodelfornumericalinvestigationofimpactofwaterretentiononshalegasproduction