Challenging the Myth of Presentation in Digital Editions
Are the data of an edition means to a particular and privileged presentation, or is the presentation a side effect? Because of the changing nature of computer systems, with constant progression in hardware and software, the encoded texts are the most important long-term outcome of the project—the re...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Text Encoding Initiative Consortium
2016-09-01
|
| Series: | Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/jtei/1453 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832578516920565760 |
|---|---|
| author | Magdalena Turska James Cummings Sebastian Rahtz |
| author_facet | Magdalena Turska James Cummings Sebastian Rahtz |
| author_sort | Magdalena Turska |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Are the data of an edition means to a particular and privileged presentation, or is the presentation a side effect? Because of the changing nature of computer systems, with constant progression in hardware and software, the encoded texts are the most important long-term outcome of the project—the representation of the knowledge— and presentation within a particular application is destined to become obsolete relatively quickly. However, it is most often the presentation output, rather than the source data, which is published and shared. We believe this is largely because there is currently no way of expressing, in the source encoding, aspects of presentation which are seen by editors as a crucial part of their work. Given a framework for encoding processing expectations for a variety of output formats, editors would be much more inclined to share the encoded files as their prime output, and intentions for presentation would be much more likely to survive repeated technology transitions as processing tools develop and change. We believe the collision between the individuality of research and the quest for common tools that aid in the creation of digital editions will be solved not by creating another piece of specialized publishing software but rather by creating a general framework for processing TEI documents and similar, modular solutions for other tasks in the publishing workflow. Such an abstraction layer admittedly still requires some fluency in computer technologies, but far less than for setting up a publication system from scratch in a general-purpose programming language. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f64754139b644c30a45eb823a91140a1 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2162-5603 |
| language | deu |
| publishDate | 2016-09-01 |
| publisher | Text Encoding Initiative Consortium |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative |
| spelling | doaj-art-f64754139b644c30a45eb823a91140a12025-01-30T13:56:26ZdeuText Encoding Initiative ConsortiumJournal of the Text Encoding Initiative2162-56032016-09-01910.4000/jtei.1453Challenging the Myth of Presentation in Digital EditionsMagdalena TurskaJames CummingsSebastian RahtzAre the data of an edition means to a particular and privileged presentation, or is the presentation a side effect? Because of the changing nature of computer systems, with constant progression in hardware and software, the encoded texts are the most important long-term outcome of the project—the representation of the knowledge— and presentation within a particular application is destined to become obsolete relatively quickly. However, it is most often the presentation output, rather than the source data, which is published and shared. We believe this is largely because there is currently no way of expressing, in the source encoding, aspects of presentation which are seen by editors as a crucial part of their work. Given a framework for encoding processing expectations for a variety of output formats, editors would be much more inclined to share the encoded files as their prime output, and intentions for presentation would be much more likely to survive repeated technology transitions as processing tools develop and change. We believe the collision between the individuality of research and the quest for common tools that aid in the creation of digital editions will be solved not by creating another piece of specialized publishing software but rather by creating a general framework for processing TEI documents and similar, modular solutions for other tasks in the publishing workflow. Such an abstraction layer admittedly still requires some fluency in computer technologies, but far less than for setting up a publication system from scratch in a general-purpose programming language.https://journals.openedition.org/jtei/1453TEIdigital editionpublication frameworkprocessingTEI Simple |
| spellingShingle | Magdalena Turska James Cummings Sebastian Rahtz Challenging the Myth of Presentation in Digital Editions Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative TEI digital edition publication framework processing TEI Simple |
| title | Challenging the Myth of Presentation in Digital Editions |
| title_full | Challenging the Myth of Presentation in Digital Editions |
| title_fullStr | Challenging the Myth of Presentation in Digital Editions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Challenging the Myth of Presentation in Digital Editions |
| title_short | Challenging the Myth of Presentation in Digital Editions |
| title_sort | challenging the myth of presentation in digital editions |
| topic | TEI digital edition publication framework processing TEI Simple |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/jtei/1453 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT magdalenaturska challengingthemythofpresentationindigitaleditions AT jamescummings challengingthemythofpresentationindigitaleditions AT sebastianrahtz challengingthemythofpresentationindigitaleditions |