Using Generative AI to Identify Arguments in Judges’ Reasons: Accuracy and Benefits for Students
This study evaluates the effectiveness of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in identifying and reconstructing legal arguments from judges’ reasons in court cases, focusing on the practical implications for law students and legal educators. By examining the performance of two versions of popul...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Paul Burgess, Iwan Williams, Lizhen Qu, Weiqing Wang |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Queensland University of Technology
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Law, Technology and Humans |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://lthj.qut.edu.au/article/view/3637 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Argument from Ignorance and Argument from Silence
by: E. N. Lisanyuk, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
On the Virtue-theoretic Approach to Argument Appraisal
by: Matthew William McKeon
Published: (2025-01-01) -
AI Reasoning in Deep Learning Era: From Symbolic AI to Neural–Symbolic AI
by: Baoyu Liang, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Progression of argumentative reasoning and the relation with visual attention in an interactive learning environment
by: Fang-Ying Yang, Yuan-Li Liu, Shih-Chieh Chien, Yi-Wen Hung
Published: (2025-04-01) -
Advancing Deliberative Discourse Measurement: The Intersection with Computational Abstract Argumentation in Discourse Quality Evaluations
by: Sanjay Kumar, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01)