Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection with Cidofovir and CMV Immune Globulin in a Lung Transplant Recipient

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after lung transplantation is associated with increased risk for pneumonitis and bronchiolitis obliterans as well as allograft rejection and opportunistic infections. Ganciclovir is the mainstay of prophylaxis and treatment but CMV infections can be unresponsive. Apar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heinrike Wilkens, Martina Sester
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Transplantation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4560745
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832564925856219136
author Heinrike Wilkens
Martina Sester
author_facet Heinrike Wilkens
Martina Sester
author_sort Heinrike Wilkens
collection DOAJ
description Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after lung transplantation is associated with increased risk for pneumonitis and bronchiolitis obliterans as well as allograft rejection and opportunistic infections. Ganciclovir is the mainstay of prophylaxis and treatment but CMV infections can be unresponsive. Apart from direct antiviral drugs, CMV immunoglobulin (CMVIG) preparations may be considered but are only licensed for prophylaxis. A CMV-seronegative 42-year-old man with cystic fibrosis received a lung from a CMV-seropositive donor. Intravenous ganciclovir prophylaxis was delayed until day 12 due to acute postoperative renal failure and was accompanied by five doses of CMVIG (10 g). By day 16, CMV-DNA was detectable and rising; CMV-specific T-cells were undetectable. Switch from ganciclovir to foscarnet prompted a transient decrease in CMV viral load, but after increasing again to reach 3600 copies/mL foscarnet was changed to intravenous cidofovir and CMVIG was restarted. CMV load continued to fluctuate and declined slowly, whereas CMV-specific T-cells were detected five months later and increased thereafter. At last follow-up, the patient was in very good clinical condition with no evidence of bronchiolitis obliterans. No side effects of this treatment were observed. In this hard-to-treat case, the combination of cidofovir with off-label use of CMVIG contributed to a successful outcome.
format Article
id doaj-art-f15d79925b804ee78b952a0baeef75a1
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6943
2090-6951
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Transplantation
spelling doaj-art-f15d79925b804ee78b952a0baeef75a12025-02-03T01:09:53ZengWileyCase Reports in Transplantation2090-69432090-69512016-01-01201610.1155/2016/45607454560745Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection with Cidofovir and CMV Immune Globulin in a Lung Transplant RecipientHeinrike Wilkens0Martina Sester1Department of Internal Medicine V-Pneumology, Allergology, Respiratory and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital of Saarland, Kirrbergerstrasse 100, Homburg, 66421 Saarland, GermanyDepartment of Transplant and Infection Immunology, Saarland University, Kirrbergerstrasse, Building 47, Homburg, 66421 Saarland, GermanyCytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after lung transplantation is associated with increased risk for pneumonitis and bronchiolitis obliterans as well as allograft rejection and opportunistic infections. Ganciclovir is the mainstay of prophylaxis and treatment but CMV infections can be unresponsive. Apart from direct antiviral drugs, CMV immunoglobulin (CMVIG) preparations may be considered but are only licensed for prophylaxis. A CMV-seronegative 42-year-old man with cystic fibrosis received a lung from a CMV-seropositive donor. Intravenous ganciclovir prophylaxis was delayed until day 12 due to acute postoperative renal failure and was accompanied by five doses of CMVIG (10 g). By day 16, CMV-DNA was detectable and rising; CMV-specific T-cells were undetectable. Switch from ganciclovir to foscarnet prompted a transient decrease in CMV viral load, but after increasing again to reach 3600 copies/mL foscarnet was changed to intravenous cidofovir and CMVIG was restarted. CMV load continued to fluctuate and declined slowly, whereas CMV-specific T-cells were detected five months later and increased thereafter. At last follow-up, the patient was in very good clinical condition with no evidence of bronchiolitis obliterans. No side effects of this treatment were observed. In this hard-to-treat case, the combination of cidofovir with off-label use of CMVIG contributed to a successful outcome.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4560745
spellingShingle Heinrike Wilkens
Martina Sester
Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection with Cidofovir and CMV Immune Globulin in a Lung Transplant Recipient
Case Reports in Transplantation
title Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection with Cidofovir and CMV Immune Globulin in a Lung Transplant Recipient
title_full Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection with Cidofovir and CMV Immune Globulin in a Lung Transplant Recipient
title_fullStr Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection with Cidofovir and CMV Immune Globulin in a Lung Transplant Recipient
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection with Cidofovir and CMV Immune Globulin in a Lung Transplant Recipient
title_short Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection with Cidofovir and CMV Immune Globulin in a Lung Transplant Recipient
title_sort treatment of cytomegalovirus infection with cidofovir and cmv immune globulin in a lung transplant recipient
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4560745
work_keys_str_mv AT heinrikewilkens treatmentofcytomegalovirusinfectionwithcidofovirandcmvimmuneglobulininalungtransplantrecipient
AT martinasester treatmentofcytomegalovirusinfectionwithcidofovirandcmvimmuneglobulininalungtransplantrecipient