APA (7th ed.) Citation

Walega, P., Romaniszyn, M., Siarkiewicz, B., & Zelazny, D. Dynamic versus Adynamic Graciloplasty in Treatment of End-Stage Fecal Incontinence: Is the Implantation of the Pacemaker Really Necessary? 12-Month Follow-Up in a Clinical, Physiological, and Functional Study. Wiley.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Walega, Piotr, Michal Romaniszyn, Benita Siarkiewicz, and Dorota Zelazny. Dynamic Versus Adynamic Graciloplasty in Treatment of End-Stage Fecal Incontinence: Is the Implantation of the Pacemaker Really Necessary? 12-Month Follow-Up in a Clinical, Physiological, and Functional Study. Wiley.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Walega, Piotr, et al. Dynamic Versus Adynamic Graciloplasty in Treatment of End-Stage Fecal Incontinence: Is the Implantation of the Pacemaker Really Necessary? 12-Month Follow-Up in a Clinical, Physiological, and Functional Study. Wiley.