Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Esophageal Dilatation in Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Strictures

Background and Objectives. Benign strictures are the main cause of esophageal strictures in children. They can be managed by different modalities but endoscopic dilatation is the standard therapy. This study is aimed at reviewing the efficacy and safety of endoscopic dilatations in children with eso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hasan M. A. Isa, Khadija A. Hasan, Husain Y. Ahmed, Afaf M. Mohamed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Pediatrics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1277530
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832561187457335296
author Hasan M. A. Isa
Khadija A. Hasan
Husain Y. Ahmed
Afaf M. Mohamed
author_facet Hasan M. A. Isa
Khadija A. Hasan
Husain Y. Ahmed
Afaf M. Mohamed
author_sort Hasan M. A. Isa
collection DOAJ
description Background and Objectives. Benign strictures are the main cause of esophageal strictures in children. They can be managed by different modalities but endoscopic dilatation is the standard therapy. This study is aimed at reviewing the efficacy and safety of endoscopic dilatations in children with esophageal strictures. Materials and Methods. In this retrospective cross-sectional single center study, records of patients with esophageal strictures presented to the pediatric department, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Bahrain, in the period between 1995 and 2019 were reviewed. Demographic data, indications of endoscopic dilatations, the procedure success rate, and possible complications were assessed. Results. Forty-six children were found to have esophageal strictures. Twenty-five (54.3%) patients were males. Most patients presented during infancy (86.5%, 32/37 patients). Twenty-six (56.5%) patients required 88 dilatation sessions, while the remaining 20 (43.5%) patients did not require dilatations. The median number of dilatation sessions per patient was three (interquartile range=2–5). Savary-Gilliard bougienages were the main dilators used (80.8%, 21/26 patients). Anastomotic stricture (post esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair) was the main cause of esophageal strictures and was found in 35 (76.1%) patients. Patients with nonanastomotic strictures had more frequent dilatations compared to those with anastomotic strictures (P=0.007). The procedure success rate was 98.8%. Yet, it was operator dependent (P=0.047). Complete response to dilatation was found in 18 (69.2%) patients, satisfactory in seven (26.9%), and an inadequate response in one (3.9%). Those with satisfactory responses still require ongoing dilatations based on their symptoms and radiological and endoscopic findings. No perforation or mortality was reported. Patients with dilatations had more recurrent hospitalization (P<0.0001), more dysphagia (P=0.001), but shorter hospital stay (P=0.046) compared to those without dilatations. Surgical intervention was required in one patient with caustic strictures. The median follow-up period was six years (interquartile range=2.25–9.0). Conclusions. Endoscopic esophageal dilatation in children with esophageal strictures is effective and safe. Yet, it was operator dependent. Nonanastomotic strictures require more dilatations compared to anastomotic strictures. Findings of this study are comparable to those reported worldwide.
format Article
id doaj-art-f14c6b185d894d70886acde43d254346
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9740
1687-9759
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Pediatrics
spelling doaj-art-f14c6b185d894d70886acde43d2543462025-02-03T01:25:47ZengWileyInternational Journal of Pediatrics1687-97401687-97592021-01-01202110.1155/2021/12775301277530Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Esophageal Dilatation in Pediatric Patients with Esophageal StricturesHasan M. A. Isa0Khadija A. Hasan1Husain Y. Ahmed2Afaf M. Mohamed3Pediatric Department, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, BahrainPediatric Department, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, BahrainPediatric Department, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, BahrainPublic Health Department, Ministry of Health, Manama, BahrainBackground and Objectives. Benign strictures are the main cause of esophageal strictures in children. They can be managed by different modalities but endoscopic dilatation is the standard therapy. This study is aimed at reviewing the efficacy and safety of endoscopic dilatations in children with esophageal strictures. Materials and Methods. In this retrospective cross-sectional single center study, records of patients with esophageal strictures presented to the pediatric department, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Bahrain, in the period between 1995 and 2019 were reviewed. Demographic data, indications of endoscopic dilatations, the procedure success rate, and possible complications were assessed. Results. Forty-six children were found to have esophageal strictures. Twenty-five (54.3%) patients were males. Most patients presented during infancy (86.5%, 32/37 patients). Twenty-six (56.5%) patients required 88 dilatation sessions, while the remaining 20 (43.5%) patients did not require dilatations. The median number of dilatation sessions per patient was three (interquartile range=2–5). Savary-Gilliard bougienages were the main dilators used (80.8%, 21/26 patients). Anastomotic stricture (post esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair) was the main cause of esophageal strictures and was found in 35 (76.1%) patients. Patients with nonanastomotic strictures had more frequent dilatations compared to those with anastomotic strictures (P=0.007). The procedure success rate was 98.8%. Yet, it was operator dependent (P=0.047). Complete response to dilatation was found in 18 (69.2%) patients, satisfactory in seven (26.9%), and an inadequate response in one (3.9%). Those with satisfactory responses still require ongoing dilatations based on their symptoms and radiological and endoscopic findings. No perforation or mortality was reported. Patients with dilatations had more recurrent hospitalization (P<0.0001), more dysphagia (P=0.001), but shorter hospital stay (P=0.046) compared to those without dilatations. Surgical intervention was required in one patient with caustic strictures. The median follow-up period was six years (interquartile range=2.25–9.0). Conclusions. Endoscopic esophageal dilatation in children with esophageal strictures is effective and safe. Yet, it was operator dependent. Nonanastomotic strictures require more dilatations compared to anastomotic strictures. Findings of this study are comparable to those reported worldwide.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1277530
spellingShingle Hasan M. A. Isa
Khadija A. Hasan
Husain Y. Ahmed
Afaf M. Mohamed
Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Esophageal Dilatation in Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Strictures
International Journal of Pediatrics
title Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Esophageal Dilatation in Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Strictures
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Esophageal Dilatation in Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Strictures
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Esophageal Dilatation in Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Strictures
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Esophageal Dilatation in Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Strictures
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Esophageal Dilatation in Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Strictures
title_sort efficacy and safety of endoscopic esophageal dilatation in pediatric patients with esophageal strictures
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1277530
work_keys_str_mv AT hasanmaisa efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicesophagealdilatationinpediatricpatientswithesophagealstrictures
AT khadijaahasan efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicesophagealdilatationinpediatricpatientswithesophagealstrictures
AT husainyahmed efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicesophagealdilatationinpediatricpatientswithesophagealstrictures
AT afafmmohamed efficacyandsafetyofendoscopicesophagealdilatationinpediatricpatientswithesophagealstrictures