Different orthology inference algorithms generate similar predicted orthogroups among Brassicaceae species

Abstract Premise Orthology inference is crucial for comparative genomics, and multiple algorithms have been developed to identify putative orthologs for downstream analyses. Despite the abundance of proposed solutions, including publicly available benchmarks, it is difficult to assess which tool is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irene T. Liao, Karen E. Sears, Lena C. Hileman, Lachezar A. Nikolov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Applications in Plant Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11627
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832542934846668800
author Irene T. Liao
Karen E. Sears
Lena C. Hileman
Lachezar A. Nikolov
author_facet Irene T. Liao
Karen E. Sears
Lena C. Hileman
Lachezar A. Nikolov
author_sort Irene T. Liao
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Premise Orthology inference is crucial for comparative genomics, and multiple algorithms have been developed to identify putative orthologs for downstream analyses. Despite the abundance of proposed solutions, including publicly available benchmarks, it is difficult to assess which tool is most suitable for plant species, which commonly have complex genomic histories. Methods We explored the performance of four orthology inference algorithms—OrthoFinder, SonicParanoid, Broccoli, and OrthNet—on eight Brassicaceae genomes in two groups: one group comprising only diploids and another set comprising the diploids, two mesopolyploids, and one recent hexaploid genome. Results The composition of the orthogroups reflected the species' ploidy and genomic histories, with the diploid set having a higher proportion of identical orthogroups. While the diploid + higher ploidy set had a lower proportion of orthogroups with identical compositions, the average degree of similarity between the orthogroups was not different from the diploid set. Discussion Three algorithms—OrthoFinder, SonicParanoid, and Broccoli—are helpful for initial orthology predictions. Results produced using OrthNet were generally outliers but could still provide detailed information about gene colinearity. With our Brassicaceae dataset, slight discrepancies were found across the orthology inference algorithms, necessitating additional analyses such as tree inference to fine‐tune results.
format Article
id doaj-art-f90e5301c7ec484691b310f6be2fbf53
institution Kabale University
issn 2168-0450
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Applications in Plant Sciences
spelling doaj-art-f90e5301c7ec484691b310f6be2fbf532025-02-03T12:21:34ZengWileyApplications in Plant Sciences2168-04502025-01-01131n/an/a10.1002/aps3.11627Different orthology inference algorithms generate similar predicted orthogroups among Brassicaceae speciesIrene T. Liao0Karen E. Sears1Lena C. Hileman2Lachezar A. Nikolov3Department of Molecular, Cell, and Development Biology University of California – Los Angeles Los Angeles California USADepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Development Biology University of California – Los Angeles Los Angeles California USADepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas USADepartment of Biology Indiana University Bloomington 47405 Indiana USAAbstract Premise Orthology inference is crucial for comparative genomics, and multiple algorithms have been developed to identify putative orthologs for downstream analyses. Despite the abundance of proposed solutions, including publicly available benchmarks, it is difficult to assess which tool is most suitable for plant species, which commonly have complex genomic histories. Methods We explored the performance of four orthology inference algorithms—OrthoFinder, SonicParanoid, Broccoli, and OrthNet—on eight Brassicaceae genomes in two groups: one group comprising only diploids and another set comprising the diploids, two mesopolyploids, and one recent hexaploid genome. Results The composition of the orthogroups reflected the species' ploidy and genomic histories, with the diploid set having a higher proportion of identical orthogroups. While the diploid + higher ploidy set had a lower proportion of orthogroups with identical compositions, the average degree of similarity between the orthogroups was not different from the diploid set. Discussion Three algorithms—OrthoFinder, SonicParanoid, and Broccoli—are helpful for initial orthology predictions. Results produced using OrthNet were generally outliers but could still provide detailed information about gene colinearity. With our Brassicaceae dataset, slight discrepancies were found across the orthology inference algorithms, necessitating additional analyses such as tree inference to fine‐tune results.https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11627Brassicaceaecomparative genomicsorthogrouporthology inferencephylogenomicsYABBY gene family
spellingShingle Irene T. Liao
Karen E. Sears
Lena C. Hileman
Lachezar A. Nikolov
Different orthology inference algorithms generate similar predicted orthogroups among Brassicaceae species
Applications in Plant Sciences
Brassicaceae
comparative genomics
orthogroup
orthology inference
phylogenomics
YABBY gene family
title Different orthology inference algorithms generate similar predicted orthogroups among Brassicaceae species
title_full Different orthology inference algorithms generate similar predicted orthogroups among Brassicaceae species
title_fullStr Different orthology inference algorithms generate similar predicted orthogroups among Brassicaceae species
title_full_unstemmed Different orthology inference algorithms generate similar predicted orthogroups among Brassicaceae species
title_short Different orthology inference algorithms generate similar predicted orthogroups among Brassicaceae species
title_sort different orthology inference algorithms generate similar predicted orthogroups among brassicaceae species
topic Brassicaceae
comparative genomics
orthogroup
orthology inference
phylogenomics
YABBY gene family
url https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11627
work_keys_str_mv AT irenetliao differentorthologyinferencealgorithmsgeneratesimilarpredictedorthogroupsamongbrassicaceaespecies
AT karenesears differentorthologyinferencealgorithmsgeneratesimilarpredictedorthogroupsamongbrassicaceaespecies
AT lenachileman differentorthologyinferencealgorithmsgeneratesimilarpredictedorthogroupsamongbrassicaceaespecies
AT lachezaranikolov differentorthologyinferencealgorithmsgeneratesimilarpredictedorthogroupsamongbrassicaceaespecies