The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement
In healthy dialogue, there are always people who disagree, even if they are eccentric flat-Earthers. Something about human psychology seems to require that some people always take up a contrary position to the majority on any substantive idea, and empirical evidence always permits this, because it...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Johannesburg
2020-03-01
|
Series: | The Thinker |
Online Access: | https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/The_Thinker/article/view/229 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832583687809531904 |
---|---|
author | Alex Broadbent |
author_facet | Alex Broadbent |
author_sort | Alex Broadbent |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
In healthy dialogue, there are always people who disagree, even if they are eccentric flat-Earthers. Something about human psychology seems to require that some people always take up a contrary position to the majority on any substantive idea, and empirical evidence always permits this, because it always underdetermines the conclusions we draw from it. When there is no disagreement on a certain idea, therefore, we have to consider that we’re either not assessing the idea properly, or not entertaining all opinions. If we were, some of us would come to different conclusions.
|
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-f1b3e6ebf94a45ed9f2c73fc2c57fa88 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2075-2458 2616-907X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020-03-01 |
publisher | University of Johannesburg |
record_format | Article |
series | The Thinker |
spelling | doaj-art-f1b3e6ebf94a45ed9f2c73fc2c57fa882025-01-28T09:02:43ZengUniversity of JohannesburgThe Thinker2075-24582616-907X2020-03-0183110.36615/thethinker.v83i1.229The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of DisagreementAlex Broadbent In healthy dialogue, there are always people who disagree, even if they are eccentric flat-Earthers. Something about human psychology seems to require that some people always take up a contrary position to the majority on any substantive idea, and empirical evidence always permits this, because it always underdetermines the conclusions we draw from it. When there is no disagreement on a certain idea, therefore, we have to consider that we’re either not assessing the idea properly, or not entertaining all opinions. If we were, some of us would come to different conclusions. https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/The_Thinker/article/view/229 |
spellingShingle | Alex Broadbent The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement The Thinker |
title | The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement |
title_full | The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement |
title_fullStr | The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement |
title_full_unstemmed | The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement |
title_short | The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement |
title_sort | fourth industrial revolution and the importance of disagreement |
url | https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/The_Thinker/article/view/229 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alexbroadbent thefourthindustrialrevolutionandtheimportanceofdisagreement AT alexbroadbent fourthindustrialrevolutionandtheimportanceofdisagreement |