The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement

In healthy dialogue, there are always people who disagree, even if they are eccentric flat-Earthers. Something about human psychology seems to require that some people always take up a contrary position to the majority on any substantive idea, and empirical evidence always permits this, because it...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alex Broadbent
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Johannesburg 2020-03-01
Series:The Thinker
Online Access:https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/The_Thinker/article/view/229
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583687809531904
author Alex Broadbent
author_facet Alex Broadbent
author_sort Alex Broadbent
collection DOAJ
description In healthy dialogue, there are always people who disagree, even if they are eccentric flat-Earthers. Something about human psychology seems to require that some people always take up a contrary position to the majority on any substantive idea, and empirical evidence always permits this, because it always underdetermines the conclusions we draw from it. When there is no disagreement on a certain idea, therefore, we have to consider that we’re either not assessing the idea properly, or not entertaining all opinions. If we were, some of us would come to different conclusions.
format Article
id doaj-art-f1b3e6ebf94a45ed9f2c73fc2c57fa88
institution Kabale University
issn 2075-2458
2616-907X
language English
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher University of Johannesburg
record_format Article
series The Thinker
spelling doaj-art-f1b3e6ebf94a45ed9f2c73fc2c57fa882025-01-28T09:02:43ZengUniversity of JohannesburgThe Thinker2075-24582616-907X2020-03-0183110.36615/thethinker.v83i1.229The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of DisagreementAlex Broadbent In healthy dialogue, there are always people who disagree, even if they are eccentric flat-Earthers. Something about human psychology seems to require that some people always take up a contrary position to the majority on any substantive idea, and empirical evidence always permits this, because it always underdetermines the conclusions we draw from it. When there is no disagreement on a certain idea, therefore, we have to consider that we’re either not assessing the idea properly, or not entertaining all opinions. If we were, some of us would come to different conclusions. https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/The_Thinker/article/view/229
spellingShingle Alex Broadbent
The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement
The Thinker
title The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement
title_full The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement
title_fullStr The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement
title_full_unstemmed The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement
title_short The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Importance of Disagreement
title_sort fourth industrial revolution and the importance of disagreement
url https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/The_Thinker/article/view/229
work_keys_str_mv AT alexbroadbent thefourthindustrialrevolutionandtheimportanceofdisagreement
AT alexbroadbent fourthindustrialrevolutionandtheimportanceofdisagreement