Agriculture urbaine et habitat humain

In Chapter 9, « The Urban Challenge », the Brundtland Report recommended developing urban agriculture. The research that ensued has focused on its contribution to food production, the struggle against poverty, improving the quality of soil, air and water. But it still seems to be a marginal activity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louiza Boukharaeva, Marcel Marloie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Laboratoire Éco-anthropologie et Ethnobiologie 2015-12-01
Series:Revue d'ethnoécologie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/2283
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832095924586807296
author Louiza Boukharaeva
Marcel Marloie
author_facet Louiza Boukharaeva
Marcel Marloie
author_sort Louiza Boukharaeva
collection DOAJ
description In Chapter 9, « The Urban Challenge », the Brundtland Report recommended developing urban agriculture. The research that ensued has focused on its contribution to food production, the struggle against poverty, improving the quality of soil, air and water. But it still seems to be a marginal activity for a small fraction of the urban population with medium or low income. Experiences in Russia and other European countries show a phenomenon of greater magnitude which can interest most city dwellers. Indeed, it offers the possibility of supplementing an urban home with a plot in which one can combine food production and recreation (rest, health improvement, freedom of activity, strengthening of family ties), according to their needs, their desires, and their constraints. With a surface varying between 300 and 1000 m², the individual plots of land in the allotment gardens, allotment vegetable gardens and dacha allotments concern about a quarter of the urban population of Russia, and less in other countries. The right to build a small house in which to stay for weekends and holidays expands their multifunctionality. This extra-professional and non-market activity was a social conquest within the Soviet regime. It provides an alternative to the suburban model which pollutes and destroys soils. By helping people overcome stress and contributing significantly to avoid the risks of famine, it was a shock absorber of the systemic crisis of the 1990s. Contrary to the prevailing view since 1929 that individual gardening carries a « petty bourgeois » spirit, it actually allows to invent lifestyles more compatible with the existential needs of individuals. This family urban agriculture is a way to build a more autonomous, more social and more ecological urban society. It is a necessity for the resilience of individuals, families and society.
format Article
id doaj-art-f5d773b252bb4252860c4242b87e9a6a
institution Kabale University
issn 2267-2419
language English
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher Laboratoire Éco-anthropologie et Ethnobiologie
record_format Article
series Revue d'ethnoécologie
spelling doaj-art-f5d773b252bb4252860c4242b87e9a6a2025-02-05T16:24:58ZengLaboratoire Éco-anthropologie et EthnobiologieRevue d'ethnoécologie2267-24192015-12-01810.4000/ethnoecologie.2283Agriculture urbaine et habitat humainLouiza BoukharaevaMarcel MarloieIn Chapter 9, « The Urban Challenge », the Brundtland Report recommended developing urban agriculture. The research that ensued has focused on its contribution to food production, the struggle against poverty, improving the quality of soil, air and water. But it still seems to be a marginal activity for a small fraction of the urban population with medium or low income. Experiences in Russia and other European countries show a phenomenon of greater magnitude which can interest most city dwellers. Indeed, it offers the possibility of supplementing an urban home with a plot in which one can combine food production and recreation (rest, health improvement, freedom of activity, strengthening of family ties), according to their needs, their desires, and their constraints. With a surface varying between 300 and 1000 m², the individual plots of land in the allotment gardens, allotment vegetable gardens and dacha allotments concern about a quarter of the urban population of Russia, and less in other countries. The right to build a small house in which to stay for weekends and holidays expands their multifunctionality. This extra-professional and non-market activity was a social conquest within the Soviet regime. It provides an alternative to the suburban model which pollutes and destroys soils. By helping people overcome stress and contributing significantly to avoid the risks of famine, it was a shock absorber of the systemic crisis of the 1990s. Contrary to the prevailing view since 1929 that individual gardening carries a « petty bourgeois » spirit, it actually allows to invent lifestyles more compatible with the existential needs of individuals. This family urban agriculture is a way to build a more autonomous, more social and more ecological urban society. It is a necessity for the resilience of individuals, families and society.https://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/2283urban gardeninghuman sustainable developmentnon-commercial economypovertyresilience
spellingShingle Louiza Boukharaeva
Marcel Marloie
Agriculture urbaine et habitat humain
Revue d'ethnoécologie
urban gardening
human sustainable development
non-commercial economy
poverty
resilience
title Agriculture urbaine et habitat humain
title_full Agriculture urbaine et habitat humain
title_fullStr Agriculture urbaine et habitat humain
title_full_unstemmed Agriculture urbaine et habitat humain
title_short Agriculture urbaine et habitat humain
title_sort agriculture urbaine et habitat humain
topic urban gardening
human sustainable development
non-commercial economy
poverty
resilience
url https://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/2283
work_keys_str_mv AT louizaboukharaeva agricultureurbaineethabitathumain
AT marcelmarloie agricultureurbaineethabitathumain