The McGill Pain Questionnaire, Japanese Version, Reconsidered: Confirming the Theoretical Structure
BACKGROUND: Based on a tripartite theoretical model of pain, the Pain Rating Index (PRI) of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) continues to be one of the most frequently used instruments to measure clinical pain. However, language and cultural barriers have hindered its wide use and standardization...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Mamoru Hasegawa, Suguru Hattori, Masaru Mishima, Isao Matsumoto, Takashi Kimura, Yasuko Baba, Osami Takano, Toshio Sasaki, Kazue Kanemura, Katsuhiko Senami, Toshinari Shibata |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2001-01-01
|
Series: | Pain Research and Management |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2001/718236 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The McGill Pain Questionnaire - Japanese Version, Reconsidered: Confirming the Reliability and Validity
by: Mamoru Hasegawa, et al.
Published: (1996-01-01) -
Validity and Reliability of Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in Iranian People with Parkinson’s Disease
by: Maryam Mehdizadeh, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
The McGill University Health Centre Cancer Pain Clinic: A Retrospective Analysis of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Cancer Pain Management
by: Jordi Perez, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Ian Milligan.History in the age of abundance? How the web is transforming historical research. Londres-Chicago: McGill-Queen’s University Press/Montreal & Kingston, 2019, 310 páginas
by: Emiliano Andrés Calomarde
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Owen and Sassoon Reconsidered
by: Cristina Pividori
Published: (2025-01-01)