Impact of Sex on Infection Risk in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

<b>Background:</b> Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that exhibits considerable diversity in terms of both clinical and immunological manifestations. Since its female-to-male ratio is around 9:1, it is well recognized that systemic lupus erythematosus mos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Borrelli, S. Nicola, F. Corradi, I. Badiu, L. Lo Sardo, N. Rashidy, A. Quinternetto, M. Mazzola, F. Meli, E. Saracco, I. Vitali, S. Negrini, L. Brussino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Bioengineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/1/59
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589085986783232
author R. Borrelli
S. Nicola
F. Corradi
I. Badiu
L. Lo Sardo
N. Rashidy
A. Quinternetto
M. Mazzola
F. Meli
E. Saracco
I. Vitali
S. Negrini
L. Brussino
author_facet R. Borrelli
S. Nicola
F. Corradi
I. Badiu
L. Lo Sardo
N. Rashidy
A. Quinternetto
M. Mazzola
F. Meli
E. Saracco
I. Vitali
S. Negrini
L. Brussino
author_sort R. Borrelli
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background:</b> Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that exhibits considerable diversity in terms of both clinical and immunological manifestations. Since its female-to-male ratio is around 9:1, it is well recognized that systemic lupus erythematosus mostly affects women, especially those of childbearing age. There is a greater susceptibility to infections in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared to the general population. However, only a small number of studies have attempted to analyze this risk using real-life data, and even fewer have successfully assessed the influence of sex. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted, enrolling patients and dividing them into two groups based on their biological sex. Infectious episodes were identified from medical records and categorized by severity. Patients were stratified according to disease duration and treatment received. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the assessment of risk factors. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for potential confounders. Model fit was evaluated using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, and interactions between variables were tested. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. <b>Results:</b> A total of 119 patients (107 females and 12 males) were included in the analysis. No significant difference in age was found between sexes (t = −0.715, <i>p</i> = 0.487), but disease duration was significantly shorter in males (t = 3.35, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Logistic regression showed a significant association between male sex and infection risk (β = 0.9426, <i>p</i> = 0.05), with males having an almost sixfold higher probability of infection compared to females (OR 5.675, 95% CI: 1.4479–22.2477, <i>p</i> = 0.0127). Disease duration (β = 0.0250, <i>p</i> = 0.102) and smoking status (β = 0.4529, <i>p</i> = 0.078) were not statistically significant. Lastly, correlation analysis revealed a significant association between SS-A antibodies and infection rate (r = 0.291, <i>p</i> = 0.003). <b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights a significant sex-based disparity in the risk of infections among SLE patients, with males being at a higher risk compared to females. The differences in the distribution of infections, such as the higher prevalence of pneumonia in males and urinary tract infections in females, suggest that sex-specific factors, including immunological and hormonal differences, may influence infection susceptibility. Our findings emphasize the need for tailored clinical management, with increased vigilance for infections in male patients, to improve prevention strategies and targeted therapeutic interventions in this subgroup.
format Article
id doaj-art-f3070afaf3b246d4b09229e20125c848
institution Kabale University
issn 2306-5354
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Bioengineering
spelling doaj-art-f3070afaf3b246d4b09229e20125c8482025-01-24T13:23:07ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542025-01-011215910.3390/bioengineering12010059Impact of Sex on Infection Risk in Patients with Systemic Lupus ErythematosusR. Borrelli0S. Nicola1F. Corradi2I. Badiu3L. Lo Sardo4N. Rashidy5A. Quinternetto6M. Mazzola7F. Meli8E. Saracco9I. Vitali10S. Negrini11L. Brussino12Allergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, ItalyAllergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, ItalyAllergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, ItalyAllergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, ItalyAllergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, ItalyAllergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, ItalyAllergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, ItalyAllergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, ItalyAllergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, ItalyAllergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, ItalyAllergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, ItalyAllergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, ItalyAllergy and Immunology Unit, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, Italy<b>Background:</b> Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that exhibits considerable diversity in terms of both clinical and immunological manifestations. Since its female-to-male ratio is around 9:1, it is well recognized that systemic lupus erythematosus mostly affects women, especially those of childbearing age. There is a greater susceptibility to infections in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared to the general population. However, only a small number of studies have attempted to analyze this risk using real-life data, and even fewer have successfully assessed the influence of sex. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted, enrolling patients and dividing them into two groups based on their biological sex. Infectious episodes were identified from medical records and categorized by severity. Patients were stratified according to disease duration and treatment received. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the assessment of risk factors. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for potential confounders. Model fit was evaluated using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, and interactions between variables were tested. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. <b>Results:</b> A total of 119 patients (107 females and 12 males) were included in the analysis. No significant difference in age was found between sexes (t = −0.715, <i>p</i> = 0.487), but disease duration was significantly shorter in males (t = 3.35, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Logistic regression showed a significant association between male sex and infection risk (β = 0.9426, <i>p</i> = 0.05), with males having an almost sixfold higher probability of infection compared to females (OR 5.675, 95% CI: 1.4479–22.2477, <i>p</i> = 0.0127). Disease duration (β = 0.0250, <i>p</i> = 0.102) and smoking status (β = 0.4529, <i>p</i> = 0.078) were not statistically significant. Lastly, correlation analysis revealed a significant association between SS-A antibodies and infection rate (r = 0.291, <i>p</i> = 0.003). <b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights a significant sex-based disparity in the risk of infections among SLE patients, with males being at a higher risk compared to females. The differences in the distribution of infections, such as the higher prevalence of pneumonia in males and urinary tract infections in females, suggest that sex-specific factors, including immunological and hormonal differences, may influence infection susceptibility. Our findings emphasize the need for tailored clinical management, with increased vigilance for infections in male patients, to improve prevention strategies and targeted therapeutic interventions in this subgroup.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/1/59lupussystemic lupus erythematosusSLEinfectionssex
spellingShingle R. Borrelli
S. Nicola
F. Corradi
I. Badiu
L. Lo Sardo
N. Rashidy
A. Quinternetto
M. Mazzola
F. Meli
E. Saracco
I. Vitali
S. Negrini
L. Brussino
Impact of Sex on Infection Risk in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Bioengineering
lupus
systemic lupus erythematosus
SLE
infections
sex
title Impact of Sex on Infection Risk in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
title_full Impact of Sex on Infection Risk in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
title_fullStr Impact of Sex on Infection Risk in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Sex on Infection Risk in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
title_short Impact of Sex on Infection Risk in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
title_sort impact of sex on infection risk in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
topic lupus
systemic lupus erythematosus
SLE
infections
sex
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/1/59
work_keys_str_mv AT rborrelli impactofsexoninfectionriskinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT snicola impactofsexoninfectionriskinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT fcorradi impactofsexoninfectionriskinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT ibadiu impactofsexoninfectionriskinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT llosardo impactofsexoninfectionriskinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT nrashidy impactofsexoninfectionriskinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT aquinternetto impactofsexoninfectionriskinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT mmazzola impactofsexoninfectionriskinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT fmeli impactofsexoninfectionriskinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT esaracco impactofsexoninfectionriskinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT ivitali impactofsexoninfectionriskinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT snegrini impactofsexoninfectionriskinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosus
AT lbrussino impactofsexoninfectionriskinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosus