Skin Testing to Identify Safe Drugs for Patients with Rocuronium-Induced Anaphylaxis

Among patients who develop anaphylaxis during anesthesia, anaphylaxis caused by a neuromuscular blocking agent has the highest incidence. In patients who developed IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, and cross-reactivity among NMBAs is a concern in subsequent anesthetic procedures. We present a patient who de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manzo Suzuki, Hajime Kawase, Azusa Ogita, Hiroyasu Bito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Anesthesiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8163620
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566242285715456
author Manzo Suzuki
Hajime Kawase
Azusa Ogita
Hiroyasu Bito
author_facet Manzo Suzuki
Hajime Kawase
Azusa Ogita
Hiroyasu Bito
author_sort Manzo Suzuki
collection DOAJ
description Among patients who develop anaphylaxis during anesthesia, anaphylaxis caused by a neuromuscular blocking agent has the highest incidence. In patients who developed IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, and cross-reactivity among NMBAs is a concern in subsequent anesthetic procedures. We present a patient who developed rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis in whom the skin prick test (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT) could identify a safe drug to use in the subsequent anesthetic procedure. A 32-year-old female developed anaphylactic shock at the induction of general anesthesia. She recovered by administration of hydrocortisone and epinephrine. Skin tests including the SPT followed by the IDT revealed rocuronium as the drug that caused anaphylaxis and vecuronium as a safe drug to use for the subsequent general anesthesia. She safely underwent surgery with general anesthesia using vecuronium one month after the skin testing. There are not many reports on the effectiveness of the SPT followed by IDT in identifying the causative drug as well as a safe drug to use in the subsequent anesthetic procedure following anaphylaxis during anesthesia. The usefulness of the SPT should be re-evaluated.
format Article
id doaj-art-f4af09d5134243a0ab15826b7de1d2c1
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6382
2090-6390
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Anesthesiology
spelling doaj-art-f4af09d5134243a0ab15826b7de1d2c12025-02-03T01:04:46ZengWileyCase Reports in Anesthesiology2090-63822090-63902020-01-01202010.1155/2020/81636208163620Skin Testing to Identify Safe Drugs for Patients with Rocuronium-Induced AnaphylaxisManzo Suzuki0Hajime Kawase1Azusa Ogita2Hiroyasu Bito3Anesthesiologist, Yatsu Health Hospital, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Musashikosugi Hospital Nippon Medical School, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Dermatology, Musashikosugi Hospital Nippon Medical School, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Musashikosugi Hospital Nippon Medical School, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, JapanAmong patients who develop anaphylaxis during anesthesia, anaphylaxis caused by a neuromuscular blocking agent has the highest incidence. In patients who developed IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, and cross-reactivity among NMBAs is a concern in subsequent anesthetic procedures. We present a patient who developed rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis in whom the skin prick test (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT) could identify a safe drug to use in the subsequent anesthetic procedure. A 32-year-old female developed anaphylactic shock at the induction of general anesthesia. She recovered by administration of hydrocortisone and epinephrine. Skin tests including the SPT followed by the IDT revealed rocuronium as the drug that caused anaphylaxis and vecuronium as a safe drug to use for the subsequent general anesthesia. She safely underwent surgery with general anesthesia using vecuronium one month after the skin testing. There are not many reports on the effectiveness of the SPT followed by IDT in identifying the causative drug as well as a safe drug to use in the subsequent anesthetic procedure following anaphylaxis during anesthesia. The usefulness of the SPT should be re-evaluated.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8163620
spellingShingle Manzo Suzuki
Hajime Kawase
Azusa Ogita
Hiroyasu Bito
Skin Testing to Identify Safe Drugs for Patients with Rocuronium-Induced Anaphylaxis
Case Reports in Anesthesiology
title Skin Testing to Identify Safe Drugs for Patients with Rocuronium-Induced Anaphylaxis
title_full Skin Testing to Identify Safe Drugs for Patients with Rocuronium-Induced Anaphylaxis
title_fullStr Skin Testing to Identify Safe Drugs for Patients with Rocuronium-Induced Anaphylaxis
title_full_unstemmed Skin Testing to Identify Safe Drugs for Patients with Rocuronium-Induced Anaphylaxis
title_short Skin Testing to Identify Safe Drugs for Patients with Rocuronium-Induced Anaphylaxis
title_sort skin testing to identify safe drugs for patients with rocuronium induced anaphylaxis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8163620
work_keys_str_mv AT manzosuzuki skintestingtoidentifysafedrugsforpatientswithrocuroniuminducedanaphylaxis
AT hajimekawase skintestingtoidentifysafedrugsforpatientswithrocuroniuminducedanaphylaxis
AT azusaogita skintestingtoidentifysafedrugsforpatientswithrocuroniuminducedanaphylaxis
AT hiroyasubito skintestingtoidentifysafedrugsforpatientswithrocuroniuminducedanaphylaxis