Hyperspectral imaging for precision nitrogen management: A comparative exploration of two methodological approaches to estimate optimal nitrogen rate in processing tomato

Hyperspectral imaging is widespread in crop nitrogen (N) monitoring for precision agriculture, although approaches that address the agronomical recommendation of the optimal N rate are still lacking. Here, two approaches are explored in defining the optimal N rate to be supplied in fertigated proces...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vito Aurelio Cerasola, Francesco Orsini, Giuseppina Pennisi, Gaia Moretti, Stefano Bona, Francesco Mirone, Jochem Verrelst, Katja Berger, Giorgio Gianquinto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:Smart Agricultural Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277237552500036X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832542481916362752
author Vito Aurelio Cerasola
Francesco Orsini
Giuseppina Pennisi
Gaia Moretti
Stefano Bona
Francesco Mirone
Jochem Verrelst
Katja Berger
Giorgio Gianquinto
author_facet Vito Aurelio Cerasola
Francesco Orsini
Giuseppina Pennisi
Gaia Moretti
Stefano Bona
Francesco Mirone
Jochem Verrelst
Katja Berger
Giorgio Gianquinto
author_sort Vito Aurelio Cerasola
collection DOAJ
description Hyperspectral imaging is widespread in crop nitrogen (N) monitoring for precision agriculture, although approaches that address the agronomical recommendation of the optimal N rate are still lacking. Here, two approaches are explored in defining the optimal N rate to be supplied in fertigated processing tomatoes through hyperspectral imaging. The first one, called the N uptake approach, focuses on the virtual reproduction of the critical N uptake curve through the estimation of both aboveground biomass and crop N uptake. The estimated biomass is used to derive the critical N uptake, and the optimal N rate is computed as the difference between the critical N uptake and the estimated actual N uptake. The second approach focuses on the monitoring of the Nitrogen Nutrition Index (NNI) and biomass. Again, the biomass is used to calculate the critical N uptake, which, when combined with the estimated NNI, resolves the equation to retrieve the actual crop N uptake. A modeling stage was included to estimate the N-related variables from crop canopy reflectance across the full spectrum (400–1000 nm). Canopy reflectance was measured by using an unmanned aerial vehicle at five growth stages of processing tomatoes grown under experimental plot conditions with different N rates. Three nonparametric algorithms were trained, i.e., Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Partial Least Square Regression (PLSR). Multicollinearity of spectral bands was prevented with a principal component analysis, and models were 5-fold cross-validated. Considering the pivotal role of biomass in the selected N rate estimation approaches, two distinct biomass estimation methods were explored. The direct biomass retrieval from spectral data was compared with the indirect biomass retrieval from the remotely sensed LAI applying empirical regressions. PLSR outperformed the other algorithms in estimating N uptake (Relative Root Mean Square Error, RRMSE=21.8 %), while SVR better estimated NNI (RRMSE=10.2 %) and direct biomass (RRMSE=19.4 %). The indirect estimation of biomass outperformed the direct approach when GPR is used (RRMSE 18.2 % vs. 21.4 %), although the influence of soil background at early growth stages determines an unreliable biomass estimation for both methods. The NNI approach outperformed the N uptake approach in estimating the optimal N rate, especially when the biomass is directly retrieved from GPR. The promising estimation performances in N rate estimation (R2=0.88 and RRMSE=36 %) revealed the effectiveness of hyperspectral imaging in entering the agronomical scheduling of precision N management.
format Article
id doaj-art-f1bb534855644638b94d7efad31d631e
institution Kabale University
issn 2772-3755
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Smart Agricultural Technology
spelling doaj-art-f1bb534855644638b94d7efad31d631e2025-02-04T04:10:40ZengElsevierSmart Agricultural Technology2772-37552025-03-0110100802Hyperspectral imaging for precision nitrogen management: A comparative exploration of two methodological approaches to estimate optimal nitrogen rate in processing tomatoVito Aurelio Cerasola0Francesco Orsini1Giuseppina Pennisi2Gaia Moretti3Stefano Bona4Francesco Mirone5Jochem Verrelst6Katja Berger7Giorgio Gianquinto8Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 44, Bologna 40127, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 44, Bologna 40127, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 44, Bologna 40127, Italy; Corresponding author.Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 44, Bologna 40127, ItalyDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università, 16, Legnaro, PD 35020, ItalyDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università, 16, Legnaro, PD 35020, ItalyImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), Universitat de València, València, SpainGFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, GermanyDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), Alma Mater Studiorum–University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 44, Bologna 40127, ItalyHyperspectral imaging is widespread in crop nitrogen (N) monitoring for precision agriculture, although approaches that address the agronomical recommendation of the optimal N rate are still lacking. Here, two approaches are explored in defining the optimal N rate to be supplied in fertigated processing tomatoes through hyperspectral imaging. The first one, called the N uptake approach, focuses on the virtual reproduction of the critical N uptake curve through the estimation of both aboveground biomass and crop N uptake. The estimated biomass is used to derive the critical N uptake, and the optimal N rate is computed as the difference between the critical N uptake and the estimated actual N uptake. The second approach focuses on the monitoring of the Nitrogen Nutrition Index (NNI) and biomass. Again, the biomass is used to calculate the critical N uptake, which, when combined with the estimated NNI, resolves the equation to retrieve the actual crop N uptake. A modeling stage was included to estimate the N-related variables from crop canopy reflectance across the full spectrum (400–1000 nm). Canopy reflectance was measured by using an unmanned aerial vehicle at five growth stages of processing tomatoes grown under experimental plot conditions with different N rates. Three nonparametric algorithms were trained, i.e., Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Partial Least Square Regression (PLSR). Multicollinearity of spectral bands was prevented with a principal component analysis, and models were 5-fold cross-validated. Considering the pivotal role of biomass in the selected N rate estimation approaches, two distinct biomass estimation methods were explored. The direct biomass retrieval from spectral data was compared with the indirect biomass retrieval from the remotely sensed LAI applying empirical regressions. PLSR outperformed the other algorithms in estimating N uptake (Relative Root Mean Square Error, RRMSE=21.8 %), while SVR better estimated NNI (RRMSE=10.2 %) and direct biomass (RRMSE=19.4 %). The indirect estimation of biomass outperformed the direct approach when GPR is used (RRMSE 18.2 % vs. 21.4 %), although the influence of soil background at early growth stages determines an unreliable biomass estimation for both methods. The NNI approach outperformed the N uptake approach in estimating the optimal N rate, especially when the biomass is directly retrieved from GPR. The promising estimation performances in N rate estimation (R2=0.88 and RRMSE=36 %) revealed the effectiveness of hyperspectral imaging in entering the agronomical scheduling of precision N management.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277237552500036XPrecision nitrogen managementHyperspectral imagingMachine learningNitrogen nutrition indexNitrogen rate
spellingShingle Vito Aurelio Cerasola
Francesco Orsini
Giuseppina Pennisi
Gaia Moretti
Stefano Bona
Francesco Mirone
Jochem Verrelst
Katja Berger
Giorgio Gianquinto
Hyperspectral imaging for precision nitrogen management: A comparative exploration of two methodological approaches to estimate optimal nitrogen rate in processing tomato
Smart Agricultural Technology
Precision nitrogen management
Hyperspectral imaging
Machine learning
Nitrogen nutrition index
Nitrogen rate
title Hyperspectral imaging for precision nitrogen management: A comparative exploration of two methodological approaches to estimate optimal nitrogen rate in processing tomato
title_full Hyperspectral imaging for precision nitrogen management: A comparative exploration of two methodological approaches to estimate optimal nitrogen rate in processing tomato
title_fullStr Hyperspectral imaging for precision nitrogen management: A comparative exploration of two methodological approaches to estimate optimal nitrogen rate in processing tomato
title_full_unstemmed Hyperspectral imaging for precision nitrogen management: A comparative exploration of two methodological approaches to estimate optimal nitrogen rate in processing tomato
title_short Hyperspectral imaging for precision nitrogen management: A comparative exploration of two methodological approaches to estimate optimal nitrogen rate in processing tomato
title_sort hyperspectral imaging for precision nitrogen management a comparative exploration of two methodological approaches to estimate optimal nitrogen rate in processing tomato
topic Precision nitrogen management
Hyperspectral imaging
Machine learning
Nitrogen nutrition index
Nitrogen rate
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277237552500036X
work_keys_str_mv AT vitoaureliocerasola hyperspectralimagingforprecisionnitrogenmanagementacomparativeexplorationoftwomethodologicalapproachestoestimateoptimalnitrogenrateinprocessingtomato
AT francescoorsini hyperspectralimagingforprecisionnitrogenmanagementacomparativeexplorationoftwomethodologicalapproachestoestimateoptimalnitrogenrateinprocessingtomato
AT giuseppinapennisi hyperspectralimagingforprecisionnitrogenmanagementacomparativeexplorationoftwomethodologicalapproachestoestimateoptimalnitrogenrateinprocessingtomato
AT gaiamoretti hyperspectralimagingforprecisionnitrogenmanagementacomparativeexplorationoftwomethodologicalapproachestoestimateoptimalnitrogenrateinprocessingtomato
AT stefanobona hyperspectralimagingforprecisionnitrogenmanagementacomparativeexplorationoftwomethodologicalapproachestoestimateoptimalnitrogenrateinprocessingtomato
AT francescomirone hyperspectralimagingforprecisionnitrogenmanagementacomparativeexplorationoftwomethodologicalapproachestoestimateoptimalnitrogenrateinprocessingtomato
AT jochemverrelst hyperspectralimagingforprecisionnitrogenmanagementacomparativeexplorationoftwomethodologicalapproachestoestimateoptimalnitrogenrateinprocessingtomato
AT katjaberger hyperspectralimagingforprecisionnitrogenmanagementacomparativeexplorationoftwomethodologicalapproachestoestimateoptimalnitrogenrateinprocessingtomato
AT giorgiogianquinto hyperspectralimagingforprecisionnitrogenmanagementacomparativeexplorationoftwomethodologicalapproachestoestimateoptimalnitrogenrateinprocessingtomato