Lithological and geochemical characterization of ‘adinole’ artefacts from cave deposits in southwest Wales: A material of choice during the late Middle to Upper Palaeolithic

Twenty-three artefacts previously identified as being manufactured from adinole, a fine-grained metasomatic rock, from late Middle to Upper Palaeolithic cave sites in southwest Wales have been re-examined in terms of their petrology and geochemistry. Standard petrography has been combined with autom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard Bevins, Elizabeth A. Walker, Nick Pearce, Duncan Pirrie, Rob Ixer, Ian Saunders, Matthew Power
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:Quaternary Environments and Humans
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950236525000027
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832087441664638976
author Richard Bevins
Elizabeth A. Walker
Nick Pearce
Duncan Pirrie
Rob Ixer
Ian Saunders
Matthew Power
author_facet Richard Bevins
Elizabeth A. Walker
Nick Pearce
Duncan Pirrie
Rob Ixer
Ian Saunders
Matthew Power
author_sort Richard Bevins
collection DOAJ
description Twenty-three artefacts previously identified as being manufactured from adinole, a fine-grained metasomatic rock, from late Middle to Upper Palaeolithic cave sites in southwest Wales have been re-examined in terms of their petrology and geochemistry. Standard petrography has been combined with automated SEM-EDS analysis for a single artefact to determine the mineralogy and textures of that artefact, while portable XRF and μXRF have been combined to establish the geochemical characteristics of all twenty-three artefacts analysed. These investigations have shown that the artefacts were manufactured from rhyolite rather than adinole, a misidentification that has been in the literature for over 100 years. Some artefacts appear to cluster on geochemical plots, such as a group of eight artefacts from Hoyle’s Mouth Cave which share petrological characteristics and appear to have come from a common source. In other cases, however, certain artefacts with similar chemistries have dissimilar petrological characteristics and are not from a common source. This highlights the need to consider both petrological and geochemical characteristics when classifying rhyolitic artefacts. The artefacts studied show that this spotted variety of rhyolite was a preferred source of raw material throughout the late Middle and Upper Palaeolithic, despite having no obvious physical or practical advantages. Identifying rhyolite rather than adinole as the raw material used in the manufacture of the studied artefacts negates the need to consider long distance transport of either raw materials or finished artefacts. It strongly suggests that people in southwest Wales, where raw materials were scarce, were using materials that were local to them. Further, there is evidence that people were effectively planning for future use or reuse of artefacts, involving curation of tools. The next phase of work will use the lithological characteristics identified here to explore potential sources for the raw material used in the manufacture of these artefacts.
format Article
id doaj-art-f247f86d046a44c8b000696dfa079e0f
institution Kabale University
issn 2950-2365
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Quaternary Environments and Humans
spelling doaj-art-f247f86d046a44c8b000696dfa079e0f2025-02-06T05:13:10ZengElsevierQuaternary Environments and Humans2950-23652025-03-0131100058Lithological and geochemical characterization of ‘adinole’ artefacts from cave deposits in southwest Wales: A material of choice during the late Middle to Upper PalaeolithicRichard Bevins0Elizabeth A. Walker1Nick Pearce2Duncan Pirrie3Rob Ixer4Ian Saunders5Matthew Power6Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, United Kingdom; Corresponding author.Department of History and Archaeology, Amgueddfa Cymru - Museum Wales, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NP, United KingdomDepartment of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, United KingdomFaculty of Computing, Engineering and Science, University of South Wales, Pontypridd CF37 4BD, United KingdomInstitute of Archaeology, University College London, London WC1H 0PY, United KingdomDepartment of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, United KingdomVidence Inc., 4288 Lozells Avenue, Suite 213 – L, Burnaby, BC V5A 0C7, CanadaTwenty-three artefacts previously identified as being manufactured from adinole, a fine-grained metasomatic rock, from late Middle to Upper Palaeolithic cave sites in southwest Wales have been re-examined in terms of their petrology and geochemistry. Standard petrography has been combined with automated SEM-EDS analysis for a single artefact to determine the mineralogy and textures of that artefact, while portable XRF and μXRF have been combined to establish the geochemical characteristics of all twenty-three artefacts analysed. These investigations have shown that the artefacts were manufactured from rhyolite rather than adinole, a misidentification that has been in the literature for over 100 years. Some artefacts appear to cluster on geochemical plots, such as a group of eight artefacts from Hoyle’s Mouth Cave which share petrological characteristics and appear to have come from a common source. In other cases, however, certain artefacts with similar chemistries have dissimilar petrological characteristics and are not from a common source. This highlights the need to consider both petrological and geochemical characteristics when classifying rhyolitic artefacts. The artefacts studied show that this spotted variety of rhyolite was a preferred source of raw material throughout the late Middle and Upper Palaeolithic, despite having no obvious physical or practical advantages. Identifying rhyolite rather than adinole as the raw material used in the manufacture of the studied artefacts negates the need to consider long distance transport of either raw materials or finished artefacts. It strongly suggests that people in southwest Wales, where raw materials were scarce, were using materials that were local to them. Further, there is evidence that people were effectively planning for future use or reuse of artefacts, involving curation of tools. The next phase of work will use the lithological characteristics identified here to explore potential sources for the raw material used in the manufacture of these artefacts.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950236525000027PalaeolithicCave artefactsAdinoleRhyoliteWales
spellingShingle Richard Bevins
Elizabeth A. Walker
Nick Pearce
Duncan Pirrie
Rob Ixer
Ian Saunders
Matthew Power
Lithological and geochemical characterization of ‘adinole’ artefacts from cave deposits in southwest Wales: A material of choice during the late Middle to Upper Palaeolithic
Quaternary Environments and Humans
Palaeolithic
Cave artefacts
Adinole
Rhyolite
Wales
title Lithological and geochemical characterization of ‘adinole’ artefacts from cave deposits in southwest Wales: A material of choice during the late Middle to Upper Palaeolithic
title_full Lithological and geochemical characterization of ‘adinole’ artefacts from cave deposits in southwest Wales: A material of choice during the late Middle to Upper Palaeolithic
title_fullStr Lithological and geochemical characterization of ‘adinole’ artefacts from cave deposits in southwest Wales: A material of choice during the late Middle to Upper Palaeolithic
title_full_unstemmed Lithological and geochemical characterization of ‘adinole’ artefacts from cave deposits in southwest Wales: A material of choice during the late Middle to Upper Palaeolithic
title_short Lithological and geochemical characterization of ‘adinole’ artefacts from cave deposits in southwest Wales: A material of choice during the late Middle to Upper Palaeolithic
title_sort lithological and geochemical characterization of adinole artefacts from cave deposits in southwest wales a material of choice during the late middle to upper palaeolithic
topic Palaeolithic
Cave artefacts
Adinole
Rhyolite
Wales
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950236525000027
work_keys_str_mv AT richardbevins lithologicalandgeochemicalcharacterizationofadinoleartefactsfromcavedepositsinsouthwestwalesamaterialofchoiceduringthelatemiddletoupperpalaeolithic
AT elizabethawalker lithologicalandgeochemicalcharacterizationofadinoleartefactsfromcavedepositsinsouthwestwalesamaterialofchoiceduringthelatemiddletoupperpalaeolithic
AT nickpearce lithologicalandgeochemicalcharacterizationofadinoleartefactsfromcavedepositsinsouthwestwalesamaterialofchoiceduringthelatemiddletoupperpalaeolithic
AT duncanpirrie lithologicalandgeochemicalcharacterizationofadinoleartefactsfromcavedepositsinsouthwestwalesamaterialofchoiceduringthelatemiddletoupperpalaeolithic
AT robixer lithologicalandgeochemicalcharacterizationofadinoleartefactsfromcavedepositsinsouthwestwalesamaterialofchoiceduringthelatemiddletoupperpalaeolithic
AT iansaunders lithologicalandgeochemicalcharacterizationofadinoleartefactsfromcavedepositsinsouthwestwalesamaterialofchoiceduringthelatemiddletoupperpalaeolithic
AT matthewpower lithologicalandgeochemicalcharacterizationofadinoleartefactsfromcavedepositsinsouthwestwalesamaterialofchoiceduringthelatemiddletoupperpalaeolithic