The effects of specimens geometry on solidification conditions and microstructure formation in laser powder bed fusion fabricated Ti–6Al–4V alloys

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) excels at creating intricately shaped parts, which will result in variations in solidification conditions, microstructure formation and mechanical properties. To address this issue, three distinct shapes: cubic, pyramidal and inversed pyramidal Ti–6Al–4V alloy specimen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rijie Zhao, Ronghui Kou, Haoliang Wang, Chenghao Song, Chuan Li, Zhenzhong Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-11-01
Series:Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785424023652
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) excels at creating intricately shaped parts, which will result in variations in solidification conditions, microstructure formation and mechanical properties. To address this issue, three distinct shapes: cubic, pyramidal and inversed pyramidal Ti–6Al–4V alloy specimens were fabricated using LPBF technology. The effects of specimen geometry on microstructure formation, transformation as well as its effects on mechanical properties were investigated in the present study. Our results show that specimen geometry significantly affects the thermal gradient, influencing nucleation and growth during fabrication. EBSD (Electron Backscatter Diffraction) characterization reveals that the primary β-phase grows in columnar grains in cubic specimens, coarse columnar grains along lateral faces in pyramidal specimens, and nearly equiaxed grains in inverted pyramidal specimens, leading to a significant reduction in texture. Nanoindentation tests show higher nanohardness in the top parts of cubic and pyramidal specimens compared to the bottom parts, while inverted pyramidal specimens have consistent nanohardness throughout. This variation is due to differences in solid solute concentration, melt pool undercooling, and thermal histories during and post solidification processes respectively. TEM results indicate that the fine lath phase on the top parts has transformed into β-phase, while the bottom parts remain as α′ phase, highlighting a disparity due to different thermal cycling times and temperatures.
ISSN:2238-7854