A Long-Term Follow-Up Programme for Maintenance of Motor Function after Stroke: Protocol of the life after Stroke—The LAST Study

Background. There are no evidence-based strategies that have been shown to be superior in maintaining motor function for months to years after the stroke. The LAST study therefore intends to assess the effect of a long-term follow-up program for stroke patients compared to standard care on function,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Torunn Askim, Birgitta Langhammer, Hege Ihle-Hansen, Jon Magnussen, Torgeir Engstad, Bent Indredavik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Stroke Research and Treatment
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/392101
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560845893140480
author Torunn Askim
Birgitta Langhammer
Hege Ihle-Hansen
Jon Magnussen
Torgeir Engstad
Bent Indredavik
author_facet Torunn Askim
Birgitta Langhammer
Hege Ihle-Hansen
Jon Magnussen
Torgeir Engstad
Bent Indredavik
author_sort Torunn Askim
collection DOAJ
description Background. There are no evidence-based strategies that have been shown to be superior in maintaining motor function for months to years after the stroke. The LAST study therefore intends to assess the effect of a long-term follow-up program for stroke patients compared to standard care on function, disability and health. Design. This is a prospective, multi-site randomised controlled trial, with blinded assessment 18 months after inclusion. A total of 390 patients will be recruited and randomised to a control group, receiving usual care, or to an intervention group 10 to 16 weeks after onset of stroke. Patients will be stratified according to stroke severity, age above 80, and recruitment site. The intervention group will receive monthly coaching on physical activity by a physiotherapist for 18 consecutive months after inclusion. Outcomes. The primary outcome is motor function (Motor Assessment Scale) 18 months after inclusion. Secondary outcomes are: dependency, balance, endurance, health-related quality of life, fatigue, anxiety and depression, cognitive function, burden on caregivers, and health costs. Adverse events and compliance to the intervention will be registered consecutively during follow-up.
format Article
id doaj-art-f7c33a2dce81433194b5bbd283a2d453
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8105
2042-0056
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Stroke Research and Treatment
spelling doaj-art-f7c33a2dce81433194b5bbd283a2d4532025-02-03T01:26:42ZengWileyStroke Research and Treatment2090-81052042-00562012-01-01201210.1155/2012/392101392101A Long-Term Follow-Up Programme for Maintenance of Motor Function after Stroke: Protocol of the life after Stroke—The LAST StudyTorunn Askim0Birgitta Langhammer1Hege Ihle-Hansen2Jon Magnussen3Torgeir Engstad4Bent Indredavik5Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken Trust, 1309 Rud, NorwayDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Geriatrics, University Hospital in Northern Norway, 9038 Tromsø, NorwayDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayBackground. There are no evidence-based strategies that have been shown to be superior in maintaining motor function for months to years after the stroke. The LAST study therefore intends to assess the effect of a long-term follow-up program for stroke patients compared to standard care on function, disability and health. Design. This is a prospective, multi-site randomised controlled trial, with blinded assessment 18 months after inclusion. A total of 390 patients will be recruited and randomised to a control group, receiving usual care, or to an intervention group 10 to 16 weeks after onset of stroke. Patients will be stratified according to stroke severity, age above 80, and recruitment site. The intervention group will receive monthly coaching on physical activity by a physiotherapist for 18 consecutive months after inclusion. Outcomes. The primary outcome is motor function (Motor Assessment Scale) 18 months after inclusion. Secondary outcomes are: dependency, balance, endurance, health-related quality of life, fatigue, anxiety and depression, cognitive function, burden on caregivers, and health costs. Adverse events and compliance to the intervention will be registered consecutively during follow-up.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/392101
spellingShingle Torunn Askim
Birgitta Langhammer
Hege Ihle-Hansen
Jon Magnussen
Torgeir Engstad
Bent Indredavik
A Long-Term Follow-Up Programme for Maintenance of Motor Function after Stroke: Protocol of the life after Stroke—The LAST Study
Stroke Research and Treatment
title A Long-Term Follow-Up Programme for Maintenance of Motor Function after Stroke: Protocol of the life after Stroke—The LAST Study
title_full A Long-Term Follow-Up Programme for Maintenance of Motor Function after Stroke: Protocol of the life after Stroke—The LAST Study
title_fullStr A Long-Term Follow-Up Programme for Maintenance of Motor Function after Stroke: Protocol of the life after Stroke—The LAST Study
title_full_unstemmed A Long-Term Follow-Up Programme for Maintenance of Motor Function after Stroke: Protocol of the life after Stroke—The LAST Study
title_short A Long-Term Follow-Up Programme for Maintenance of Motor Function after Stroke: Protocol of the life after Stroke—The LAST Study
title_sort long term follow up programme for maintenance of motor function after stroke protocol of the life after stroke the last study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/392101
work_keys_str_mv AT torunnaskim alongtermfollowupprogrammeformaintenanceofmotorfunctionafterstrokeprotocolofthelifeafterstrokethelaststudy
AT birgittalanghammer alongtermfollowupprogrammeformaintenanceofmotorfunctionafterstrokeprotocolofthelifeafterstrokethelaststudy
AT hegeihlehansen alongtermfollowupprogrammeformaintenanceofmotorfunctionafterstrokeprotocolofthelifeafterstrokethelaststudy
AT jonmagnussen alongtermfollowupprogrammeformaintenanceofmotorfunctionafterstrokeprotocolofthelifeafterstrokethelaststudy
AT torgeirengstad alongtermfollowupprogrammeformaintenanceofmotorfunctionafterstrokeprotocolofthelifeafterstrokethelaststudy
AT bentindredavik alongtermfollowupprogrammeformaintenanceofmotorfunctionafterstrokeprotocolofthelifeafterstrokethelaststudy
AT torunnaskim longtermfollowupprogrammeformaintenanceofmotorfunctionafterstrokeprotocolofthelifeafterstrokethelaststudy
AT birgittalanghammer longtermfollowupprogrammeformaintenanceofmotorfunctionafterstrokeprotocolofthelifeafterstrokethelaststudy
AT hegeihlehansen longtermfollowupprogrammeformaintenanceofmotorfunctionafterstrokeprotocolofthelifeafterstrokethelaststudy
AT jonmagnussen longtermfollowupprogrammeformaintenanceofmotorfunctionafterstrokeprotocolofthelifeafterstrokethelaststudy
AT torgeirengstad longtermfollowupprogrammeformaintenanceofmotorfunctionafterstrokeprotocolofthelifeafterstrokethelaststudy
AT bentindredavik longtermfollowupprogrammeformaintenanceofmotorfunctionafterstrokeprotocolofthelifeafterstrokethelaststudy