Intravenous Oxycodone versus Intravenous Morphine in Cancer Pain: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Active-Control Study

Objective. To compare efficacy and safety of intravenous continuous infusion of oxycodone with morphine in patients with cancer pain. Methods. A 5-day, randomized, open-label, exploratory study at 6 sites in the Republic of Korea. Sixty-six adults aged ≥19 years with moderate-to-severe cancer pain (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyung-Hee Lee, Jung-Hun Kang, Ho-Suk Oh, Moon-Ki Choi, Byoung-Yong Shim, Young-Jun Eum, Hye-Jeong Park, Jin-Hyong Kang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9741729
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560776351580160
author Kyung-Hee Lee
Jung-Hun Kang
Ho-Suk Oh
Moon-Ki Choi
Byoung-Yong Shim
Young-Jun Eum
Hye-Jeong Park
Jin-Hyong Kang
author_facet Kyung-Hee Lee
Jung-Hun Kang
Ho-Suk Oh
Moon-Ki Choi
Byoung-Yong Shim
Young-Jun Eum
Hye-Jeong Park
Jin-Hyong Kang
author_sort Kyung-Hee Lee
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To compare efficacy and safety of intravenous continuous infusion of oxycodone with morphine in patients with cancer pain. Methods. A 5-day, randomized, open-label, exploratory study at 6 sites in the Republic of Korea. Sixty-six adults aged ≥19 years with moderate-to-severe cancer pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] ≥ 4) were enrolled. The study group received intravenous (IV) oxycodone, and the comparator group received IV morphine which were titrated depending on pain intensity. The efficacy endpoint is change in average NRS score from baseline to Day 5. Other assessments included worst, current, and average pain intensity; patient satisfaction; medication dose; and adverse events. Results. Both groups achieved >50% reduction in average pain intensity: from “moderate” at baseline (oxycodone versus morphine: 6.0 ± 1.8 versus 5.9 ± 1.4) to “mild” at Day 5 (2.5 ± 1.8 versus 2.8 ± 1.6). While this reduction was similar between groups (3.5 ± 2.2 versus 3.1 ± 1.8, P value = 0.562), oxycodone achieved faster pain relief (average pain: 3.0 ± 1.6 versus 3.9 ± 1.6, P value = 0.020) on Day 2 and significant NRS reductions for worst pain on Day 2 (P value = 0.045) and current pain on Day 2 (P value = 0.035) and Day 5 (P value = 0.020) compared to morphine. Patient satisfaction, adverse events, and adverse drug reactions were similar for both groups. Conclusions. For Asian patients with cancer pain, IV oxycodone is faster acting and showed similar analgesic efficacy and safety profiles as IV morphine. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02660229.
format Article
id doaj-art-f222325a96d642f6bc64030d71abc09c
institution Kabale University
issn 1203-6765
1918-1523
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pain Research and Management
spelling doaj-art-f222325a96d642f6bc64030d71abc09c2025-02-03T01:26:47ZengWileyPain Research and Management1203-67651918-15232017-01-01201710.1155/2017/97417299741729Intravenous Oxycodone versus Intravenous Morphine in Cancer Pain: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Active-Control StudyKyung-Hee Lee0Jung-Hun Kang1Ho-Suk Oh2Moon-Ki Choi3Byoung-Yong Shim4Young-Jun Eum5Hye-Jeong Park6Jin-Hyong Kang7Department of Hematology/Oncology, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangneung, Republic of KoreaCenter for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Ilsan, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Suwon, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Medical Affairs, Mundipharma Korea Ltd, Seoul, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Medical Affairs, Mundipharma Korea Ltd, Seoul, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Republic of KoreaObjective. To compare efficacy and safety of intravenous continuous infusion of oxycodone with morphine in patients with cancer pain. Methods. A 5-day, randomized, open-label, exploratory study at 6 sites in the Republic of Korea. Sixty-six adults aged ≥19 years with moderate-to-severe cancer pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] ≥ 4) were enrolled. The study group received intravenous (IV) oxycodone, and the comparator group received IV morphine which were titrated depending on pain intensity. The efficacy endpoint is change in average NRS score from baseline to Day 5. Other assessments included worst, current, and average pain intensity; patient satisfaction; medication dose; and adverse events. Results. Both groups achieved >50% reduction in average pain intensity: from “moderate” at baseline (oxycodone versus morphine: 6.0 ± 1.8 versus 5.9 ± 1.4) to “mild” at Day 5 (2.5 ± 1.8 versus 2.8 ± 1.6). While this reduction was similar between groups (3.5 ± 2.2 versus 3.1 ± 1.8, P value = 0.562), oxycodone achieved faster pain relief (average pain: 3.0 ± 1.6 versus 3.9 ± 1.6, P value = 0.020) on Day 2 and significant NRS reductions for worst pain on Day 2 (P value = 0.045) and current pain on Day 2 (P value = 0.035) and Day 5 (P value = 0.020) compared to morphine. Patient satisfaction, adverse events, and adverse drug reactions were similar for both groups. Conclusions. For Asian patients with cancer pain, IV oxycodone is faster acting and showed similar analgesic efficacy and safety profiles as IV morphine. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02660229.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9741729
spellingShingle Kyung-Hee Lee
Jung-Hun Kang
Ho-Suk Oh
Moon-Ki Choi
Byoung-Yong Shim
Young-Jun Eum
Hye-Jeong Park
Jin-Hyong Kang
Intravenous Oxycodone versus Intravenous Morphine in Cancer Pain: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Active-Control Study
Pain Research and Management
title Intravenous Oxycodone versus Intravenous Morphine in Cancer Pain: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Active-Control Study
title_full Intravenous Oxycodone versus Intravenous Morphine in Cancer Pain: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Active-Control Study
title_fullStr Intravenous Oxycodone versus Intravenous Morphine in Cancer Pain: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Active-Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous Oxycodone versus Intravenous Morphine in Cancer Pain: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Active-Control Study
title_short Intravenous Oxycodone versus Intravenous Morphine in Cancer Pain: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Active-Control Study
title_sort intravenous oxycodone versus intravenous morphine in cancer pain a randomized open label parallel group active control study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9741729
work_keys_str_mv AT kyungheelee intravenousoxycodoneversusintravenousmorphineincancerpainarandomizedopenlabelparallelgroupactivecontrolstudy
AT junghunkang intravenousoxycodoneversusintravenousmorphineincancerpainarandomizedopenlabelparallelgroupactivecontrolstudy
AT hosukoh intravenousoxycodoneversusintravenousmorphineincancerpainarandomizedopenlabelparallelgroupactivecontrolstudy
AT moonkichoi intravenousoxycodoneversusintravenousmorphineincancerpainarandomizedopenlabelparallelgroupactivecontrolstudy
AT byoungyongshim intravenousoxycodoneversusintravenousmorphineincancerpainarandomizedopenlabelparallelgroupactivecontrolstudy
AT youngjuneum intravenousoxycodoneversusintravenousmorphineincancerpainarandomizedopenlabelparallelgroupactivecontrolstudy
AT hyejeongpark intravenousoxycodoneversusintravenousmorphineincancerpainarandomizedopenlabelparallelgroupactivecontrolstudy
AT jinhyongkang intravenousoxycodoneversusintravenousmorphineincancerpainarandomizedopenlabelparallelgroupactivecontrolstudy