Interpretation of Recent Unrest Events (Bradyseism) at Campi Flegrei, Napoli (Italy): Comparison of Models Based on Cyclical Hydrothermal Events versus Shallow Magmatic Intrusive Events

Several recent models that have been put forth to explain bradyseism at Campi Flegrei (CF), Italy, are discussed. Data obtained during long-term monitoring of the CF volcanic district has led to the development of a model based on lithological-structural and stratigraphic features that produce aniso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Lima, R. J. Bodnar, B. De Vivo, F. J. Spera, H. E. Belkin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Geofluids
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2000255
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560639487246336
author A. Lima
R. J. Bodnar
B. De Vivo
F. J. Spera
H. E. Belkin
author_facet A. Lima
R. J. Bodnar
B. De Vivo
F. J. Spera
H. E. Belkin
author_sort A. Lima
collection DOAJ
description Several recent models that have been put forth to explain bradyseism at Campi Flegrei (CF), Italy, are discussed. Data obtained during long-term monitoring of the CF volcanic district has led to the development of a model based on lithological-structural and stratigraphic features that produce anisotropic and heterogeneous permeability features showing large variations both horizontally and vertically; these data are inconsistent with a model in which bradyseism is driven exclusively by shallow magmatic intrusions. CF bradyseism events are driven by cyclical magmatic-hydrothermal activity. Bradyseism events are characterized by cyclical, constant invariant signals repeating over time, such as area deformation along with a spatially well-defined seismogenic volume. These similarities have been defined as “bradyseism signatures” that allow us to relate the bradyseism with impending eruption precursors. Bradyseism is governed by an impermeable shallow layer (B-layer), which is the cap of an anticlinal geological structure culminating at Pozzuoli, where maximum uplift is recorded. This B-layer acts as a throttling valve between the upper aquifer and the deeper hydrothermal system that experiences short (1-102 yr) timescale fluctuations between lithostatic/hydrostatic pressure. The hydrothermal system also communicates episodically with a cooling and quasi-steady-state long timescale (103-104 yr) magmatic system enclosed by an impermeable carapace (A layer). Connectivity between hydrostatic and lithostatic reservoirs is episodically turned on and off causing alternatively subsidence (when the systems are connected) or uplift (when the systems are disconnected), depending on whether permeability by fractures is established or not. Earthquake swarms are the manifestation of hydrofracturing which allows fluid expansion; this same process promotes silica precipitation that seals cracks and serves to isolate the two reservoirs. Faults and fractures promote outgassing and reduce the vertical uplift rate depending on fluid pressure gradients and spatial and temporal variations in the permeability field. The miniuplift episodes also show “bradyseism signatures” and are well explained in the context of the short timescale process.
format Article
id doaj-art-f71bd2bb21224a9fb0cd496d8e613e3d
institution Kabale University
issn 1468-8115
1468-8123
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geofluids
spelling doaj-art-f71bd2bb21224a9fb0cd496d8e613e3d2025-02-03T01:27:07ZengWileyGeofluids1468-81151468-81232021-01-01202110.1155/2021/20002552000255Interpretation of Recent Unrest Events (Bradyseism) at Campi Flegrei, Napoli (Italy): Comparison of Models Based on Cyclical Hydrothermal Events versus Shallow Magmatic Intrusive EventsA. Lima0R. J. Bodnar1B. De Vivo2F. J. Spera3H. E. Belkin4Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, dell’Ambiente e delle Risorse (DiSTAR), Università di Napoli Federico II, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant’Angelo, Via Cintia 26, 80126 Napoli, ItalyDepartment of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USAPegaso Online University, Piazza Trieste e Trento, 48, 80132 Napoli, ItalyDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USAU. S. Geological Survey Retired, Reston, Virginia 20190, USASeveral recent models that have been put forth to explain bradyseism at Campi Flegrei (CF), Italy, are discussed. Data obtained during long-term monitoring of the CF volcanic district has led to the development of a model based on lithological-structural and stratigraphic features that produce anisotropic and heterogeneous permeability features showing large variations both horizontally and vertically; these data are inconsistent with a model in which bradyseism is driven exclusively by shallow magmatic intrusions. CF bradyseism events are driven by cyclical magmatic-hydrothermal activity. Bradyseism events are characterized by cyclical, constant invariant signals repeating over time, such as area deformation along with a spatially well-defined seismogenic volume. These similarities have been defined as “bradyseism signatures” that allow us to relate the bradyseism with impending eruption precursors. Bradyseism is governed by an impermeable shallow layer (B-layer), which is the cap of an anticlinal geological structure culminating at Pozzuoli, where maximum uplift is recorded. This B-layer acts as a throttling valve between the upper aquifer and the deeper hydrothermal system that experiences short (1-102 yr) timescale fluctuations between lithostatic/hydrostatic pressure. The hydrothermal system also communicates episodically with a cooling and quasi-steady-state long timescale (103-104 yr) magmatic system enclosed by an impermeable carapace (A layer). Connectivity between hydrostatic and lithostatic reservoirs is episodically turned on and off causing alternatively subsidence (when the systems are connected) or uplift (when the systems are disconnected), depending on whether permeability by fractures is established or not. Earthquake swarms are the manifestation of hydrofracturing which allows fluid expansion; this same process promotes silica precipitation that seals cracks and serves to isolate the two reservoirs. Faults and fractures promote outgassing and reduce the vertical uplift rate depending on fluid pressure gradients and spatial and temporal variations in the permeability field. The miniuplift episodes also show “bradyseism signatures” and are well explained in the context of the short timescale process.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2000255
spellingShingle A. Lima
R. J. Bodnar
B. De Vivo
F. J. Spera
H. E. Belkin
Interpretation of Recent Unrest Events (Bradyseism) at Campi Flegrei, Napoli (Italy): Comparison of Models Based on Cyclical Hydrothermal Events versus Shallow Magmatic Intrusive Events
Geofluids
title Interpretation of Recent Unrest Events (Bradyseism) at Campi Flegrei, Napoli (Italy): Comparison of Models Based on Cyclical Hydrothermal Events versus Shallow Magmatic Intrusive Events
title_full Interpretation of Recent Unrest Events (Bradyseism) at Campi Flegrei, Napoli (Italy): Comparison of Models Based on Cyclical Hydrothermal Events versus Shallow Magmatic Intrusive Events
title_fullStr Interpretation of Recent Unrest Events (Bradyseism) at Campi Flegrei, Napoli (Italy): Comparison of Models Based on Cyclical Hydrothermal Events versus Shallow Magmatic Intrusive Events
title_full_unstemmed Interpretation of Recent Unrest Events (Bradyseism) at Campi Flegrei, Napoli (Italy): Comparison of Models Based on Cyclical Hydrothermal Events versus Shallow Magmatic Intrusive Events
title_short Interpretation of Recent Unrest Events (Bradyseism) at Campi Flegrei, Napoli (Italy): Comparison of Models Based on Cyclical Hydrothermal Events versus Shallow Magmatic Intrusive Events
title_sort interpretation of recent unrest events bradyseism at campi flegrei napoli italy comparison of models based on cyclical hydrothermal events versus shallow magmatic intrusive events
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2000255
work_keys_str_mv AT alima interpretationofrecentunresteventsbradyseismatcampiflegreinapoliitalycomparisonofmodelsbasedoncyclicalhydrothermaleventsversusshallowmagmaticintrusiveevents
AT rjbodnar interpretationofrecentunresteventsbradyseismatcampiflegreinapoliitalycomparisonofmodelsbasedoncyclicalhydrothermaleventsversusshallowmagmaticintrusiveevents
AT bdevivo interpretationofrecentunresteventsbradyseismatcampiflegreinapoliitalycomparisonofmodelsbasedoncyclicalhydrothermaleventsversusshallowmagmaticintrusiveevents
AT fjspera interpretationofrecentunresteventsbradyseismatcampiflegreinapoliitalycomparisonofmodelsbasedoncyclicalhydrothermaleventsversusshallowmagmaticintrusiveevents
AT hebelkin interpretationofrecentunresteventsbradyseismatcampiflegreinapoliitalycomparisonofmodelsbasedoncyclicalhydrothermaleventsversusshallowmagmaticintrusiveevents