Man versus Machine: Software Training for Surgeons—An Objective Evaluation of Human and Computer-Based Training Tools for Cataract Surgical Performance
This study aimed to address two queries: firstly, the relationship between two cataract surgical feedback tools for training, one human and one software based, and, secondly, evaluating microscope control during phacoemulsification using the software. Videos of surgeons with varying experience were...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Ophthalmology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3548039 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832567140410982400 |
---|---|
author | Nizar Din Phillip Smith Krisztina Emeriewen Anant Sharma Simon Jones James Wawrzynski Hongying Tang Paul Sullivan Silvestro Caputo George M. Saleh |
author_facet | Nizar Din Phillip Smith Krisztina Emeriewen Anant Sharma Simon Jones James Wawrzynski Hongying Tang Paul Sullivan Silvestro Caputo George M. Saleh |
author_sort | Nizar Din |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This study aimed to address two queries: firstly, the relationship between two cataract surgical feedback tools for training, one human and one software based, and, secondly, evaluating microscope control during phacoemulsification using the software. Videos of surgeons with varying experience were enrolled and independently scored with the validated PhacoTrack motion capture software and the Objective Structured Assessment of Cataract Surgical Skill (OSACCS) human scoring tool. Microscope centration and path length travelled were also evaluated with the PhacoTrack software. Twenty-two videos correlated PhacoTrack motion capture with OSACCS. The PhacoTrack path length, number of movements, and total procedure time were found to have high levels of Spearman’s rank correlation of -0.6792619 (p=0.001), -0.6652021 (p=0.002), and -0.771529 (p=0001), respectively, with OSACCS. Sixty-two videos evaluated microscope camera control. Novice surgeons had their camera off the pupil centre at a far greater mean distance (SD) of 6.9 (3.3) mm, compared with experts of 3.6 (1.6) mm (p≪0.05). The expert surgeons maintained good microscope camera control and limited total pupil path length travelled 2512 (1031) mm compared with novices of 4049 (2709) mm (p≪0.05). Good agreement between human and machine quantified measurements of surgical skill exists. Our results demonstrate that surrogate markers for camera control are predictors of surgical skills. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-f3c4c366928c42f1ae36c797e4ea0fae |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2090-004X 2090-0058 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Ophthalmology |
spelling | doaj-art-f3c4c366928c42f1ae36c797e4ea0fae2025-02-03T01:02:19ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582016-01-01201610.1155/2016/35480393548039Man versus Machine: Software Training for Surgeons—An Objective Evaluation of Human and Computer-Based Training Tools for Cataract Surgical PerformanceNizar Din0Phillip Smith1Krisztina Emeriewen2Anant Sharma3Simon Jones4James Wawrzynski5Hongying Tang6Paul Sullivan7Silvestro Caputo8George M. Saleh9Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UKDepartment of Computer Science, University Of Surrey, Guildford, UKMoorfields Eye Hospital, Bedford, UKMoorfields Eye Hospital, Bedford, UKNYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USARoyal Free Hospital, London, UKDepartment of Computer Science, University Of Surrey, Guildford, UKMoorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UKMoorfields Eye Hospital, Bedford, UKMoorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UKThis study aimed to address two queries: firstly, the relationship between two cataract surgical feedback tools for training, one human and one software based, and, secondly, evaluating microscope control during phacoemulsification using the software. Videos of surgeons with varying experience were enrolled and independently scored with the validated PhacoTrack motion capture software and the Objective Structured Assessment of Cataract Surgical Skill (OSACCS) human scoring tool. Microscope centration and path length travelled were also evaluated with the PhacoTrack software. Twenty-two videos correlated PhacoTrack motion capture with OSACCS. The PhacoTrack path length, number of movements, and total procedure time were found to have high levels of Spearman’s rank correlation of -0.6792619 (p=0.001), -0.6652021 (p=0.002), and -0.771529 (p=0001), respectively, with OSACCS. Sixty-two videos evaluated microscope camera control. Novice surgeons had their camera off the pupil centre at a far greater mean distance (SD) of 6.9 (3.3) mm, compared with experts of 3.6 (1.6) mm (p≪0.05). The expert surgeons maintained good microscope camera control and limited total pupil path length travelled 2512 (1031) mm compared with novices of 4049 (2709) mm (p≪0.05). Good agreement between human and machine quantified measurements of surgical skill exists. Our results demonstrate that surrogate markers for camera control are predictors of surgical skills.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3548039 |
spellingShingle | Nizar Din Phillip Smith Krisztina Emeriewen Anant Sharma Simon Jones James Wawrzynski Hongying Tang Paul Sullivan Silvestro Caputo George M. Saleh Man versus Machine: Software Training for Surgeons—An Objective Evaluation of Human and Computer-Based Training Tools for Cataract Surgical Performance Journal of Ophthalmology |
title | Man versus Machine: Software Training for Surgeons—An Objective Evaluation of Human and Computer-Based Training Tools for Cataract Surgical Performance |
title_full | Man versus Machine: Software Training for Surgeons—An Objective Evaluation of Human and Computer-Based Training Tools for Cataract Surgical Performance |
title_fullStr | Man versus Machine: Software Training for Surgeons—An Objective Evaluation of Human and Computer-Based Training Tools for Cataract Surgical Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Man versus Machine: Software Training for Surgeons—An Objective Evaluation of Human and Computer-Based Training Tools for Cataract Surgical Performance |
title_short | Man versus Machine: Software Training for Surgeons—An Objective Evaluation of Human and Computer-Based Training Tools for Cataract Surgical Performance |
title_sort | man versus machine software training for surgeons an objective evaluation of human and computer based training tools for cataract surgical performance |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3548039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nizardin manversusmachinesoftwaretrainingforsurgeonsanobjectiveevaluationofhumanandcomputerbasedtrainingtoolsforcataractsurgicalperformance AT phillipsmith manversusmachinesoftwaretrainingforsurgeonsanobjectiveevaluationofhumanandcomputerbasedtrainingtoolsforcataractsurgicalperformance AT krisztinaemeriewen manversusmachinesoftwaretrainingforsurgeonsanobjectiveevaluationofhumanandcomputerbasedtrainingtoolsforcataractsurgicalperformance AT anantsharma manversusmachinesoftwaretrainingforsurgeonsanobjectiveevaluationofhumanandcomputerbasedtrainingtoolsforcataractsurgicalperformance AT simonjones manversusmachinesoftwaretrainingforsurgeonsanobjectiveevaluationofhumanandcomputerbasedtrainingtoolsforcataractsurgicalperformance AT jameswawrzynski manversusmachinesoftwaretrainingforsurgeonsanobjectiveevaluationofhumanandcomputerbasedtrainingtoolsforcataractsurgicalperformance AT hongyingtang manversusmachinesoftwaretrainingforsurgeonsanobjectiveevaluationofhumanandcomputerbasedtrainingtoolsforcataractsurgicalperformance AT paulsullivan manversusmachinesoftwaretrainingforsurgeonsanobjectiveevaluationofhumanandcomputerbasedtrainingtoolsforcataractsurgicalperformance AT silvestrocaputo manversusmachinesoftwaretrainingforsurgeonsanobjectiveevaluationofhumanandcomputerbasedtrainingtoolsforcataractsurgicalperformance AT georgemsaleh manversusmachinesoftwaretrainingforsurgeonsanobjectiveevaluationofhumanandcomputerbasedtrainingtoolsforcataractsurgicalperformance |