Lights and Siren Transport and the Need for Hospital Intervention in Nontrauma Patients: A Prospective Study

Background. The use of lights and siren transport (LST) has been a matter of debate because of the short time savings and well-established increased risks for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and bystanders. Time-critical hospital intervention (TCHI) denotes urgently needed procedures that cannot be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olivier Bertholet, Mathieu Pasquier, Elina Christes, Damien Wirths, Pierre-Nicolas Carron, Olivier Hugli, Fabrice Dami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Emergency Medicine International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2651624
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832546984661090304
author Olivier Bertholet
Mathieu Pasquier
Elina Christes
Damien Wirths
Pierre-Nicolas Carron
Olivier Hugli
Fabrice Dami
author_facet Olivier Bertholet
Mathieu Pasquier
Elina Christes
Damien Wirths
Pierre-Nicolas Carron
Olivier Hugli
Fabrice Dami
author_sort Olivier Bertholet
collection DOAJ
description Background. The use of lights and siren transport (LST) has been a matter of debate because of the short time savings and well-established increased risks for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and bystanders. Time-critical hospital intervention (TCHI) denotes urgently needed procedures that cannot be performed properly in an out-of-hospital setting. Since 2013, rapid transportation from the field, fast-track, is currently used for patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, suspicion of acute stroke and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of LST was associated with the realization of TCHI for nontrauma cases within 15 minutes of hospital arrival, to quantify overtriage (LST without TCHI) and to identify the predictors of TCHI. Methods. This is a monocentric prospective observational study of nontrauma patients transported by ambulance. Based on Ross et al.’s work in 2016 on trauma patients, TCHI procedures were developed by the study team. Descriptive statistics were used to determine whether the use of LST was associated with the realization of TCHI. Multivariable analyses determined the predictors of TCHI and compared clinical outcomes. Results. On the 324 patients included, 67 (20.7%) benefitted from LST, with 40 (59.7%) receiving TCHI (p<0.001). The overtriage rate was 40.3%. The most common medical TCHI was the fast-track (65.2% of all TCHI). LST was predictive of the need for TCHI (p<0.001), as was the clinical condition of the patient and also when EMS providers expected TCHI. Conclusions. A majority of the LST benefitted from TCHI with an overtriage rate of 40%. To reduce the rate of overtriage (LST without TCHI), LST should mainly be used for fast-track and when TCHI is expected by the EMS providers.
format Article
id doaj-art-f27d801c85024788b18ddf564ae29323
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-2840
2090-2859
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Emergency Medicine International
spelling doaj-art-f27d801c85024788b18ddf564ae293232025-02-03T06:46:36ZengWileyEmergency Medicine International2090-28402090-28592020-01-01202010.1155/2020/26516242651624Lights and Siren Transport and the Need for Hospital Intervention in Nontrauma Patients: A Prospective StudyOlivier Bertholet0Mathieu Pasquier1Elina Christes2Damien Wirths3Pierre-Nicolas Carron4Olivier Hugli5Fabrice Dami6Emergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, SwitzerlandEmergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, SwitzerlandFaculty of Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, SwitzerlandDeputy Head in Charge of Community Policy, Lausanne City, CH-1000 Lausanne, SwitzerlandEmergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, SwitzerlandEmergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, SwitzerlandEmergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, SwitzerlandBackground. The use of lights and siren transport (LST) has been a matter of debate because of the short time savings and well-established increased risks for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and bystanders. Time-critical hospital intervention (TCHI) denotes urgently needed procedures that cannot be performed properly in an out-of-hospital setting. Since 2013, rapid transportation from the field, fast-track, is currently used for patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, suspicion of acute stroke and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of LST was associated with the realization of TCHI for nontrauma cases within 15 minutes of hospital arrival, to quantify overtriage (LST without TCHI) and to identify the predictors of TCHI. Methods. This is a monocentric prospective observational study of nontrauma patients transported by ambulance. Based on Ross et al.’s work in 2016 on trauma patients, TCHI procedures were developed by the study team. Descriptive statistics were used to determine whether the use of LST was associated with the realization of TCHI. Multivariable analyses determined the predictors of TCHI and compared clinical outcomes. Results. On the 324 patients included, 67 (20.7%) benefitted from LST, with 40 (59.7%) receiving TCHI (p<0.001). The overtriage rate was 40.3%. The most common medical TCHI was the fast-track (65.2% of all TCHI). LST was predictive of the need for TCHI (p<0.001), as was the clinical condition of the patient and also when EMS providers expected TCHI. Conclusions. A majority of the LST benefitted from TCHI with an overtriage rate of 40%. To reduce the rate of overtriage (LST without TCHI), LST should mainly be used for fast-track and when TCHI is expected by the EMS providers.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2651624
spellingShingle Olivier Bertholet
Mathieu Pasquier
Elina Christes
Damien Wirths
Pierre-Nicolas Carron
Olivier Hugli
Fabrice Dami
Lights and Siren Transport and the Need for Hospital Intervention in Nontrauma Patients: A Prospective Study
Emergency Medicine International
title Lights and Siren Transport and the Need for Hospital Intervention in Nontrauma Patients: A Prospective Study
title_full Lights and Siren Transport and the Need for Hospital Intervention in Nontrauma Patients: A Prospective Study
title_fullStr Lights and Siren Transport and the Need for Hospital Intervention in Nontrauma Patients: A Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Lights and Siren Transport and the Need for Hospital Intervention in Nontrauma Patients: A Prospective Study
title_short Lights and Siren Transport and the Need for Hospital Intervention in Nontrauma Patients: A Prospective Study
title_sort lights and siren transport and the need for hospital intervention in nontrauma patients a prospective study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2651624
work_keys_str_mv AT olivierbertholet lightsandsirentransportandtheneedforhospitalinterventioninnontraumapatientsaprospectivestudy
AT mathieupasquier lightsandsirentransportandtheneedforhospitalinterventioninnontraumapatientsaprospectivestudy
AT elinachristes lightsandsirentransportandtheneedforhospitalinterventioninnontraumapatientsaprospectivestudy
AT damienwirths lightsandsirentransportandtheneedforhospitalinterventioninnontraumapatientsaprospectivestudy
AT pierrenicolascarron lightsandsirentransportandtheneedforhospitalinterventioninnontraumapatientsaprospectivestudy
AT olivierhugli lightsandsirentransportandtheneedforhospitalinterventioninnontraumapatientsaprospectivestudy
AT fabricedami lightsandsirentransportandtheneedforhospitalinterventioninnontraumapatientsaprospectivestudy